Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00409
Original file (ND03-00409.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT




ex-EMSN, USN
Docket No. ND03-00409

Applicant’s Request

The application for discharge review was received on 20030116. The Applicant requests that the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a personal appearance hearing discharge review before the Board in the Washington National Capital Region. The Applicant lists the Veterans of Foreign Wars as the representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.


Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20031215. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues, as stated

No issues were submitted by the Applicant.

Issues submitted by Applicant’s counsel/representative ( VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS):

“1. We concur with the Applicant contention that his discharge be graded. We refer this case to the Board for their careful and compassionate consideration and request the Applicant’s discharge be reviewed for upgrading his discharge to general.”

Documentation

In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:

None


PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):

         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     890727 - 890806  COG
         Active: USN                        890807 - 930805  HON

Period of Service Under Review :

Date of Enlistment: 930806               Date of Discharge: 940401

Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 07 26
         Inactive: None

Age at Entry: 23                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 29

Highest Rate: BM3

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

Performance: NMF*                 Behavior: NMF             OTA: NMF

Military Decorations: None

Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SSDR, OSR

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

*No Marks Found in the service record.

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

930806:  Reenlisted onboard USS FRANK CABLE (AS-40) for 4 years.

931015:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence, violation of UCMJ, Article 107: False official statement.

Award: Restriction and extra duty for 20 days, reduction to E-3 (suspended for 6 months). No indication of appeal in the record.

931019: 
Retention Warning from USS FRANK CABLE (AS-20): Advised of deficiency (You have received nonjudicial punishment. The offenses involved failure to go to appointed place of duty, which is in violation of Article 86 and false official statement, which is in violation of Article 107 of the UCMJ. If you continue to engage in misconduct, your service record may reflect a pattern of misconduct as described in MILPERMAN 3630600), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

940122:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Disobeying a lawful order to move hazmat to a specific area.
         Award: Forfeiture of $50.00 pay per month for 1 month. No indication of appeal in the record.

940127:  The suspended reduction in rate awarded at CO’s NJP on 931015 is hereby vacated.

940131:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 128: Assault with a deadly weapon, on or about 940126, violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Disorderly conduct, on or about 940126.

         Award: Forfeiture of $500.00 pay per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 45 days. Appealed 940204. Appeal denied 940215.

940131:  USS FRANK CABLE (AS-40) notified Applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of serious offense as evidenced by your nonjudicial punishment of 931015, 940122, and 940131 and by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by nonjudicial punishments of 931015, 940122 and 940131.

940131:  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.

940209:  Base driving privileges suspended for seven years.

940228:  An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.

940303:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. Applicant has a civilian hearing for illegal possession of a handgun. This matter was brought to the command’s attention after initiating administrative processing.

940322:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.



PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19940401 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1. A characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions is warranted when the member's conduct constitutes a significant departure from that expected of a sailor. The Applicant’s service was marred by award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on three occasions and an adverse counseling entry on another occasion. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his disobedience of the orders and directives which regulate good order and discipline in the naval service, and falls short of that required for an upgrade to his characterization of service. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.

The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country for the period of enlistment under review.
Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.












Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C, Change 5, effective 05 Mar 93 until 21 Jul 94), Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – A PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.



PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT


If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00493

    Original file (ND99-00493.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00493 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990224, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The offenses involve being drunk and disorderly, which is in violation of Article 134 of the UCMJ; This is a serious offense, and is an misconduct, your service record reflect a pattern of misconduct as described in MILPERSMAN 3630600), notified of corrective actions and assistance available,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01140

    Original file (ND99-01140.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Missed sailing of this vessel from Charleston, SC, 96FEB15960216: Report of Declaration of Desertion issued: Declared deserter 15FEB96 having been an unauthorized absentee since 0720, 15FEB96 from USS FRANK CABLE. Transferred to SUBREFIT site Guam on 96APR06 for further transfer to USS FRANK CABLE (AS-40).960429: Punishment of reduction in rate, 25 days restriction/extra duty and forfeiture of $465.00 for 2 months suspended at CO's NJP on 95OCT31 vacated this date due to continued...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00234

    Original file (ND03-00234.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was on restriction and told I was going to CCU, but at that point I really couldn’t and didn’t want to. 000316: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Did on or about 0705 hours, 000315, without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to her appointed place of duty to wit: Restricted Muster; violation of UCMJ, Article 92: (2 Specifications), Spec 1: Having knowledge of a lawful order issued by OM2 R_ Z_, to wit: To leave the Polarisville berthing trailer and stay within the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00500

    Original file (ND04-00500.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00500 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040204. We refer this case to the Board for their careful and compassionate consideration.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 911028 - 920908 COG Active: USN None Period of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00189

    Original file (ND99-00189.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 880621 - 910915 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 870811 - 880620 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 910916 Date of Discharge: 930708 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 09 23 Inactive: None Fined $248.00; or 30...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00909

    Original file (ND01-00909.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Four pages from applicant's service record Copy of employee evaluation dated December 9, 1999 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 900430 - 901021 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 901022...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00947

    Original file (ND99-00947.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 880721 - 890726 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 890727 Date of Discharge: 920110 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 05 14 Inactive: None The applicant’s first issue states: “I...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00770

    Original file (ND02-00770.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    For this reason this is why I'm asking for a review to my discharge upgraded from other honorable to Honorable so that I may obtain a V.A. No indication of appeal in the record.940122: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to civil conviction and misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense as evidenced by three findings of guilty in charges of worthless checks, (Duval County case numbers:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00094

    Original file (ND00-00094.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS but the reason should be corrected to say PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600).The NDRB noted an administrative error on the original DD Form 214. Applicant declared a deserter 98MAR13, having been an unauthorized absentee since 1130 98FEB10, from USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT (CVN 71).980616: Surrendered at Personnel Support Activity, MacDill AFB, Tampa, FL. The names, and votes of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00025

    Original file (ND00-00025.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.970804: DD Form 214: applicant discharged under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a Pattern of misconduct.Discharge package missing from service record. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. The NDRB reviews...