Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01043
Original file (ND03-01043.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-DCFR, USN
Docket No. ND03-01043

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030527. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040423. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600).

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“1. I do not want my discharge to interfere with future employment opportunities. I would like to go back to active duty.”

 “Dear Navy Discharge Review Board:

My name is C_ J L_. I received an Other Than Honorable Discharge on August 26 th 2002 from the United States Navy. I was a Damage Controlman “A” School Graduate and I was on active duty from September 26th 2000 until August 26th 2002. I went to Captain’s Mast 3 times for Unauthorized Absences, Insubordination, and a few other minor mistakes. It is my opinion that I was only discharged because I told my upper chain of command I wanted to be discharged. I have made a mistake and I would like to fix my mistake. I would like to come back to active duty and serve in the Navy as a career, not just a job. I will never cause anymore problems, and I will repay any debts owed to the United States Navy.

Since my discharge in August 2002, I have not been in any trouble with the Police. I have no debts other than what I owe Defense Finance and Accounting Service for my enlistment bonus. I have kept a full time job the entire time at Sesame Solutions LLC. I have bought and paid for a house and car. I am single with no children. I am still in excellent health. I have had no major illnesses. I have learned to drive a Forklift and have received training as a Machine Operator in an industrial environment. I have been doing well since my discharge. However my discharge is a shame to me and I would like to fix my mistakes and repay my debts to the military. I apologize to the Commanding Officer of the U.S.S. Dubuque Captain B_ J. M_ and my entire chain of command.

I would like to have my discharge upgraded so I can rejoin the Navy and pursue a long and healthy career with the United States Armed Forces”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, NO DISCHARGE PACKAGE AVAILABLE, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
Copy of Form 611-1-2-R-E (AFQT Percentile)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     000809 - 000924  COG
         Active: USN                        None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 000925               Date of Discharge: 020826

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 11 02
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4 (12 months extension)

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 58

 Highest Rate: DCFA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2.00 (1)    Behavior: 1.00 (0)                OTA: 1.67

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NAVY”E”, NDSM, SSDR

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 3

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600).

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

020405:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (You have failed to adhere to the rules of the UCMJ evidenced by your conviction at CO’s NJP for violation of UCMJ Articles 107, 90, 92, 86.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

020405:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 107: False official statement, violation of UCMJ, Article 90: Willful disobedience of a superior commissioned officer, violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Failure to obey a lawful order.
         Award: Forfeiture of $649.50 pay per month for 2 month(s), restriction and extra duty for45 days, reduction to E-1. No indication of appeal in the record.
020412:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (You have failed to adhere to the rules of the UCMJ evidenced by your conviction at CO’s NJP for violation of UCMJ Articles 86.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

020412:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Restriction breaking.
         Award: Forfeiture of $577.75 pay per month for 2 months. No indication of appeal in the record.
020722:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (You have failed to adhere to the rules of the UCMJ evidenced by your conviction at CO’s NJP for violation of UCMJ Articles 86.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

020722:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: UA from 020708 to 020711 (3 days/R).
Award: Forfeiture of $578.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 30 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
NO DISCHARGE PACKAGE AVAILABLE

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20020826 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A). In the absence of a discharge package, the Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B) and, after a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1: In the Applicant’s case, the Board could discern no impropriety or inequity and therefore considered the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. A characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions is warranted when the service member’s conduct constitutes a significant departure from that expected of a Sailor. The Applicant’s service record is marred by award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on three separate occasions thus substantiating the misconduct . The Applicant’s summary of service clearly reflects the Applicant ’ s disobedience of the orders and directives that regulate good order and discipline in the naval service, and demonstrated he was unsuitable for further service. An upgrade to honorable or general (under honorable conditions) would be inappropriate. Relief denied.

 There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. E vidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities, are examples of verifiable documents that should be provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. At this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient verifiable documentation of good character and conduct to mitigate his misconduct while on active duty.

Concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 Aug 2002 until Present, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600), SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00802

    Original file (ND03-00802.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The NDRB also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01463

    Original file (MD03-01463.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I believe my discharge was based on the only misconduct in my record. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Issue 1: The Board found the Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The Applicant is reminded he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00989

    Original file (ND02-00989.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Employment Reference Letter from SMI International dated June 18, 2002 Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 950808 - 951204 COG Active: None. Age at Entry: 19 Years Contracted: 4 (24 months extension)...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00842

    Original file (ND02-00842.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I would like to say to you at this time that i did make some mistakes while i was in the navy, but being in debt is apart of every day life for civilians and military personnel every where. No indication of appeal in the record.990114: Vacate suspended forfeiture of 716.85 for 2 months and reduction to EOCN.990114: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Failure to obey order or regulation by failing to pay just debts, violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Check, worthless, making and uttering -...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00450

    Original file (ND04-00450.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. 020815: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00364

    Original file (ND00-00364.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although many mistakes were made during my enlistment from 1988-1991, I feel that overall my time served in the U.S. Navy is deserving of an honorable discharge.In 1989 I attended and completed search and rescue surface swimmer training in San Diego, California. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board determined this...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00459

    Original file (ND00-00459.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    911127: Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Consumed alcoholic beverage while under the age of twenty-one and incapacitated for proper performance of duty. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In response to the applicant’s issue, the Board appreciates that the applicant realizes that going on unauthorized absence was wrong and that he regrets...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00830

    Original file (ND01-00830.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 850524 - 850802 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 850803 Date of Discharge: 880408 Length of Service (years, months, days): Active: 02 08...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500490

    Original file (ND0500490.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION It has been my dream, since I was very young, to defend my country by serving in the military.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00550

    Original file (ND02-00550.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I have worked in the same field since leaving the Navy and I'm responsible for my actions.I'm asking to have my discharge upgraded because I was so young and made mistakes but my hope is to not have this held against me my whole life. No indication of appeal in the record.910520: USS PUGET SOUND (AD 38) notified Applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and alcohol abuse rehabilitation...