Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00665
Original file (ND03-00665.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-ETSN, USN
Docket No. ND03-00665

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030305. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040205. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“1. I believe my discharge was improper because I served four years with good conduct and had one incident destroy my navel career. While onboard USS PENNSYLVANIA SSBN 735 I learned my brother committed suicide and had extremely hard times dealing with this issue. I still completed three tours. I was qualified submarine’s but still had problems. I made a mistake and fully accepted the fact. I have gone into treatment to treat this illness. I am doing well and attending college to get on the right track

References
1. G___ R___ OSC Orange County Drug Court #”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copy of Certificate of Completion (Adult Drug Court Program) dated December 6, 2002
Copy of Certificate of Achievement (Completion of Day Treatment Program) dated September 20, 2002
Copy of DD Form 214
Copy of DD Form 215

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     900627 - 901031  COG
         Active: USN                        None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 901101               Date of Discharge: 950731

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 04 09 00
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4 (24 months extension)

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 75

 Highest Rate: ET3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.80 (5)    Behavior: 3.88 (5)                OTA: 3 .72

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: GCM, NDSM, SSBN Deterrent Patrol Pine w/1s* & 2 g*

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

950421:  NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 950407, tested positive for [THC].

950424:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by all drug incidents in your current enlistment.
950424:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
950519:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

950623:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19950731 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1: The Applicant’s issues are without merit. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the Applicant’s enlistment. While he may feel that his family problems were contributing factors, they do not mitigate the Applicant’s disobedience of the orders and directives that regulate good order and discipline in the naval service, demonstrating he was unsuitable for further service. His service record is marred by illegal drug use . Mandatory processing for separation is required for sailors who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. Relief denied.

There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, a drug-free lifestyle, and certification of community service and non-involvement with civil authorities are examples of verifiable proof that can be submitted. At this time, the Board determined that the documentation submitted by the Applicant does not mitigate his misconduct while on active duty. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.






Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9/94, effective
22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00820

    Original file (ND04-00820.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00820 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040421. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s request for hardship discharge with cover sheet, unsigned HT2 request for hardship Applicant’s résumé PART II -...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00609

    Original file (ND02-00609.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-EM3, USN Docket No. ND02-00609 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020404, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions or entry level separation or uncharacterized. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00061

    Original file (ND00-00061.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In response to applicant’s issue 1, the Board has no control over re-enlistment bonuses or the applicant’s credit rating. In response to applicant’s issue 2, the Board found that an Honorable discharge after 36 months on active duty is required for entitlements to benefits under the G.I. At this time, the applicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00375

    Original file (ND01-00375.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00375 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010206, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Letter from applicant PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN None Inactive:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00192

    Original file (ND01-00192.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I strongly recommend that he be separated from the naval service and his service be characterized as Other Than Honorable. Enclosures (1) through (5) provide supporting documentation for Petty Officer (applicant's) administrative separation.970924: Commander, Submarine Group 9 directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01011

    Original file (ND01-01011.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-ICFN, USN Docket No. Accordingly, only the service and medical records were reviewed by the Board. No indication of appeal in the record.880610: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense as evidenced by a positive random urinalysis test for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00212

    Original file (ND04-00212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 5/93, effective 05 Mar 93 until 21 Jul 94, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.B.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01116

    Original file (ND01-01116.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    890120: COMSUBGRU 6 recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Issue 1 states: “(Equity Issue) His single violation of the UCMJ notwithstanding, this former member opines that his overall service record warrants discharge under honorable conditions.”...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00249

    Original file (ND04-00249.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to entry-level separation. It has been a little over two years since I have been out the navy. 010809: Commander, Submarine Group 9 directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00983

    Original file (ND99-00983.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    970717: Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant not to be drug dependent so drug abuse treatment is not indicated. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 970801 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C...