Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500842
Original file (ND0500842.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-HR, USN
Docket No. ND05-00842

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050413. The Applicant requested that his characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20060119. After a thorough review of all available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the characterization of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“I’M TRYING TO USE MY GI BILL THAT I PAID INTO”
Documentation
The Applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board’s consideration.

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     19931207 – 19940612               COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 19940613             Date of Discharge: 19960815

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 02 03
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):

         Unauthorized absence: none
         Confinement:              none

 Age at Entry: 19

 Years Contracted: 4 (12 month extension)

 Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 50

 Highest Rate: HN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NA*                  Behavior: 3.6 (1)                 OTA: 2 .96 (2)

 Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): National Defense Service Medal.
* Not Available


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

931207:  Program waiver approved for 12-time use of marijuana for the HM rating.

 941103:  NJP for violation of the UCMJ, Article 90 (willfully disobey a superior commissioned officer).
 Award: Forfeiture of $250 per month for 2 month (1 month suspended for six months), reduction to E-2 (suspended for 6 months). No indication of appeal in the record.

 950428:  Suspended forfeiture of pay and reduction in pay grade awarded at NJP on 941103 vacated due to continued misconduct i.e. unauthorized absence and failure to obey a direct order.
950502:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiencies (unauthorized absences, failure to obey direct orders), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

960415:  NJP for violation of the UCMJ, Article 134 (fleeing the scene of an accident).
         Award: Reduction to E-1. No indication of appeal in the record.
960506:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense and pattern of misconduct.

960624:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel, elected to waive all rights.
960701:  Commanding Officer, Naval Hospital, Millington recommended the Chief of Naval Personnel that HR W_ (Applicant) be discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense. Commanding Officer’s comments: “HR W_ (Applicant) shows no interest in continuing his Naval career as evidenced by his decision to waive an Administrative Board. He has shown disrespect for his superior commissioned officers, as well as total disregard for lawful orders given to him by his superiors as evidenced by his Non-Judicial Punishment vacation on 28 APR 95 and his VUCMJ Article 134 (Fleeing the scene of an accident) Non-Judicial Punishment of 15 Apr 96. It is my recommendation that HR W_ (Applicant) be discharged with an Other Than Honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to commission of serious offense.”

960729:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 19960815 by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of all available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 To be legally sufficient, a finding of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense requires only a showing (by a preponderance of the evidence) that misconduct, which would warrant a punitive discharge if tried by special or general court-martial, has occurred. When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has met the standard of acceptable conduct and performance, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. A under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member's conduct or performance outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. T he Applicant’s service was flawed by 2 nonjudicial punishments (NJP) for violations of UCMJ, Article 90 (willfully disobey a superior commissioned officer) and Article 134 (fleeing the scene of an accident), as well as the vacation of a suspended sentence and a retention warning for continued misconduct. Reference (A) defines violations of the UCMJ, Article 90 (willfully disobey a superior commissioned officer) and Article 134 (fleeing the scene of an accident) as the commission of a serious offense, the misconduct for which the Applicant was discharged. Applicable regulations require that a Sailor’s characterization of service be based upon the member’s total performance of duty and conduct during the current enlistment. Separations under these conditions generally result in an under other than honorable characterization of service. Relief denied.

The Applicant’s sole issue is that of obtaining the use of his GI Bill. The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the purpose of enhancing medical, employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge. This issue is without merit, relief not warranted.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective
22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

 B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 90 (willfully disobey a superior commissioned officer) and Article 134 (fleeing the scene of an accident).

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00702

    Original file (ND99-00702.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    971008: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and commission of a serious offense, that the misconduct warranted separation, and by a vote of 2 to 1 recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 971112 under other than honorable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600958

    Original file (ND0600958.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. No indication of appeal in the record.930116: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and/or misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.930116: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00672

    Original file (MD01-00672.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION No indication of appeal in the record.860106: Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct [Concerning my conviction on 850708 while driving under the influence of alcohol and having driving privileges revoked for a period of 12 months aboard MCB, CAMP PENDLETON, CA]. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00791

    Original file (ND01-00791.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.921015: Assistant Legal Officer's memo to Combat Systems Dept Hd advised applicant being administratively processed for discharge from the naval service due to Alcohol Rehab Failure and by commission of serious offenses.921101: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense, by a pattern of misconduct and by alcohol abuse rehabilitation...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500944

    Original file (MD1500944.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Types of Witnesses Who Testified Expert: Character:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801898

    Original file (MD0801898.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s medical record shows the Applicant was seen by medical personnel regularly, especially between December 2006 and June 2007 when his NJP and SCM were held, for a variety of reasons including a required mess duty physical, physical ailment and mental health treatment. Less than a week into his restriction, Private Greene drank alcohol (despite being on restriction), attempted to drive a vehicle while intoxicated, and was in a car accident before he reached the exit of the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300892

    Original file (MD1300892.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00690

    Original file (ND03-00690.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION ), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.940902: Vacate suspended forfeiture awarded at CO’s NJP dated 940614 due to continued misconduct.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600358

    Original file (ND0600358.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 050519: Applicant discharged. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20050519 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600191

    Original file (ND0600191.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Please correct the enlistment code so I can reenlist in the military.”Additional issues submitted by Applicant’s counsel/representative (Disabled American Veterans): “Dear Chairperson: After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of evidence...