Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00685
Original file (ND03-00685.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-SMSN, USN
Docket No. ND03-00685

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 20030313, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a personal appearance hearing discharge review before a traveling panel. The applicant listed American Legion as the representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter to the Applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel, all hearing are held in the Washington National Capital Region.

Decision

A personal appearance hearing was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20030925. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character and the narrative reason for the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

1. (Equity Issue) This former member requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this application.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Reference Letter from Pastor C_ M_
2 Copies of Discharge Summary from Memphis Alcohol & Drug Council, INC, IOP Program (2 pages)
2 Copies of Certificate of Completion from Memphis Alcohol & Drug Council (Aftercare) dated December 12, 2002
Certificate of Recognition from Memphis City Council (Outstanding Contribution to the Community)
Letter from C_ G_, Executive Director Memphis Alcohol & Drug Council, INC to R_ S_, Representative American Legion dated February 12, 2003.
Greater Johnson Baptist Church business card.
Character References (13 letters)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     880514 - 880601  COG
         Active: None             

Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 880602               Date of Discharge: 900124

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 07 23
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 34                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 16                        AFQT: 42

 Highest Rate: SH3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2.87 (3)    Behavior: 2.40 (4)                OTA: 2.60

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SSDR

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

880604:  Applicant briefed on Navy's policy on drug and alcohol abuse.

 891221:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Wrongful use of cocaine on 891207.
         Award: Forfeiture of $407.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to SHSN. No indication of appeal in the record.
891227:  Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant to be a drug abuser, not drug dependent.
891227:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by wrongful use of cocaine on 891207.
891227:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.
891227:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). Commanding Officer’s comments (verbatim): [This command has reaffirmed and publicly adopted the CNO's Zero Tolerance Drug Abuse Policy. The presence of this mbr (Applicant) in an operational environment seriously impairs combat readiness, security, efficiency and morale.]

900104:  Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Cocaine abuse, abuse denied. Random urinalysis 891219. DAPA and physician found Applicant not dependent and recommended separation. Comments: SHSN (Applicant) shows no potential for further useful service due to substance abuse.
         Note: Date of report corrected to 900104 from 890104.

901227:  CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).
021115:  NDRB documentary record review Docket Number ND02-00494 conducted. Determination: discharge proper and equitable; relief not warranted.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 900124 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1: T here is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, a drug-free lifestyle, and certification of community service and non-involvement with civil authorities are examples of verifiable proof that can be submitted. The Board appreciates the Applicant’s efforts to improve his life and his involvement in his church and encourages him to continue his participation. However, the Applicant did not provide sufficient verifiable documentation of good character and conduct to mitigate his illegal drug use while on active duty. Relief is not warranted.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), Change 6, effective 11 Jan 89 until 13 Jun 90, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00494

    Original file (ND02-00494.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    891227: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by wrongful use of cocaine on 7 December 1989.891227: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.891227: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00385

    Original file (ND03-00385.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s legal guardian requests the characterization of service received at the time of Applicant’s discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. No indication of appeal in the record.870924: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by wrongful use or possession of a controlled substance.870930: Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00686

    Original file (ND00-00686.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00686 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000504, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 930922 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00243

    Original file (ND04-00243.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I love my country and would gladly serve again if I could. I strongly recommend that he be discharged from the Navy and that the characterization of his discharge be other than honorable.900105: CNMPC directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00635

    Original file (ND02-00635.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00635 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020404, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. (f) (1).As the representative, we ask that consideration be given to equitable relief, as this is a matter that involves a determination whether a discharge should be changed under the equity standards, to include any issue upon which the Applicant submits to the Board’s discretionary...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00133

    Original file (ND01-00133.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MAY SUBMIT ISSUES AT TIME OF HEARING. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Authorization FormCharacter reference letter from “Unity of Faith Worship Center, dated march 19.2001 Character reference letter from OIC business Services, dated May 14, 2001. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00761

    Original file (ND01-00761.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 890419 - 890420 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 890421 Date of Discharge: 891120 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 00 07 00 Inactive: None The Board found no impropriety in...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00788

    Original file (ND01-00788.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I mainly just work and provide for my family. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 DAV letter, 020220 Letters from applicant, 020323 and 010416 Character reference letters (x6) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 900104 - 900117 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00258

    Original file (ND00-00258.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board determined this issue is without merit. The applicant claims he realizes he made a mistake, he was not offered a drug program and he was told he could get his discharge changed to General, under Honorable conditions. The NDRB reviews the propriety (did the Navy follow its own...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00898

    Original file (ND02-00898.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 880309: Ordered to active duty for 36 months under the Active Mariner program. 880921: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use) and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense.881007: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 2210 880920 to 0400, 880921, violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Did on or about 880920, fail to obey a...