Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00686
Original file (ND03-00686.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PNSN, USN
Docket No. ND03-00686

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030313. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.
In the acknowledgement letter the applicant was informed that he was approaching the 15 year point for review by this Board and was encouraged to attend a personal appearance hearing in the Washington, D.C. area. No respond was received.

 Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040128. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Homosexuality - engaged in, attempted to engage in, or solicited another to engage in a homosexual act or acts, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630400.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated
Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:
1. “I appreciate the opportunity to finally explain my side of the story. The police officer that appeared at captain mask gave incorrect information. He stated I was performing a lewd act, which was totally untrue. But unfortunately the captain believed the officer. We was parked in a well lit parking lot, the passenger was relieving himself, out the passenger door. When the officer realized we were in the military he called his station. Shore patrol picked us up. We didn’t know what we were being charged with until later. When I was approached by fellow sailors. Information that was release to the person on watch that night. There was no record of this incident logged in the civilian court system. I was a victim of un-just causes. Please see my personnel records, as it will reflect my professionalism and dedication to the military. Please consider my request for an up-grade of my discharge. For I'm only guilty of being in the wrong place at the wrong time.”

Applicant stated on the application that he has submitted additional issues. None were found.
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     861003 - 861023  COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 861024               Date of Discharge: 890828

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 10 05
         Inactive: 00 00 00

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 43

 Highest Rate: PN3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.40 (3)    Behavior: 2.93 (3)                OTA: 3.33

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SSDR

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):
UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Homosexuality - engaged in, attempted to engage in, or solicited another to engage in a homosexual act or acts, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630400.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

890718:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 125: commit sodomy with another service member.
         Award: Forfeiture of $150.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 15 days, reduction to E-3. No indication in the record of appeal.

890721:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of homosexuality as evidenced by engaging in, attempting to engage in homosexual acts. Applicant advised, that if separation is approved, the characterization of his service may be under other than honorable conditions.
890721:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
890730:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of homosexuality as evidenced by his engaging in, attempting to engage in homosexual acts. Commanding Officer’s comments: “Petty Officer L_ was an excellent performer while assigned to the USS New Jersey… Although L_ and M_ denied the allegations, I credited the testimony of a Long Beach Marine Patrol Officer who told me at the NJP…that at 0113, on 21 May 1989, he observed L_ and M_ engaged in homosexual acts in L_’s car, which was parked in the shoreline drive area of Long Beach. The shoreline drive area is about one mile of open public (city) parkland… The car was parked in a location which is closed after midnight. The area was well-lighted and the officer testified that very few people were around the area.”

890803:  CNMPC directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of homosexual conduct.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19890828 under other than honorable conditions by reason of homosexual conduct (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1. In accordance with regulations a discharge under other than honorable conditions was warranted in this case because the Applicant’s homosexual act was committed “openly in public view.” The Applicant’s statements to the Board do not refute the presumption of regularity in this case. That no civilian charges resulted from this incident is not a basis for relief. While he may feel that he was the victim of “un-just causes,” the evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. The Board considered applicant’s record of service but determined that it did not mitigate the misconduct for which he was separated. Relief denied.
The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), 15 June 1987 until
14 Aug 91, Article 3630400, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF HOMOSEXUALITY.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00181

    Original file (ND99-00181.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Homosexuality - engaged in, attempted to engage in, or solicited another to engage in a homosexual act or acts, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630400.The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 (3 copies) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00163

    Original file (ND03-00163.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Please review my service record. 930310: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed homosexual acts and that such acts warranted separation, and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general). 930324: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general) by reason of misconduct due to commission of a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00843

    Original file (ND00-00843.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-FR, USN Docket No. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In response to the applicant’s issue, the Board found that the applicant admitted to performing homosexual acts on more than one occasion and also admitted being the individual who initiated the act. ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01007

    Original file (ND99-01007.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    851002: CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge as under Honorable conditions (General) by reason of homosexuality. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 851009 under Honorable conditions (General) for homosexuality (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant introduced...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00391

    Original file (ND04-00391.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s submitted a statement indicating, “I feel the mast itself was done fairly and I was given ample opportunity to speak on my own behalf.” Further, the Applicant waived his right to request an Administrative Board to contest his separation. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00142

    Original file (ND04-00142.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “Please review my records to see if my discharge can be upgraded to honorable. In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166, and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in supplement to the Applicant’s petition. 900209: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00023

    Original file (ND99-00023.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    950508: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed homosexual acts and that such acts warranted separation, and recommended discharge General (under Honorable conditions). PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 950807 with a General (under Honorable conditions) by reason of homosexuality – stated he is a homosexual (A). You...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00895

    Original file (ND00-00895.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    970710: BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge with characterization as type warranted by service record by reason of homosexual conduct. b. Homosexual conduct is grounds for separation from the naval service. However, upon receipt of credible information of homosexual conduct (as defined in subparagraph 2d), commanders or appointed inquiry officials may ask members if they engaged in such conduct.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00268

    Original file (ND02-00268.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 840712 - 850709 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 850710 Date of Discharge: 881116 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 04...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00561

    Original file (ND99-00561.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    870714: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for by reason of commission of a serious offense as evidenced by violation of UCMJ, Article 125 (Sodomy) and homosexuality as evidenced by his statement that he engaged in homosexual acts. 870816: CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge with characterization of other than honorable by reason of homosexual conduct. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found...