Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01011
Original file (ND01-01011.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-ICFN, USN
Docket No. ND01-01011

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010731, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020307. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues (verbatim)

 1. During my last year in the Navy I was under a lot of stress. Now I have turned my life around, my kids are happy, and so am I. Will you please change my discharge to Honorable because for one thing I want my kids to know my military career was Honorable. I was a very good sailor when I was in the Navy.

Primary Specialty & Number Title:
IC-4731 Auxiliary Electrician 4 yrs
9593 Submarine Repairman 3 yrs

Decorations, Medals, Badges:
Battle Efficiency Ribbon; Letter of Commendation (Gold Wreath Award (2)) from Flag Officer, Good Conduct Award

Military Education:
INT AN SYS CMB MAINT - A6230051
GYRO MK19 CMB MA - A670-0012
IC PACKAGE FOR SSN/SSBN-A-623-0030
NAVY RECRUITER ORIENTATION UNIT

 Documentation
In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, it was suggested he provide post-service documentation for the Board to consider in the review. Applicant did not respond and did not provide any documentation. Accordingly, only the service and medical records were reviewed by the Board.

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USN                        830207 - 870203  HON
                  USNR             800306 - 830206  HON (To enlist USN)
         Inactive: USNR            800122 - 800305  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 870204               Date of Discharge: 880711

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 05 08
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 29                          Years Contracted: 6

 Education Level: 13                        AFQT: 36

 Highest Rate: IC2

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.47 (3)    Behavior: 3.47 (3)                OTA: 3.61

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Battle Efficiency Ribbon, LoC (Gold Wreath Award (2)) from Flag Officer, GCA

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

880323:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92 (4 Specs): failure to obey order or regulation (09FEB88, 19MAR88, 16FEB88, 01FEB88); violation of UCMJ, Article 107 (1 Spec): false official statement (15MAR88).
         Award: Restriction for 60 days, reduction to E-4. No indication of appeal in the record.
880421:  DARR: report as result random urinalysis, positive for cocaine. Evaluation by DAPA, not dependent as determined by physician, recommend separate from service not via VA hospital.
880503:  Medical evaluation by the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program (Dr. M. D_): Diagnosis - Cocaine Abuse episodic - pt related to using cocaine twice in March 1988. Found the applicant to be a drug abuser, not drug dependent.

880504:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: wrongful use a controlled substance; violation of UCMJ, Article 134: breaking restriction; violation of UCMJ, Article 92: failure to obey order or regulation.
Award: Forfeiture of $519 per month for 2 months, restriction for 60 days, reduction to E-3. No indication of appeal in the record.
880610:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense as evidenced by a positive random urinalysis test for cocaine and failure to obey order or regulation.
880610:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

880617:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use) and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. Commanding officer’s comments (verbatim): "ICFN (Applicant) no longer has regard for the orders and regulations of the United States Navy. Fully aware of the Navy's policy of zero tolerance with substance abuse, he willfully used a controlled substance. His actions continue to reflect total discredit to himself and the naval service. He is not recommendation for advancement or retention.

880628:  CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 880711 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1. The applicant states that in his “last year in the Navy I was under a lot of stress.” He states that he has turned his life around and wants the discharge changed to Honorable for his children. The applicant provided no documentation to support his statement that he was under a lot of stress in his last year of service or that he has turned his life around. There is no documentary evidence that show matters of mitigation and extenuation were not considered by the discharge authority at the time of discharge. Additionally, the Board will not upgrade an applicant’s discharge to allow him or her to be viewed more positively by others. The discharge was proper and equitable. Relief is not warranted.

The following is provided for the benefit of the applicant. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for clemency, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide any of these documents. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), effective 15 Jun 87 until
10 Jan 89, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls10.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00381

    Original file (ND00-00381.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) has no authority to change reenlistment codes (RE) or make recommendations to permit reentry in the Naval service or any other Armed Forces. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant’s first issue states: “Under current standards, I...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00258

    Original file (ND00-00258.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board determined this issue is without merit. The applicant claims he realizes he made a mistake, he was not offered a drug program and he was told he could get his discharge changed to General, under Honorable conditions. The NDRB reviews the propriety (did the Navy follow its own...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00009

    Original file (ND99-00009.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    891008: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).Commanding officer’s comments (verbatim): ICFN (applicant's) second drug abuse incident in May 1986 was extremely disappointing to the command and was believed at the time to be his first drug incident. ICFN (applicant) had again tested positive for cocaine. 861022: Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Cocaine abuse, 1 to 3 times per month, Nov83 to Sep86, ashore...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01152

    Original file (ND02-01152.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) None Active: USN None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 860927 Date of Discharge: 881024 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 11 21 Inactive: 00 01 06 880807: Commanding Officer recommended...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00916

    Original file (ND03-00916.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620. 880710: BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00324

    Original file (ND99-00324.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This investigation has been conducted under suspected violations of Article 112 (a) of the UCMJ, Narcotics.971218: Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Cocaine possession and abuse ashore, off duty, 971015, medical. Based on the findings of the Administrative Board and with the separation authority granted to me in reference (a), ICFN (applicant) is hereby discharged from the naval service with a characterization of General (Under Honorable Conditions). PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00008

    Original file (ND03-00008.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00008 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20020925, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable, general/under honorable conditions, uncharacterized or entry level separation. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :900328: Civil Conviction: Clay County Court for violation of worthless checks (four counts-capias).Sentence: Court withheld adjudication. At this time, the applicant has not provided...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00737

    Original file (ND01-00737.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00737 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010508, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to unfit for military duty. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls10.jag.af.mil ".The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00701

    Original file (ND99-00701.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel for the respondent intends to submit a letter of deficiencies concerning counsel's exhibit (N). This command has expended significant time and effort on this case and an Other Than Honorable Discharge is most certainly warranted.921113: BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01038

    Original file (ND00-01038.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant’s issue states: “I believe my discharge was inequitable because this was my only offense and I was a good member of the service.” The record shows the applicant was found guilty of use of a controlled substance. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 5/93, effective 05 Mar 93 until 21...