Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00836
Original file (MD02-00836.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-PFC, USMC
Docket No. MD02-00836

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020522, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant designated the Veterans of Foreign Wars, Baltimore, MD as the representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030214. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNCHARACTERIZED/ CONDITION NOT A PHYSICAL OR MENTAL DISABILITY, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6203.2.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues, as submitted

 1.The discharge was incorrect. I was informed that my signature to accept this discharge would not bar me from Department of Veterans Affairs Benefits or medical treatment. This is not true. I have also sustained injuries while on active duty that are now being denied treatment.

Submitted by VFW:

Applicant indicated above requested that Veterans of Foreign Wars act as counsel concerning his application. His records were reviewed on 7/25/02 and the following comments are hereby submitted.

We concur with the Applicant's contention that his discharge be upgraded.

We refer this case to the Board for their careful and compassionate consideration and request the Applicant's discharge be reviewed for upgrade to honorable.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
2 Copies of DD Form 214
BCNR's letter to Applicant dtd Apr 16, 2002, returning his application and advising Applicant to petition the NDRB
 VFW's letter to BCNR dtd Feb 18, 2002
 VFW, Baltimore, MD letter to VFW, Washington, DC dtd Dec 20, 2001
Applicant's application (DD Form 149) to BCNR dtd Oct 3, 2001
 Applicant's consent to Dept of VA dtd Dec 17, 2001
 Applicant's Complete Service Record Book

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
          Inactive: USMCR(J)                000203 - 001212  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 001213               Date of Discharge: 011003

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 00 09 21
          Inactive: None
Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 46

 Highest Rank: PFC
Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.1 (2)                       Conduct: 4.1 (2)
Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Rifle Expert Badge
Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNCHARACTERIZED/CONDITION NOT A PHYSICAL OR MENTAL DISABILITY, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6203.2.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

010403:  Counseled for deficiencies: diagnosed physical condition not a disability, (back injury) and any resultant or aggravated condition which interferes with the effective performance of duties. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

010411:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with uncharacterized service by reason of convenience of the government for a physical condition not a disability.
010411:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
010503:  Limited Duty Medical Board Report: Diagnosis - lower back pain. Fell on back during run on O-course in Boot Camp. Treatment: Sports MED therapy, podiatry and chiropractor treatment. Limitations: no heavy lifting greater than 10 lbs, no daily physical training. Placed on limited duty for period of eight months.
010829:  Dropped from training due to back pain.

 010904:  CO, NavHosp, Camp Lejeune Recommendation: 18 year old male with history of Lower Back Pain since boot camp. He has been unable to complete ITB training and has not responded to treatment with light duty, medication, Sports Medicine Rehabilitation, Chiropractic care, and treatment at the Pain Clinic. Member will be unable to complete the rigors of SOI training. He has waived his rights to a Physical Evaluation Board after counseling and is recommended for an administrative separation for Mechanical Lower Back Pain, DNEPTE.

010924:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge with uncharacterized service by reason of convenience of the government for a condition not a physical or mental disability. The factual basis for this recommendation was due to his physical condition identified by Medical Officer's letter of 4 Sep 91. Commanding Officer’s comments (verbatim): PFC (Applicant) possesses a medical condition (Mechanical Lower Back Pain, DNEPTE) which is so severe as to impair his ability to complete his required entry level training. Consequently, PFC (Applicant) does not possess the physical ability to continue active service in the Marine Corps.

010927:  GCMCA [CO, School of Infantry, Training Command] directed the Applicant's discharge with an uncharacterized service by reason of physical condition not a disability.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 011003 with uncharacterized service by reason of convenience of the government due to condition not a physical or mental disability (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).
Issue 1. With respect to non-service related administrative matters, an uncharacterized separation is considered the equivalent of an honorable or general (under honorable conditions) characterization. The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans’ benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A.       Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E, effective 18 Aug
95), paragraph 6203, CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT .
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                   Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                   Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01087

    Original file (MD02-01087.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-01087 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020725, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Assessment: History of PFS/ITBS, left knee.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01147

    Original file (MD02-01147.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-01147 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020805, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was administratively separated on 011004 with an uncharacterized discharge by reason of convenience of the government due to a condition not a physical or mental disability (A). By regulation, members...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00864

    Original file (MD02-00864.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00864 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020603, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. 000919: Orthopedic Clinic, Naval Hospital Camp Lejeune, NC: medical evaluation of ankle sprain. The Applicant's Commanding Officer, therefore, was required to issue an uncharacterized discharge unless the Applicant's service record indicated unusual meritorious personal conduct or performance of military duty.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00892

    Original file (MD04-00892.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. I was also told in Separations class that I should recive honorable.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4) DD Form 149, dated October 18, 2001Applicant’s letter to the Board, dated June 29, 2004Six pages from Applicant’s service...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01180

    Original file (MD03-01180.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. IF MEMBER IS UNABLE TO TRAIN AND RETURNS FOR SAME CONDITION MEMBER IS RECOMMENDED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION FOR THE GOOD OF THE USMC.”000518: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of convenience of the government for a physical condition not a disability. MCO P1900.16 requires the characterization...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01097

    Original file (MD01-01097.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-01097 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010820, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. 000915: Sports Medicine and Reconditioning Therapy, Injury Report: This pt is a treatment failure. The factual basis for this recommendation was due to medical condition - chronic tendonitis of lower extremities.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00680

    Original file (MD04-00680.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. My medical records will show that prior to enlistment my physical condition was prime and prior to discharge it was less than acceptable for Marine Corps standards, which is why I was discharged (because of service connected disabilities) I now receive 20% compensation.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500606

    Original file (MD0500606.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant's service record did not contain any unusual circumstances during his less than six months in the military to warrant a change of discharge to honorable. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00180

    Original file (MD03-00180.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was told that in order to have anything done about my knees, I would need to upgrade my discharge.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR (J) 000823 - 010521 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 010522 Date of Discharge: 011129 Length of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00467

    Original file (MD02-00467.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00467 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020226, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Dear Chairperson:After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of the evidence assembled for review, we continue to note the contentions as set forth by the appellant as follows; an upgrade of the...