Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00717
Original file (ND03-00717.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-ACAA, USN
Docket No. ND03-00717

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030319. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant listed County of San Diego, Veteran Affairs as the representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040212. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910 - 142 (formerly 3630605).

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

 1. “To Whom It May Concern:

 My name is D_ A_ C_ ( Applicant ) and I am a disabled veteran of the U.S. Armed Forces. I am writing the review board because of the general discharge I received on December 6, 1999. I received this discharge because of my inability to conform with traditional military standards, but there were also personal hardships that contributed to my unwarranted performance.
I wanted to join the military because I thought it would be a excellent experience for me because I did not have a definite career objective. Eight months before leaving for boot camp, I experienced the death of my little brother, and that effected my life more than words can say. I believe it also affected the way I communicated with my superiors, especially when I was stationed on the USS John C. Stennis.
Life on the ship, for E-3 and below is difficult, especially when you are on your first six month cruise of the gulf. There were many times my supervisors took their frustrations out on me, and the trickle down effect became a nightmare. With few friends and even less people to relate to, I became a volatile bottle of frustration ready to explode. Many of the situations I found myself getting into, including confrontations with supervisors, was a direct result of the stressful environment we all were in, and my immaturity as a young man in the military.
I had a long time to think about my life after the military. I went to my home to North Carolina, and quickly went to the workforce. There were some opportunities that I could not capitalize on because of my general discharge. I decided that the best way for me to reach the level of success I hoped for, was to go off to college, so I saved money and moved to California where I began to attend MiraCosta College.
It has been almost four years since I have been out the military, and a lot of my views have changed for the better. In college, it was the military, which helped me get into the program provided by the V.A. called Vocational Rehabilitation. This program has been such a blessing because it has enabled me to be successful in college, and graduate from MiraCosta College in May 2003. I still can receive essential benefits like V.A. healthcare, and the V.A. home loan. The V.A. has been priceless in their efforts to advance my education by buying me a computer for my classes in web design.
I can honestly say, now, that if it was not for the military, I don’t know where I would be. It would be an honor for me to have the discharge overturned to honorable because the military has done so much for my life. I have hopes of continuing my education, and programs like the GI bill would be essential in helping me achieve my aspirations. I have matured greatly since my years as a sailor, and I plead that you don’t hold my past against me, and allow me a chance to achieve the success I dream of. I sincerely appreciate all the help the military has given me, and look forward to your continual help on my quest to become a great leader.
Thank You
 D_ A_ C_”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Letter of acknowledgement, dated April 18, 2002
Character reference, undated
Letter of recommendation, dated February 13, 2003
Unofficial Credit Transcript, Transcript Results, dated February 11, 2003 (3 pages)
Applicant’s DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     970125 - 970225  COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 970226               Date of Discharge: 991205

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 09 10
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 41/52

 Highest Rate: AC3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2.00 (3)    Behavior: 1.67 (3)                OTA: 2.22

 Military Decorations: None
Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SSDR, AFEM, NUC, NER

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-142 (formerly 3630605).

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

970226:  You are being retained in the Naval service, despite your fraudulent induction as evidenced by your failure to disclose required basic enlistment eligibility information. This decision is based on the information you provided the Recruit Quality Assurance Interviewer and if it is found that additional information has not been disclosed, this waiver is void and you could be subject to other judicial or administrative proceedings. Marijuana 4X 11/96-1/97. A program waiver for marijuana usage has been granted on 970227 for enlistment in AC program.

990408:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Leaving appointed place of duty on 990321, to wit: USS JOHN C. STENNIS (CVN 74).
         Award: Restriction and extra duty for 15 days, reduction to ACAA. No indication of appeal in the record.
990412:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Leaving you appointed place of duty.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.
        
990525:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from appointed place of duty for 59 minutes, violation of UCMJ Article 92: Disobey a written order by sleeping in a rack/berthing to which not assigned.
         Award: Revoke previously suspended reduction in rate (Frocked E-4 reduced to E-3 (ACAN), restriction and extra duty for 30 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
991121:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Failure to obey a lawful order.
         Award: Restriction and extra duty for 30 days, reduction to ACAA. No indication of appeal in the record.
991203:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.
991203:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.
000126:  Commanding Officer directed general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19991205 general (under honorable conditions) for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1. The Applicant’s service record was marred by award of three non-judicial punishments for leaving appointed place of duty, and failure to obey a lawful order. An upgrade of the Applicant's discharge to an honorable characterization is not warranted. Relief denied. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of educational opportunities as requested in the issue. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge. Relief denied.

The following is provided for the edification of the Applicant. There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded, based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving naval service. The NDRB is authorized, however, to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective
12 Dec 97 until 29 March 2000, Article 1910-142 [formerly 3630605]. SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT- COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE .




B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00256

    Original file (ND03-00256.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00256 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20021126, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Unauthorized absence over 30 consecutive days is a serious offense. E. In Appendix 12 of the Manual for Courts-Martial, a punitive discharge is authorized for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 86 (unauthorized absence for a period in excess of 30 days), and Article...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01245

    Original file (ND03-01245.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-01245 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030718. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Issue 1: The Applicant contend “what I was charged for, in the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00118

    Original file (ND01-00118.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00118 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001101, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to: Naval...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00697

    Original file (ND03-00697.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to the applicant’s discharge at that time. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01283

    Original file (ND03-01283.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-01283 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030724. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Due to his inability to meet the minimal standards for continued Naval Service, and alcohol rehabilitation failure, AA W_ (Applicant) is processed for separation.030221: Applicant discharged with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) by reason of misconduct due to commission of a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00005

    Original file (ND02-00005.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00005 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010926, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Board reviewed the applicant’s service record and, although the discharge package is missing, noted the applicant had at least three NJP’s in his enlistment in addition to drug abuse. Heis reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00253

    Original file (ND04-00253.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. _______________________________________________________________________ In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166, and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in supplement to this Applicant’s petition.The service record is incomplete. No...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00382

    Original file (ND02-00382.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00382 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020213, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions and the reason for the discharge be changed to sexual harassment. My commanding officer also recommended a General Discharge based on my years of outstanding service. The one character reference provided by the Applicant does not mitigate his conduct, and therefore an upgrade based upon...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00049

    Original file (ND04-00049.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 970331 - 970721 COG Active: USN None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 970722 Date of Discharge: 000629 Length...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01124

    Original file (ND02-01124.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-SA, USN Docket No. ND02-01124 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020806, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, and documentation of community service are examples of verifiable documents that may be provided to receive consideration for relief...