Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00907
Original file (ND03-00907.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-SR, USN
Docket No. ND03-00907

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030424. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a personal appearance hearing before the board in the Washington National Capital Region. The Applicant listed the American Legion as the representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A personal appearance discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040421. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – commission of a serious offense, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.







PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Issues submitted by Applicant’s counsel/representative (AMERICAN LEGION) superseded the Applicant’s stated issues:

1. “ (Propriety Issue) This former member opines that his command failed to properly follow OPNAVINST 5350.4B which invalidated the findings that he possessed marijuana as well as his subsequent NJP, ADB and UOTHC discharge.

2. (Equity Issue) This former member further requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this application.”

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214
Twenty-five pages from Applicant’s service record
Two pages from Navy Military Personal Manual
Character Witness Statement
Letter from Applicant
Medical Administrative Assistant Transcript

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     890915 - 891030  COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 891101               Date of Discharge: 911009

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 11 09
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 69

 Highest Rate: SA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2.90 (2)    Behavior: 2.30 (2)                OTA : 2.90

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: BER, NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – commission of a serious offense, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

891128:  Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Marijuana abuse. Service directed urinalysis. Commanding Officer recommended retention. Comments: Mbr is an accession level recruit. Has potential for future naval service. Positive entry level urinalysis for THC, NAVDRUGLAB San Diego Msg No. 162028Z NOV 89. Mbr issued page 13. Will undergo mandatory urinalysis once a month during pre-accession trng IAW OPNAVINST 5350.4A.

910515:  Medical evaluation for drug abuse found no history of EOTH of drug abuse. Recommended NADSAP due to stress of reported legal problems of NJP

910522:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 91: Disobeying lawful order from Petty Officer on 910210, violation of UCMJ, Article 107: Make false official statement to San Diego Shore Patrol on 910410, violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Wrongfully possess marijuana on 910210.
         Award: Forfeiture of $376 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to SR, oral admonition. No indication of appeal in the record.
910531:  Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Marijuana abuse, shipboard, abuse denied. Physician found Applicant not dependent and recommended Level I treatment. Commanding Officer recommended separation. Comments: CO determined mbr to possess ZERO potential for further service and to be not alcohol/drug DEPENDENT req’d no education/tx M/O screening (D_) 15MAY91: denies drug usage, not alcohol/drug dependent, NADSAP would be beneficial to mbr for stress of recent proceedings this rpt not IAW time restraints due due to avoiding redundant paperwork (Drug Abuse Advisory 3/89) and waiting for evals/discipline to be completed (OPNAVINST 5350.4B encl 12 para 1): 10FEB91 incident, 10APR91 additional chrgs, 19APR91 additional chrgs, 15MAY91 NJP resched due to non-availability of witness, 15MAY91 M/O screening, 22MAY91 NJP.

910708:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to drug abuse, both as evidenced by your CO’s NJP on 22 May 1991.
910712:  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.
910819:  An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by an unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed a serious offense, and by a vote of 2 to 1 found that the Applicant had committed drug abuse, and by an unanimous vote that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.

910930:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to drug abuse. Commanding Officer’s comments (verbatim): Seaman Recruit F_ (Applicant) was charged with possession of marijuana on board USS DIXON (AS 37). A First Class Petty Officer who saw SR F_ (Applicant) in possession of a marijuana cigarette was quite certain of what she saw. Although the marijuana cigarette was never found, the prior commanding officer authorized a probable cause search of SR F_ (Applicant) locker. SR F_ (Applicant) had small baggies, one of which contained vegetable matter, in his locker. The matter tested positive for marijuana using a field reagent test kit. The entire amount of vegetable matter was used for the rest. During SR F_ (Applicant's) NJP hearing, he changed his story several times about what was in his hand. Captain B_ determined at the NJP hearing that SR F_ (Applicant) had possessed marijuana, based on all the evidence he evaluated.
 Counsel for the Respondent mentioned requirements for field tests to be confirmed by DOD laboratories in his letter of deficiency. The references he stated apply to urinalysis, not reagent kits used to identify substances. Counsel for the Respondent states that a negative urinalysis on the day the vegetable matter was seized is further evidence that no misconduct took place. The Respondent was charged with possession, not use, of marijuana, so a negative urinalysis would not address possession of marijuana.
In addition to the marijuana offense, SR F_ (Applicant) willfully disobeyed a petty officer when she told him to go with her to the Master-at-Arms office. SR F_ (Applicant) admitted that he made a false official statement to law enforcement officials. This blatant disregard for authority is unacceptable and detracts from good order and discipline. After a full and fair hearing, the Administrative Board found that he had committed the charged misconduct and drug abuse and recommended that he be separated with an Other than Honorable discharge. I concur with the findings arid most strongly recommend an expeditious Other than Honorable discharge.
911004:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

950113:  NDRB documentary record review Docket Number ND94-00748 conducted. Determination: discharge proper and equitable; relief not warranted.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19911009 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1. The Applicant states that his command failed to properly follow OPNAVINST 5350.4B. The Applicant believes that this alleged failure invalidates the findings that he possessed marijuana as well as his subsequent Non-judicial Punishment, Administrative Discharge Board and Other Than Honorable discharge. To permit relief, an error or inequity must be found to have existed during the period of enlistment under review. The Applicant did not provide any documentation, to indicate there existed an error of fact, law, procedure, violation of regulation at the time of discharge. Relief denied.

Issue 2. There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. After a complete review of the entire record, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined that his discharge was appropriate and that his evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate the conduct for which he was discharged. Relief denied.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), effective 15 Aug 91 until
04 Mar 93, Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE RM 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00916

    Original file (ND00-00916.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00916 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000718, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to Honorable or General/under Honorable conditions. (Equity Issue) As evidenced by his supporting documentation, this former member opines that his post-service conduct has been sufficiently creditable to warrant the Board’s clemency relief as authorized under provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174.C, enclosure (1), paragraph 9.3. No...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00851

    Original file (ND02-00851.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.920228: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure as evidenced by failure to successfully complete Level III Rehabilitation Aftercare treatment; misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense as evidenced by violation UCMJ Article 134, Drunk and disorderly conduct and violation UCMJ Article 86, Unauthorized absence; and misconduct due to drug...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00333

    Original file (ND01-00333.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00333 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 012501, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to General/under Honorable conditions and the reason for the discharge be changed to "early out". Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 890925: Applicant briefed on Navy's policy on drug and alcohol abuse.89XX06: Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Marijuana abuse, less than monthly, ashore off duty. Recommendation:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01334

    Original file (ND03-01334.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. No indication of appeal in the record.980115: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.980115: Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board. ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00933

    Original file (ND00-00933.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    910904: NAVDRUGLAB, Oakland, CA reported applicant' urine sample received 910826 tested positive for THC.910911: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by your service record in your current enlistment.910911: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00304

    Original file (ND99-00304.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00304 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 981222, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :970111: Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Marijuana abuse, unit sweep, less than monthly ashore off duty. Chief of Naval Operations Instruction (OPNAVINST 5350.4B) of 13 Sep 99 entitled Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control PART IV -...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00571-00

    Original file (00571-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    refrigerator first, the other individual who was unable to provide a full sample placed the bottle in the refrigerator after him. stated that you had not used LSD. map" for the commanding officer's use in deciding However, the February 1992 issuance of Navy When it was issued with OPNAVINST The Board concluded that since the CO did not have (NA.VADMIN) "road the appendix was clearly designed to The Board believed that the urinalysis was conducted in accordance with regulations and was...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00871

    Original file (ND99-00871.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Member signed page 13 accepting Level III treatment for drug abuse. Service member will be administratively separated after completion of Level III treatment for both alcohol and drugs. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In response to applicant’s issue 1, the applicant implies that a permissive doctrine exists whereby one in the military is allowed...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00965

    Original file (ND01-00965.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00965 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010723, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. At this time I needed a treatment program for alcohol abuse. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls10.jag.af.mil ".The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01321

    Original file (ND02-01321.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Character reference, dated August 9, 2002 Character reference, dated August 7, 2002 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 940921 - 950717 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 950718 Date of Discharge: 970713 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active:...