Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01317
Original file (ND04-01317.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-EM3, USN
Docket No. ND04-01317

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 20040810, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20050214. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was 4 to 1 that the character of the discharge shall not change and 3 to 2 that the narrative reason for separation shall not change. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO MILITARY SERVICE, DRUG ABUSE, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-134 (formerly 3630100).




PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“1. Please consider subpar1j(A), CO, USS Devastator (MCM 6) statement to upgrade my discharge to Honorable.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s Discharge Package (5 pages)
NCIS Report of Investigation, dated July 10, 2003 (14 pages)
Report of Medical Examination, dated September 9, 2003
Statement from Applicant
Letter from Applicant, dated January 10, 2005
Applicant’s Form DD-214 (2 copies)
Letter from Applicant dated January 19, 2005

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     990522 - 990527  COG
         Active: USN                        990528 - 021023  HON

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 021024               Date of Discharge: 031031

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 00 08
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 24                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 71

 Highest Rate: EM3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NMF*                          Behavior: NMF             OTA: NMF

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, GCM, SSDR

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

*No marks found in service record

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO MILITARY SERVICE, DRUG ABUSE, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-134 (formerly 3630100).

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

021024:  Applicant reenlisted this date for a period of four years.

 030620:  Applicant provided a sworn statement to NCIS investigators in which he admitted to wrongful use of a controlled substance on two occasions during his first enlistment.

030902:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry, drug abuse. Applicant notified that if discharge is approved, the least favorable characterization of service possible is general (under honorable conditions).

030902:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27(b), elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
030915:  Commanding Officer recommended a waiver and retention for processing by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry into the military service, drug abuse. Commanding Officer’s comments (verbatim): “Petty Officer R_ was under investigation by the Naval Criminal Investigative Service for possession of a pipe commonly considered as drug paraphernalia. It was later determined that the pipe was actually the property of his spouse, whom he is currently in the process of seeking a divorce, was placed in his household goods shipment without his knowledge. However, during the course of the investigation, Petty Officer R_ admitted to using marijuana. His usage occurred over a year ago, during his previous enlistment.

         Due to the timeline of the offense, the fact it had happened under his previous enlistment, and he tested negative to all drug testing while on board, I have not initiated Nonjudicial punishment.

         In the short time Petty Officer R_ has been on board, his performance has been nothing short of spectacular. The knowledge and experience he has brought with him has had an incredibly positive influence in his division and throughout his department. Although he displayed a lack of good judgment during an extremely stressful time of his life, and I would like to retain him on board, I am required to follow Naval personnel regulations and initiative separation procedures.

         I feel Petty Officer R_ has enormous potential that has yet to be tapped which would be beneficial to himself, my ship, and the United States Navy. I most strongly recommend a waiver be granted for Petty Officer R_, allowing him to continue what promises to be an outstanding Naval career.”

030922:  Commander, Mine Countermeasures Squadron TWO, forwarded Commanding Officer’s waiver request, does not concur with waiver recommendation.

031009:  Commander, Mine Warfare Command, directed the Applicant's discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry into the military service, drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20031031 with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry into the military service, drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1: Normally, to permit relief, an impropriety or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such impropriety or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. The Applicant contends that he served the United States well and he is entitled to an upgrade. When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. A general discharge is warranted for behavior not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. T he Applicant’s service was marred by a fraudulent enlistment in which he failed to disclose his drug use from a prior enlistment. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy. Such conduct falls far short of that expected of a member of the U.S. military and does not meet the requirements for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 Aug 2002 until Present, Article 1910-134 (previously 3630100), Separation by Reason of Defective Enlistments and Inductions – Fraudulent Entry Into the Naval Service.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil” .

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00014

    Original file (ND03-00014.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4 (2 copies)) Twenty-six pages from Applicant's service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 011210 - 020115 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 020116 Date of Discharge: 020404 Length of Service (years,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01013

    Original file (ND03-01013.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was taken to Captain’s Mast, where the CO found me guilty I was awarded reduction in rate to E-2 and discharge from the Naval Service. During the time I was in the Navy I received three evaluations. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copies of DD Form 214 (2) Copies from Service Record (5 pages) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501021

    Original file (ND0501021.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Fifteen pages from applicant’s service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20000323 - 20000727 COG Active: None Period of Service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500164

    Original file (ND0500164.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND05-00164 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20040929, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. I was, however, discharged from the Naval Reserve on 24JUN04. No indication of appeal in the record.020927: Released from active duty to Naval Reserve to serve until Reserve Obligation Termination Date 2006APR23 by reason of “Completion of Required Active Service, having served 4 years of active duty.” Received...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500508

    Original file (ND0500508.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Applicant indicated that he did not tell his recruiter at MEPS regarding his pre-service drug use and involvement with civilian authorities.031210: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent enlistment as evidenced by failure to disclose pre-service civil convictions/involvement and pre-service drug use. The Applicant's service record did not contain any unusual...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01175

    Original file (ND02-01175.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-CTM3, USN Docket No. Recommend CTM3 M_ W_ (Applicant) be separated from military service with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization based on fraudulent enlistment." The Applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00782

    Original file (ND99-00782.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Letter from applicant, dated April 7, 1999. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :980403: Letter of intent to deny eligibility for a security clearance. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600113

    Original file (ND0600113.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:“I formally request that my Narrative Reason for Separation be changed from “Fraudulent Entry into Military” with Separation Code of “JDA” and Reentry Code of “RE-4” be changed to “Defective Enlistment Agreement” with the appropriate Separation Code of “KDS” and Reentry Code of “RE-3” in accordance with DOD Directives 1332.14 (E3. Thus far none has been presented by the initiating Command or Investigative Command, and I...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01003

    Original file (ND03-01003.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-AOAA, USN Docket No. ND03-01003 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20030522, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. 920907: Commanding Officer recommended discharge with an under other than honorable conditions by reason of defective enlistment and induction into the Naval...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00482

    Original file (ND02-00482.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 021115. 960411: Additional waiver granted for 1 non minor misdemeanor.961112: Defense Investigation Service reported to command of applicant's pre-service drug use that occurred on 23 Dec 91 while on active service in the United States Army. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 970314 with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of...