Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500700
Original file (MD0500700.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PFC, USMC
Docket No. MD05-00700


Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050316. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20050629. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, an inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall change to: HONORABLE/CONDITION NOT A PHYSICAL OR MENTAL DISABILITY, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6203.2.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “For VA Benefits”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                990910 - 991114  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 991115               Date of Discharge: 001114

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 00 00
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 20                          Years Contracted: 5

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 39

 Highest Rank: PFC                          MOS: 9971

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.2 (2)              Conduct: 4.2 (2)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Rifle Sharpshooter Badge

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/ CONDITION NOT A PHYSICAL OR MENTAL DISABILITY, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6203.2.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

991209:  Branch Medical Clinic, MCRD San Diego, CA: 20 year old complains of right knee pain times 4 days. States pain is to patella. States he has fallen on it 4-5 times, and been hit with a rifle, denies any pain before these events happen. Increase pain with lifting knee.
          Assessment: Knee Strain
         Plan: Pt educated on DX, TX, RX, and follow up. Verbalizes understanding and return if symptoms persist/worsen. Prescribed Motrin 200mg and placed on light duty 2 days.
000118:  Branch Medical Clinic: Lifting foot locker 4 weeks ago, lower back pain, still unable to perform required activity. Left leg gets pain shooting into calf, down to foot, hurts to stretch and jog, hike, etc.
          Assessment: Lower back pain (clinically HNP Left L5/S1)
         Plan: Continue meds and return as necessary.

000328:  Diagnosed by MRI, multilateral disk disease. Patient reports no back problems prior to boot camp. [Extracted from medical record entry dated 000531]

000614:  SMART CENTER: 2 week follow up after returning from boot leave. Residual LBP and stiffness. Anticipate return to full duty 000627 if back OK.

001013:  Orthopedics Consultation: Chief compliant lower back pain since December 1999 – January 2000 while in bootcamp tripped and fell with pain since that time. Improved enough to finish training.
         Re-started training June at SOI, re-occurrence of low back pain, chilopractic no relief, therapy helping.
         Assessment/Plan: Low back pain with L-5, HNP, discussed options with patient and will recommend admin separation at command level.

001017:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct [Diagnosed with herniated disk that hinders your ability to train]. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

001020:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) characterization of service by reason of convenience of the government for a physical condition not a disability, as result of being diagnosed with a herniated disk in lower back.
001020:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

001020:  Commanding Officer, Headquarters and Support Battalion, SOI, Camp Pendleton, recommended Applicant’s general (under honorable conditions) discharge by reason of convenience of the government for a condition not a physical or mental disability.

001023:  Commanding Officer, School of Infantry, MCB, Camp Pendleton, forwarded recommendation for discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) character of service by reason of convenience of the government for a condition not a physical or mental disability. The factual basis for this recommendation was due to numerous medical complaints regarding his lower back pain and a medical evaluation concluding the Applicant had a herniated disk in his lower back.

001102:  CG, Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, directed the Applicant's discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) character of service for convenience of the Government by reason of a physical condition not a disability, i.e., herniated disk.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20001114 with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of convenience of the government due to condition not a physical or mental disability (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper but not equitable (C and D).

Issue 1. When a service member is processed for involuntary discharge based on a condition not a disability, reference (A) indicates that the character of service should be honorable or general (under honorable conditions). A general discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. The Board could find no adverse counselings, nonjudicial punishment proceedings or misconduct to merit a general discharge. The Applicant’s proficiency and conduct marks are sufficient for an honorable characterization of service. Therefore, the Board, finding an inequity, voted to change the Applicant’s character of service to honorable. Relief granted.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E, effective 18 Aug 95 until 31 Aug 2001), paragraph 6203, CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy    Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00836

    Original file (MD02-00836.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00836 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020522, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. He has waived his rights to a Physical Evaluation Board after counseling and is recommended for an administrative separation for Mechanical Lower Back Pain, DNEPTE.010924: Commanding Officer recommended discharge with uncharacterized service by reason of convenience of the government for a condition not a physical or...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00412

    Original file (MD02-00412.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00412 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020225, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to General/Under Honorable Conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 (4 copies) Copy of DD Form 215 (2 copies) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01097

    Original file (MD01-01097.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-01097 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010820, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. 000915: Sports Medicine and Reconditioning Therapy, Injury Report: This pt is a treatment failure. The factual basis for this recommendation was due to medical condition - chronic tendonitis of lower extremities.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00608

    Original file (PD2012-00608.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the low back condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of Service IPEB – Dated 20030515 Condition Code 5293 Rating 10% Herniated Lumbar Disk Combined:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00887

    Original file (MD00-00887.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Assessment: MLPB Plan: 1 - Back school on Wednesday, 2 - Motrin, 3 - Return to clinic if symptoms persist r worsen, 4 - limited duty for 4 days.970331: Applicant acknowledged eligibility but not recommended for promotion to CPL for April because of lack of maturity and lack of military bearing.970422: Medical Eval: Follow-up on concussion. Ask if Pt had any intentions/plan to harm/kill himself which Pt denies emphatically. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01087

    Original file (MD02-01087.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-01087 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020725, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Assessment: History of PFS/ITBS, left knee.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600138

    Original file (MD0600138.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a result, Dr. S_ recommended that PFC M_ be administratively separated since his condition is incompatible with continued service in the Marine Corps.”970311: Commanding Officer, School of Infantry, Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, CA, recommended Applicant’s general (under honorable conditions) discharge by reason of convenience of the government, specifically physical condition not a disability. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation for the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00892

    Original file (MD04-00892.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. I was also told in Separations class that I should recive honorable.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4) DD Form 149, dated October 18, 2001Applicant’s letter to the Board, dated June 29, 2004Six pages from Applicant’s service...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00784

    Original file (MD02-00784.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00784 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020514, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Assessment: Longstanding eustachian tube dysfunction with recurrent otitis media, worse left ear, disqualifying for military service - existed prior to enlistment. 010425: GCMCA [CG, MCB, Camp Pendleton] directed the Applicant's discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the Government due...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00295

    Original file (MD04-00295.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00295 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031201. My whole life was changed as result of this accident and I should have received an honorable discharge under medical conditions. The Applicant’s service record did not contain any unusual circumstances during his time in the military to warrant a change to “honorable.” The official records and the additional documents supplied by the Applicant, do not support his contention of a “cover up”...