Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00684
Original file (ND03-00684.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-SA, USN
Docket No. ND03-00684

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030310. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040311. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630650.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated
Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “To whom it may concern:
I J___ W__ H___ would like to be able to take a moment to explain the issues that led to my discharge from the Navy. I was in Tech Core when I received a phone call from my mother expressing her health problems and financial problems. So I took on a second job outside the navy trying to help with some of her financial problems. In so doing this I began missing classes at NTC Great Lake. I missed 18-24 days before I returned to my Commanding Officer. I explained the situation to him, he said I should talk to the Chaplain. So I went to talk to the Chaplain and explained the situation to him. I was asked if I had any brothers of sisters I told him that I had a brother and a sister. He asked why they couldn’t help and I explained that my brother was in prison, and my sister had her own family problems to deal with. He told me that he didn’t feel it was important and that I didn’t need the leave time. So I acted off impulse and wrote down the address and phone number to my mother home. I told them that if they needed me that this is where they could reach me. I had no intentions of being a Deserter, or I would not have given them the address and phone number to where I was going. I know that I handled the situation wrong. I was a 20 year old whose mother needed health and financial assistance. I was new to the service and didn’t know what options I had. I am now 26 and have grown to be more dependable and responsible. I am willing to do Reserve time to show my willingness, and dependability. I just ask you give me a 2 nd chance. I will not let you down.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, NO DISCHARGE PACKAGE AVAILABLE, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
Letter of Intent
Character Reference Letter from Calif. Dept Of Forestry and Fire Protection
Character Reference Letter from Calif. Dept Of Forestry and Fire Protection dated November 1, 2002
Character Reference Letter from Faith Baptist Church
Character Reference Letter from G_ R_ (Modoc Mini Mart)
Character Reference Letter from Alturas Rural Fire Dept
Training Certificate (CDF Firefighter I Basic/Haz-Mat First Responder Operational)
Training Certificate (Confined Space Awareness)
Training Certificate (Company Drill-Live Fire/Structure Behavior/Vehicle Fires)
Training Certificate (Forklift Operator)
Training Certificate (Front End Loader and 2-Axle Dump Truck)
Training Certificate (Basic Store Management)
Training Certificate (Firefighter Safety and Survival/I-100 Introduction to Ics)
Training Certificate (Fire Command 1B)
Training Certificate (Incident Dispatcher)
Training Certificate (Fire Investigation IA)
Training Certificate (Fire Instructor 1A)
Training Certificate (Fire Instructor 1B)
Training Certificate (Fire Command 1A)
Training Certificate (Fire Command 1B)
Training Certificate (Low Angle Rescue)
Training Certificate (CFC-12 Refrigerant Recycling)
Training Certificates (Firefighter I Advanced Training/S-217 Interagency Helicopter Training)
Training Certificate (Communicable Disease Prevention)
Training Certificate (Public Safety CPR)
Training Certificate (Trauma and Medical Patient Assessment)
Training Cards: (EMT 1/Public Safety CPR/Defensive Driver Training)
Letter of Recommendation: (EMT 1 Ride along on Ambulance)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     970305 - 970318  COG
         Active: USN                        None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 970319               Date of Discharge: 971007

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 05 17
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 20                          Years Contracted: 4 (24 months extension)

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 67

 Highest Rate: SA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NOB*                 Behavior: NOB             OTA: NOB

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: M-16A1(C) Sharpshooter

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 34

* None Obtained
Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630650.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

970731:  To UA.

970828:  Report of Declaration of Deserter (NAVPERS 1600-3). Applicant declared a deserter on 970828 having been an unauthorized absentee since 0730, 970827 from SSC, Great Lakes, IL.

970910:  Report of Return of Deserter. Applicant apprehended by civil authorities on 970904 (1145) at Alturas CA. Returned to military control 970904 (1145).
NO DISCHARGE PACKAGE AVAILABLE

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19971007 under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issue 1: Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the Applicant’s enlistment. While he may feel that his family was a contributing factor, it does not mitigate the Applicant’s disobedience of the orders and directives that regulate good order and discipline in the naval service, demonstrating he was unsuitable for further service. His service record is marred by unauthorized absence and desertion resulting in a discharge in lieu of Court-Martial proceedings, thus substantiating the misconduct . Relief denied.

There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing opportunities as requested, by the Applicant. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge. In the Applicant’s case, the Board could discern no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s discharge. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to the applicant’s discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 14, effective
03 Oct 96 until 11 Dec 97, Article 3630650, PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING ENLISTED PERSONNEL FOR SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURTMARTIAL.

B. A punitive bad conduct discharge may be adjudged for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 86, unauthorized absence for a period more than 30 days upon conviction by a Special or General Court-Martial, in accordance with the Manual for Courts-Martial.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


.

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00342

    Original file (ND99-00342.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00342 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990111, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. There was nothing in the records, nor did the applicant provide any documentation, to indicate there existed an error of fact, law, procedure, or discretion at the time of discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500652

    Original file (ND0500652.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND05-00652 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050302. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant’s service was marred by civilian convictions for a concealed weapon, and failure to appear and the military offenses of missing ship’s movement and unauthorized absence.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01075

    Original file (ND99-01075.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. No indication of appeal in the record.891007: Vacate suspended reduction to SA awarded at CO's NJP of 30Aug89 due to continued misconduct.891007: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 91: Disrespectful in language to a superior petty officer, violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Disobeying a lawful order from a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00489

    Original file (ND02-00489.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00489 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020305, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. 920430: Charges preferred to special court-martial for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 86: Did on or about 910919, without authority, absent himself from his unit, to wit: USS INDEPENDENCE located at Yokosuka, Japan, and did remain so absent until apprehended on or about 920309 (142...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00397

    Original file (ND03-00397.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00397 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030107. The Applicant requests that the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00585

    Original file (ND04-00585.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). When I wasn’t making enough in the military and my family was on the verge of being put out on the street, I didn’t know what to do. I married my girlfriend, worked full time, and saved enough money so my family could live while I was gone.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01209

    Original file (MD04-01209.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-01209 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040723. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00326

    Original file (ND01-00326.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Letter from applicant's father dated January 17, 2001 Letter to applicant's father from Commanding Officer dated July 22, 1997 Letter from applicant's father to Commanding Officer dated July 2, 1997 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 970130 -...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00863

    Original file (ND99-00863.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-SMSN, USN Docket No. ND99-00863 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990611, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Relief to a fully Honorable discharge is, however, not warranted.The applicant’s second issue states: “I have been very involved in the Children’s Ministry at my Church and in Latino Affairs at the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00950

    Original file (ND04-00950.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00950 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040526. Thank you for reviewing and considering my application The Applicant’s evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate his misconduct sufficient to warrant an upgrade to his discharge.