Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00946
Original file (ND03-00946.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-AEAA, USN
Docket No. ND03-00946

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030507. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a personal appearance hearing before the board in the Washington National Capital Region. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

 Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040728. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630650.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “I am submitting this document with hopes of getting a Oth upgraded to a honorable. I feel my Discharge that was giving to me was inadequate to the crime that was committed to the penalty served for the crime.

 2. To Whom It May Concern,

There are things in life that some people regret, and things that most people don’t. but the purpose of this letter is a regretful letter with intention of trying to bury my past and move ahead to bigger and better things. I had the best intention of being a 4.0 sailor no matter what duty station I was at, but being a young man and away from home really made me think that life was a big party, and that is all I ever did was party, and when I look back and try to put what I did into perspective I whis I had another chance, and that other chance may be right around the corner. Alot has happened to me since my discharge from the United States Navy, upon my arrival back to my hometown of LaPorte Indiana my old wrestling coach had asked me to become a assistant for one of our middle schools, Igladly accepted and even took on a assistant football job at the other middle school, To this day I am still coaching , but at the varsity level, and have been there for 5 years with great numbers and a positive influence on our future. I would be lying if I said that that these kids haven’t changed my outlook on life, cause they sure have. Which is why I am currently seeking a college education to become a teacher and continue my coaching, not only for the kids but for my fianc é and my daughter because they deserve much more from me, I owe it to myself to try and better the kids of the future, to learn a great work ethic and to be more respectful to our country. Belive it when I say that I ‘am a changed man, I need to get a discharge review and hopefully a upgrade to move on with my life, get a nice house, a better job, and a bigger family, I will make a diffrence and will not let no one down anymore. I am submitting 2 letter-of-reccomendation to maybe help you with a descion.G0 USA!

Respectfully Yours,

B_ A_ D_ ( Applicant )”






 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Character reference from Principal, Laporte High School, dated October 23, 2002
Character reference from General Manager, Holiday Inn Express, dated October 10, 2002

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     900718 - 901210  COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 901210               Date of Discharge: 941230

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 04 00 20 (Does not exclude lost time)
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 42

 Highest Rate: AEAN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.16 (5)    Behavior: 3.08 (5)                OTA: 3.32

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SSDR, SASM with 1 Bronze Star, BEA

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 39

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630650.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

930824:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Fail to go to appointed place of duty on 0700-1530, 930814.
         Award: Forfeiture of $200 per month for 1 month, extra duty for 30 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
940525:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Fail to be at appointed place of duty on 1715, 940415 to 0718, 940416.
         Award: Restriction and extra duty for 30 days, reduction to AEAA. No indication of appeal in the record.
941014:  Applicant to unauthorized absence 0730, 941014.

 941104:  Applicant from unauthorized absence 2235, 941104 (21 days/apprehended).
941107:  Applicant to unauthorized absence 0700, 941107 .

941114:  Applicant from unauthorized absence 0730, 941114 (7 days/surrendered).

941114:  Applicant from unauthorized absence 0730, 941114 (31 day/surrendered).

941118:  Applicant to unauthorized absence 0700, 941118.

941129:  Applicant from unauthorized absence 1100, 941129 (11 days/ apprehended).

941230:  DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable in lieu of a trial by court martial, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630650.

 Applicant’s separation package missing from service record.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19941230 under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial (A and B). In the absence of a discharge package, the Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C) and, after a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

 Issue 1: In the Applicant’s case, the Board could discern no impropriety or inequity and therefore considered the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. A characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions is warranted when the service member’s conduct constitutes a significant departure from that expected of a Sailor. The Applicant’s service record is marred by award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on two separate occasions and subsequent periods of unauthorized warranting a trial by court martial, thus substantiating the misconduct . The Applicant’s summary of service clearly reflects the Applicant ’ s disobedience of the orders and directives that regulate good order and discipline in the naval service, and demonstrated he was unsuitable for further service. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate. Relief denied.

The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities as requested in the issue. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge.

There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. E vidence of continuing educational pursuits, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities, are examples of verifiable documents that should be provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The Board commends the Applicant for his dedication to today’s youth through coaching football. However, at this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient verifiable documentation of good character and conduct to mitigate his misconduct while on active duty

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective
22 Jul 94 until 2 Oct 96, Article 3630650, PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING ENLISTED PERSONNEL FOR SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURTMARTIAL.

B. A punitive bad conduct discharge may be adjudged for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article [e.g., 86, unauthorized absence for a period more than 30 days] upon conviction by a Special or General Court-Martial, in accordance with the Manual for Courts-Martial].

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00767

    Original file (ND03-00767.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00767 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030326. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to entry level separation or uncharacterized. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00500

    Original file (ND00-00500.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00500 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000314, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. I just wanted to be able to pursue my dream of becoming a police officer and to help society in helping keep law and order and peace in our country. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Naval Council of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00659

    Original file (ND04-00659.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00659 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040311. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reentry code changed so that he may reenlist. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01498

    Original file (ND03-01498.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-01498 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030917. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Houston County Sheriff’s record check Macon County Sheriff’s record check 54 pages from Applicant’s service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01169

    Original file (ND99-01169.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. No indication of appeal in the record.941122: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). The Board found that the applicant’s age, education level, and test scores qualified him for enlistment.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00397

    Original file (ND03-00397.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00397 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030107. The Applicant requests that the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00483

    Original file (ND00-00483.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00483 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000306, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to General/under Honorable conditions. I turned myself in to take my punishment and make things right. After a review of the applicant’s service record and other evidence presented to the NDRB, in conjunction with cnsideration of the factors listed in paragraph 9.3 of the Manual for Discharge Review, it was determined that relief...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00867

    Original file (ND01-00867.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Thank you for your time and consideration, Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 960723 - 961209 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 961210 Date of Discharge: 970807 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 00 07 28 Inactive:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00461

    Original file (ND04-00461.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00461 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040130. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Evidence of a positive employment record, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities, are examples of verifiable documents that should be provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00744

    Original file (ND02-00744.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.940525: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630650.Separation package missing from service record. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, is the result of his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls short of that required for an upgrade of...