Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01013
Original file (ND03-01013.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-SN, USN
Docket No. ND03-01013

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 20030516, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040415. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO MILITARY SERVICE, DRUG ABUSE, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-134 (formerly 3630100).

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

 1. “I originally applied for enlistment in the Navy in July 1999, in Frankfurt, Germany. As part of my enlistment processing I was asked if I had ever used illegal/illicit drugs. I informed my recruiter that I had smoked marijuana in high school. He told me that I would have to get a drug waiver, but that it was “no big deal.” When I was filling out the paperwork for the waiver he instructed me to put down that I had only used marijuana “two or three times.” While I knew that statement was false, my recruiter told me “it was okay,” and not to worry about it.

In January/February 2002 MAT R_ K_(Command Master-at-Arms, SIMA Ingleside) approached me and informed me that I was under investigation. When I asked him what I was being investigated for, he informed me that it was drugs. I immediately informed him that I didn’t use drugs and offered to take a urinalysis test. He questioned me about my drug waiver and the marijuana I used in high school (without informing me of my right to keep silent). He was asking for extremely specific information (dates I used it, where I used it, who I was with, etc...). I told him I didn’t remember the information he was requesting (and I don’t, it’s been four or five years). He called me a liar and, laughing, said “that’s not what you told NCIS.” He then sent me to the barracks, told me to stay there, and said we would talk later. From that date on I was assigned menial duties, such as taking out the garbage, cleaning windows, landscaping, etc. I was no longer allowed to work in my rate. He continued to harass and berate me until 1 finally made something up to “get him off my back.” He told me that he was going to throw me out of the Navy with a BCD, and give me jail time. When I asked for legal representation MAJ K_ informed me that the Navy would not provide it for me.

I had never been to Captain’s Mast or received any Page 13 counseling sessions, but I was still scared that I would get a BCD and/or go to jail. MA1 K_ placed me on report for fraudulent enlistment. I was taken to Captain’s Mast, where the CO found me guilty I was awarded reduction in rate to E-2 and discharge from the Naval Service. I went to MA1 K_’s office, as instructed prior to mast, and waited for him.

When MA1 K_ came into his office, he informed me that the CO was thinking about retaining me in Naval Service. I told him that I wanted to stay in the Navy. He went back in to see the CO and when he came back to his office, he informed me that the CO was going to discharge me.

During the time I was in the Navy I received three evaluations. Prior to receiving an evaluation from SIMA my evaluations were “Meets Standards” or “Progressing,” with no “Below Standards” marks. My evaluation from SIMA was an overall 1.83, based upon my dealings with MA1 K_.

While I understand that I signed a fraudulent document, I was not a drug user when I entered the service, nor did I use any illicit substances during my military service. I feel that I was unfairly “railroaded” into a General Discharge, and that, had MA1 K_ not abused his authority, and informed me of my rights prior to questioning me, I would still be a productive member of the Navy, as I was prior to my dealing with MA1 K_.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copies of DD Form 214 (2)
Copies from Service Record (5 pages)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     990624 - 990819  COG
         Active: USN                        None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 990820               Date of Discharge: 020325

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 07 06
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4 (12 months extension)

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 44

 Highest Rate: SN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.00 (3)    Behavior: 2.33 (3)                OTA: 2.33

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO MILITARY SERVICE, DRUG ABUSE, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-134 (formerly 3630100).

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

990624:  Application for Enlistment (DD Form 1966): Applicant failed to disclose the full extent of his drug usage.
020214:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 83: Fraudulent enlistment, violation of UCMJ Article 107: False official statement.
         Award: Forfeiture of $654.00 pay per month for 1 month, reduction to E-2. No indication of appeal in the record.
020215:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with a general (under honorable conditions by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry, drug abuse.
020215:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

020318:  Commanding Officer authorized applicant discharged with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry into the military service, drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20020325 with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry into the military service, drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1: The Applicant contends that he served the United States well and he is entitled to an upgrade. When the service of a member of U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. A General discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member's conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. T he Applicant’s service was marred by nonjudicial punishment for making a f alse official statement at the time of enlistment concerning his drug use, thus creating a fraudulent enlistment. While the Applicant may feel he was “railroaded in receiving a General discharge”, the Applicant was properly notified of the discharge action, including the right to counsel. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 32, effective 26 Apr 01 until 21 Aug 2002, Article 1910-134 (previously 3630100), Separation by Reason of Defective Enlistments and Inductions – Fraudulent Entry Into the Naval Service.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.



PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00053

    Original file (ND04-00053.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I am requesting that my RE-4 be changed to an RE-1 and that my Interservice Separation Code be changed from a 74 to 99, or another code that will allow me to get back in. Please change my DD 214 to allow me to serve my country with pride.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Ten pages from Applicant’s service/medical records Applicant’s statement, dated April 16, 2003 PART...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00616

    Original file (ND04-00616.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Thank you for your time in reading this letter and please consider my request.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 940713 - 950705 COG Active: USN None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 950706 Date of Discharge: 970430 Length of Service (years, months,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600301

    Original file (ND0600301.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application and attached letter: “ I would like to have my re-entry code changed to RE-1 so that I may have the opportunity to re-enlist.” “Dear Sirs: This is to correct my Navy record so that I may once again begin a military career. By regulation, members notified of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01071

    Original file (ND03-01071.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :990312: USN Alcohol and Drug Abuse Screening Certificate (NAVCRUIT 1133/7): Applicant failed to disclose pre-service criminal activity, police record.990528: Commanding Officer, Recruit Training Command authorized Applicant’s discharge with an uncharacterized service by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry. By regulation, members discharged within the first 180 days of enlistment are given a service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01301

    Original file (ND02-01301.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01301 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20020911, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. As the representative, we ask that consideration be given to equitable relief, as this is a matter that involves a determination whether a discharge should be changed under the equity standards, to include any issue upon which the applicant submits to the Board’s discretionary authority,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00682

    Original file (ND01-00682.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. I would like an upgrade also because I was granted a security clearance on the knowledge of my experimental drug use and during my 2 and 1/2 years of military service all of my drug tests were negative. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00014

    Original file (ND03-00014.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4 (2 copies)) Twenty-six pages from Applicant's service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 011210 - 020115 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 020116 Date of Discharge: 020404 Length of Service (years,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500326

    Original file (ND0500326.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You will also notice that once my statement was submitted no action was taken. It was quoted to me by administrative Navy personnel, "Since everything happened on your first enlistment, your second enlistment wipes your slate clean.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 980205 -...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500750

    Original file (ND0500750.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO MILITARY SERVICE, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-134 (formerly 3630100). PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00660

    Original file (ND03-00660.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00660 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20030304, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to Convenience of the Government. On page two, item k, Separation Authority Action: it states my discharge should have been ‘characterized as General Under Honorable Conditions, based on fraudulent entry into the naval service.’ My DD-214 does not reflect the recommendation...