Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01160
Original file (ND03-01160.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-SK2, USN
Docket No. ND03-01160

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030625. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040812. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-152 (formerly Article 3630550).






PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

 1. “I believe my discharge was improper. I was discharged for Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure. I was not aware of the additional change of being intoxicated on the Firing Range. I was definitely NOT intoxicated on the firing range. The blood test was .01 and the Corpsman at the hospital said that it could have been anything from the alcohol swab used to draw blood to shaving lotion or even mouthwash. I am not disputing the discharge for Rebab failure because I did have 4 beers the evening before going to the firing range. The last beer I had was at approximately 2030 and I arrived at the firing range at approximately 0715 the next morning. I was not given the opportunity for a Breathalyzer test on the firing range at approximately 0800 when I was confronted by BUC W_ W_. I was transported to the hospital at approximately 1000 for a blood test. I was given the results of the test, .01. If I had known that I was being discharged for being intoxicated on the firing range, I definitely would have challenged it. I had plenty of witnesses. JAG was not offered to me at any time.

All I 'm asking for is that my discharge to be upgraded to Honorable so that I may seek better employment and educational opportunities.

Thank you for your time,

C_ M. B_ ( Applicant )
( Applicant 's address deleted)
( Applicant 's telephone number deleted)”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Statement from Applicant, dated June 16, 2003
Applicant’s DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     941114 - 950801  COG
         Active: USN                        950802 - 000626  HON

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 000627               Date of Discharge: 020903

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 02 07
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 23                          Years Contracted: 3

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 47

 Highest Rate: SK2

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2.75 (4)    Behavior: 2.75 (4)                OTA: 2 .97

 Military Decorations: GCA, PMR

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NUC, NER, NDSM (2), AFEM, SSDR (2)

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-152 (formerly Article 3630550).
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

011030:  Alcohol dependency screening: A/P: ETOH dependency. Low risk of withdrawal sx. (1) Residential treatment would be appropriate. (2) Return to CAAC/DAPA.
020128:  Applicant entered into partial hospitalization at the Naval Addictions Rehabilitation and Education Department (NARED) with a diagnosis of alcohol dependence.

020219:  Applicant discharge from NARED. Diagnsosis: Alcohol dependence. Applicant to be placed in one year recovery program.

020828:  Commander, THIRTIETH Naval Construction Regiment directed the Applicant's discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure.

 Parts of Applicant’s discharge package missing from service record.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20020903 with a general (under honorable conditions) due to alcohol rehabilitation failure (A). After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (B and C). The Board applied the presumption of regularity of governmental affairs in this case in the absence of a complete discharge package (D).

Issue 1: Applicant contends his discharge was the result of an alcohol incident at the shooting range. Applicant was discharged under the provisions of MILPERSMAN 1910-152, Alcohol Rehab Failure. The record indicates that at the time of Applicant’s discharge, he had been diagnosed as alcohol dependent and he was participating in an alcohol treatment aftercare program. The record further indicates that Applicant admitted to violating this program by drinking four beers the night prior to the shooting range incident.

In the Applicant’s case, the Board could discern no impropriety or inequity and therefore considered the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. A characterization of service of general (under honorable conditions) is warranted when significant negative aspects of the member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh positive aspects of the member’s service record. The Applicant’s willful violation of his aftercare program clearly reflects the Applicant ’ s disobedience of the orders and directives that regulate good order and discipline in the naval service, and demonstrated he was unsuitable for further service. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate. Relief denied.
The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits not the Navy Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.




Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 27, effective
27 Mar 2000 until 21 Aug 2002, Article 1910-152 (formerly Article 3630550), SEPARATION BY REASON OF ALCOHOL ABUSE REHABILITATION

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.
D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00033

    Original file (ND04-00033.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to “FAILURE TO PROMOTE.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The captain came to me later and gave me a direct order not to give any information concerning issues that might arise behind the security door of SSES. The summary of service clearly documents that alcohol rehabilitation failure was the reason the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501217

    Original file (ND0501217.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested that a documentary discharge review board change his characterization of service, received at the time of discharge to honorable. Therefore, only the service and medical records were reviewed. In the Applicant’s case, the record clearly documents his treatment failure (alcohol related incident) following the completion of outpatient alcohol rehabilitation.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500530

    Original file (ND0500530.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Commanding Officer’s comments: Member met the criteria for separation under the provisions of MILPERSMAN 1910-152, Separation by Reasons of Alcohol Abuse Rehabilitation Failure. The record further reveals that the Applicant completed Level I CAAC alcohol rehabilitation treatment on 20000302 for serious alcohol incidents including showing up late to watch with alcohol on his breath and an arrest for public lewdness and public intoxication. The names, and votes of the members of the Board...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00129

    Original file (ND00-00129.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I (applicant), am requesting to change my discharge of General Under Honorable Conditions to Honorable Conditions I feel my discharge was inequitable because it was based on an isolated incident. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 980605 with a general (under honorable conditions) due to alcohol rehabilitation failure (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00605

    Original file (ND01-00605.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00605 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010402, requested that the reason for the discharge be changed. The summary of service clearly documents that alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure was the reason the applicant was discharged. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 Dec 97 until Present, Article 1910-152 (formerly Article 3630550), SEPARATION BY REASON OF ALCOHOL ABUSE REHABILITATION.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00042

    Original file (ND99-00042.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I direct Personnel Support Activity Detachment, Great Lakes separate SR (Applicant) from the naval service with a discharge characterized as an Entry Level Separation." After a thorough review of the records, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In issue 1, the applicant states that he “disputes the reason for my Naval discharge as Alcohol Rehabilitation failure on the grounds it is incorrect”. The applicant

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00673

    Original file (ND04-00673.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable, the reason for the discharge be changed to “alcohol abuse,” and “I respectfully request for the Board to take into consideration of changing my re-Entry code based upon my perseverance and dedication to making things right in my life with the Navy.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. However, due to his failure to follow his medically prescribed and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00821

    Original file (ND01-00821.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00821 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010601, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 990510 with a general (under honorable conditions) due to alcohol rehabilitation failure (A). PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00498

    Original file (ND02-00498.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation Only the service and medical records were reviewed, as the Applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider. A characterization of service of under honorable conditions (general) is warranted when significant negative aspects of a service member’s conduct or performance outweigh the positive aspects of the service member’s military record. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 27, effective 27 Mar 2000 until Present, Article...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00247

    Original file (ND02-00247.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the Applicant, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Recommendations: ...alcohol dependence, continue AA meetings.980807: Final Evaluation Report states Applicant refused alcohol treatment.980812: DD Form 214: Honorable due to alcohol rehabilitation failure, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-152.Discharge package missing from service record. ...