Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01114
Original file (ND04-01114.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-DCFA, USN
Docket No. ND04-01114

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20040701. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20041112. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “My name is A_ J_ Jr I am writing in hope to get my discharged changed from other than Honorable to a General under Honorable conditions. I was young and stupid and I made mistakes. I am older now and I have a family that I want to take care of and provide a good life for. I am a Lt on Madison Vol Fire Department and vice president of the board of Directors. Right now I work in the coal mines but I would like to persue a job in law enforcement. Something my wife and kids can be proud of. I can not persue a job with the state or country unless I can get my discharged changed. If there is anyway possible for you to change this I would be very grateful.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Reference Letter from Chief, G_ W. T_, Madison Volunteer Fire Department

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     910607 - 910612  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 910613               Date of Discharge: 930507

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 10 25
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 42

 Highest Rate: DCFN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2.80 (2)    Behavior: 2.80 (2)                OTA: 2.80

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, BATTLE ”E” RIBBON

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

930331:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongfully use a controlled substance, to wit: LSD.
Award: Forfeiture of $400.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-2. No indication of appeal in the record.
930405:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by service record entries [Extracted from CO’s message].

930405:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights [Extracted from CO’s message].

930412:  DAPA screening indicates Applicant admitted to using LSD on one occasion, denies regular use of illicit drugs, uses alcohol on occasional basis.

930412:  Medical Officer’s evaluation determined Applicant to be not drug or alcohol dependent, considered not eligible, nor amenable to treatment, recommended for separation not via VA hospital [Extracted from CO’s message].
930416:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by service record entries.

930423:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19930507 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. Relief denied.
The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an inequity or impropriety must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such inequity or impropriety occurred during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, to enhance employment opportunities, or for good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle, are examples of verifiable documentation that may be provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The Applicant’s evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate his misconduct sufficient to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.







Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 5/93, effective 05 Mar 93 until 21 Jul 94, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00124

    Original file (ND99-00124.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Applicant’s Special Request dtd 12 Apr 93 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 910506 - 910508 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 910509 Date of Discharge: 930618 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 01 10 Inactive:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00808

    Original file (ND02-00808.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A direct violation of Article 86 of the UCMJ), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning. No indication of appeal in the record.930723: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by CO's NJP held on 930722.930723: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00168

    Original file (ND03-00168.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I made a mistake while in the U.S. Navy. 000204: Applicant returned to military authority at NACIC, at 1530, 000204.000210: Applicant returned to USS DWIGHT D EISENHOWER (CVN 69) at 1425, 000210 (161 days)000613: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146.Discharge package missing from service record. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation for the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01090

    Original file (ND01-01090.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    My life now, nine years later, could not be better. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 900503 - 900724 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 900725 Date of Discharge: 920717 Length of Service (years, months, days): Active: 01 11 23 Inactive: None...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00722

    Original file (ND99-00722.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s issue 1, the applicant implies that a permissive doctrine exists whereby one in the military is allowed a “single misdeed”. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 5/93, effective 05 Mar 93 until 21 Jul 94, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00858

    Original file (ND00-00858.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00858 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000705, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. My discharge was inequitable and I don't believe I deserved the discharge I received because one incident in my 12 months of service. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00229

    Original file (ND03-00229.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. “I was discharged from the U.S. Navy under other than honorable conditions due to the use of drugs. No indication of appeal in the record.960510: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by nonjudicial punishment of 960509 for violation of Article 112A of the Uniform...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00821

    Original file (ND00-00821.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I have been drug free all my life and because of 2 uses of LSD, I earned a OTH discharge for life. found in service record. I have been drug free all my life and because of 2 uses of LSD, I earned a OTH discharge for life.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00871

    Original file (ND99-00871.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Member signed page 13 accepting Level III treatment for drug abuse. Service member will be administratively separated after completion of Level III treatment for both alcohol and drugs. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In response to applicant’s issue 1, the applicant implies that a permissive doctrine exists whereby one in the military is allowed...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00546

    Original file (ND02-00546.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00546 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020318, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. 930202: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than...