Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01288
Original file (ND04-01288.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-BMSA, USN
Docket No. ND04-01288

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20040810. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20050118. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated
Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

 1. “My discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in 33 months of service with no other adverse action. (change to honorable.)”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     960506 - 960731  COG
          Active: None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 960801               Date of Discharge: 990518

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 09 17
         Inactive: None
Age at Entry: 26                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 35
Highest Rate: BMSN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
Performance: 3.25 (4)             Behavior: 2.50 (4)                OTA: 3.14

 Military Decorations: None
Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NER, NDSM, RSSR, Expert Rifle Medal

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None
Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly 3630620.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

980930:  Medical evaluation: Applicant diagnosed as Axis I, Alcohol dependent (physical and psychological) and Dipthymia. Plan, continue level II CAAC, continue AA meetings, f/u MHC for depression.
Unknown:         NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a. No other information in record [extracted from evaluation report and counseling record].
990518:  Applicant discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
Complete discharge package unavailable

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19990518 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (B and C). The presumption of regularity of governmental affairs was applied by the Board in this case in the absence of a complete discharge package (D).

Issue 1: Normally, to permit relief, an impropriety or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such impropriety or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. The Applicant was awarded nonjuducial punishment for a violation of UCMJ Article 112a for drug abuse. Mandatory processing for separation is required for sailors who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. Based upon available records, nothing indicates that the Applicant’s discharge was in any way inconsistent with the standards of discipline in the United States Navy. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 Dec 97 to 19 May 99, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .
D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:
                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00799

    Original file (ND04-00799.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION No indication of appeal in the record.031215: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse per Separation Authority 1910-146 [Extracted from DD Form 214].NO DISCHARGE PACKAGE AVAILABLE PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20031215 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). You may view DoD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00641

    Original file (ND04-00641.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01138

    Original file (ND04-01138.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500192

    Original file (ND0500192.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general (under honorable conditions). PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION I am more responsible person now when I was in my personality was not responsible.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00419

    Original file (ND04-00419.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 020710 - 021007 COG Active: USN None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 021008 Date of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00968

    Original file (ND04-00968.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION No indication of appeal in the record.001129: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146.Applicant’s discharge package missing from service record PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500498

    Original file (ND0500498.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 950103: Reenlisted this date for 4 years.980526: NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 980515 tested positive for cocaine.980609: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of cocaine on or about 980512. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500159

    Original file (ND0500159.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500503

    Original file (ND0500503.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Applicant notified that if separation is approved the least favorable characterization of service possible is under other than honorable conditions.030718: Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27(b), elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500168

    Original file (ND0500168.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised,...