Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500127
Original file (ND0500127.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PNSR, USN
Docket No. ND05-00127

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20041029. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions) and the reason for the discharge be left blank. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that he was approaching the 15-year point for review by this Board and was encouraged to attend a personal appearance hearing in the Washington D.C. area. The Applicant did not respond.

 Decision

A documentary review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20050428. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Homosexuality - engaged in, attempted to engage in, or solicited another to engage in a homosexual act or acts, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630400.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “I was not given due process as code of conduct now stands. When upgraded I would like the narrative reason box (#28) left blank.”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214
Applicant’s Georgia drivers license

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     890328 - 890821  COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 890822               Date of Discharge: 901227

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 04 06
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 67/57

 Highest Rate: PNSA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NOB*                          Behavior: NOB             OTA: NOB

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

*Not observed

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):
UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Homosexuality - engaged in, attempted to engage in, or solicited another to engage in a homosexual act or acts, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630400.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

900627:  Medical Department: Applicant referred by chaplain. Applicant states he is bisexual and is coming forth now because he is being threatened by crew members and is afraid for his own safety. A: (1) Admission of homosexuality, appearing sincere. (2) Fear of threats. P: Will refer to psychiatry for judgment as to validity of claims. If felt to be true undertake administrative separation.

900627:  Applicant’s Voluntary Statement made to NCIS special agent concerning his homosexuality.

900628:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 83: Fraudulent enlistment on 890822, to wit: false representation that he is not a bisexual when in fact he is; violation of UCMJ, Article 125: Committed four acts of sodomy on diverse occasions with different individuals from Feb90 to Jun90, violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Performed unnatural copulations with different individuals on various occasions from Feb90 to Jun90.
         Award: Forfeiture of $362.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-1. No indication in the record of appeal.

900806:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for separation by reason of homosexuality as evidenced by the Applicant engaging in, attempting to engage in, or soliciting another to engage in a homosexual act or acts and defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry into naval service as evidenced by the Applicant’s admission to being a bisexual and failing to reveal civilian involvement. Applicant advised, that if separation is approved, the least favorable characterization of service may be under other than honorable conditions.
900814:  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27(b), elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.
900928:  An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed homosexual acts and that such acts warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.

901016:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of homosexuality as evidenced by engaging in, attempting to engage in, or soliciting another to engage in a homosexual act or acts and defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry into naval service as evidenced by an admission to being a bisexual and failing to reveal civilian involvement.

901105:  CNMPC directed the Applicant's discharge with under other than honorable conditions by reason of homosexual conduct.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19901227 with an under other than honorable conditions by reason of homosexuality - engaged in, attempted to engage in, or solicited another to engage in a homosexual act or acts homosexual conduct (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1. Normally, to permit relief, an impropriety or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such impropriety or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. The Applicant contends that his discharge is inequitable because he was not given the appropriate due process he would receive under current regulations. Under applicable regulations, a discharge may be deemed inequitable if it is determined policies and procedures under which the Applicant was discharged differ in material respects than current policies and procedures. Furthermore, if these differences represent a substantial enhancement to the Applicant and there is substantial doubt he would have received the same discharge under the current policies and procedures, the Applicant is entitled to relief. At the time of Applicant’s discharge he was properly processed for separation, elected an administrative discharge board and allowed to present his case. The administrative board procedures have not changed substantively since the Applicant’s discharge. The Applicant would be entitled to no greater procedural safeguards than he was afforded at the time of his discharge. Furthermore, the Applicant received an under other than honorable conditions discharge because the facts of his homosexual conduct included certain aggravating facts. Specifically, the evidence suggests that the Applicant engaged in homosexual acts while in public view and aboard a naval installation. The Applicant admitted to homosexual conduct while in a fast food restaurant restroom and in a gym sauna, both occurring aboard a naval installation. Such behavior is still considered aggravating under current regulations and such conduct still merits an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The Board found the Applicant’s contention to be without merit. Relief denied.

 The Applicant requests a narrative reason for separation change. The Applicant was dual processed for separation by reason of homosexuality, and defective enlistment and induction – fraudulent entry. The Applicant’s conduct, warranting separation by reason of homosexuality and defective enlistment and induction – fraudulent entry, is clearly documented in the service record. The separation authority determined that homosexuality most clearly described the reason for discharge. No other Narrative Reason for Separation could more clearly describe why the Applicant was discharged. To change the Narrative Reason Separation would be inappropriate.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), 15 June 1987 until
14 Aug 91, Article 3630400, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF HOMOSEXUALITY.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil” .

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00181

    Original file (ND99-00181.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Homosexuality - engaged in, attempted to engage in, or solicited another to engage in a homosexual act or acts, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630400.The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 (3 copies) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00895

    Original file (ND00-00895.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    970710: BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge with characterization as type warranted by service record by reason of homosexual conduct. b. Homosexual conduct is grounds for separation from the naval service. However, upon receipt of credible information of homosexual conduct (as defined in subparagraph 2d), commanders or appointed inquiry officials may ask members if they engaged in such conduct.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600104

    Original file (ND0600104.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “Honorable Conditions.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. I was only informed that I would receive a honorable discharge, and that is why I have an issue with my separation code, Re-entry code, and narrative reason of discharge.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00163

    Original file (ND03-00163.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Please review my service record. 930310: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed homosexual acts and that such acts warranted separation, and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general). 930324: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general) by reason of misconduct due to commission of a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00142

    Original file (ND04-00142.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “Please review my records to see if my discharge can be upgraded to honorable. In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166, and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in supplement to the Applicant’s petition. 900209: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00023

    Original file (ND99-00023.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    950508: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed homosexual acts and that such acts warranted separation, and recommended discharge General (under Honorable conditions). PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 950807 with a General (under Honorable conditions) by reason of homosexuality – stated he is a homosexual (A). You...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01007

    Original file (ND99-01007.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    851002: CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge as under Honorable conditions (General) by reason of homosexuality. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 851009 under Honorable conditions (General) for homosexuality (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant introduced...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00613

    Original file (ND99-00613.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority determined that homosexuality most clearly described the reason for discharge. To change the Narrative Reason Separation would be inappropriate.In response to applicant’s issue 3, the Board has no obligation to change the applicant's discharge in order to allow him to obtain better employment You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00561

    Original file (ND99-00561.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    870714: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for by reason of commission of a serious offense as evidenced by violation of UCMJ, Article 125 (Sodomy) and homosexuality as evidenced by his statement that he engaged in homosexual acts. 870816: CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge with characterization of other than honorable by reason of homosexual conduct. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00843

    Original file (ND00-00843.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-FR, USN Docket No. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In response to the applicant’s issue, the Board found that the applicant admitted to performing homosexual acts on more than one occasion and also admitted being the individual who initiated the act. ...