Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00307
Original file (ND03-00307.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-SA, USN
Docket No. ND03-00307

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20021211. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20031121. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB; however due to an administrative error, the Applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects characterization of service as “General (Under Honorable Conditions) instead of “Entry Level Separation” and appropriate action will be taken to correct the error. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall remain, as corrected: ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION/Fraudulent entry, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630100.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “I had become Discouraged in my service to the USN during a time in my life where I was experiencing Undue Hardship in my personal and family life. I held no resentment toward the USN – Rather I enjoyed my time in service, and learned much which I still incorporate in my daily life.

I am currently changing careers and would like to have either an Honorable or General – Honorable discharge reflected on my applications. I would appreciate any consideration you could show me regarding this matter.”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     911112 - 920630  COG
         Active: USN                        None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 920701               Date of Discharge: 921222

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 05 22
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 80

 Highest Rate: SA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
Performance: 3.6 (1)     Behavior: 3.6 (1)                 OTA : 3.6

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL)/Fraudulent entry, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630100. (Characterization of Service to be administratively corrected to read: ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION.)

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

911111:  DoD National Agency Questionnaire (DD Form 398-2): Applicant failed to disclose pre-service drug abuse.
921215:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry as evidenced by failure to reveal at the time of enlistment, a complete and accurate history of pre-service drug use. Applicant advised if separation approved, the least favorable characterization of service authorized is your case is General.
921215:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation. Applicant did not object to the separation.
930107:  Commanding Officer notified CHNAVPERS of Applicant’s discharge with an entry level separation by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry as evidenced by failure to reveal at the time of enlistment, a complete and accurate history of pre-service drug abuse. Commanding Officer’s comments (verbatim): “On 4 December 1992, SA F_ (Applicant) revealed his pre-service drug abuse to the Naval Submarine School Legal Office. He disclosed that he used LSD multiple times from 1989 to 1992, and tried marijuana once. He failed to reveal pre-service drug usage at enlistment at boot camp, and upon application for a security clearance. SA F_ (Applicant) has perpetrated a fraudulent enlistment and has been untruthful more than once; therefore, he has no potential for further useful naval service. In accordance with reference (b) (NAVOP 013/87) SA F_ (Applicant) was administratively separated from the naval service on 22 December 1992 with a discharge characterized as Entry Level Separation.”

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19921222 with an under honorable conditions (general) (to be administratively corrected to Entry Level Separation) by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1: By regulation, members discharged within the first 180 days of enlistment are given characterization of services as “Entry Level Separation” unless there were unusual circumstances regarding performance of conduct which would merit an “honorable” characterization. The Applicant’s service record did not contain any unusual circumstances during his less than six months in the military to warrant an upgrade. Relief denied. The Applicant should be aware that, with respect to nonservice-related administrative matters, i.e., VA benefits, civilian employment, educational pursuits, etc., an uncharacterized separation shall be considered the equivalent of an honorable or general (under honorable conditions) discharge.

 Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing career opportunities as requested in the issue. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge. In the Applicant’s case, the Board could discern no impropriety or inequity and therefore considered the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. Relief denied.

 The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 7/86, effective
16 Dec 86 until 19 Dec 93, Article 3630100, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF DEFECTIVE ENLISTMENTS AND INDUCTIONS DUE TO FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO NAVAL SERVICE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".


The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00003

    Original file (ND99-00003.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :900103: Application for Enlistment (DD Form 1966): Applicant failed to disclose any pre-service civil offenses.900425: Applicant provided a statement to Defense Investigative Service revealing pre-service civil arrest.900619: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under honorable conditions (general) by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry as evidenced by failure to reveal at the time of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01105

    Original file (ND03-01105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “Under Narrative Reason for Seperation: Fraudulent Entry to the best of my knowledge I did nothing to constitute a fraudulent Enlistment resulting in this discharge.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 870723 - 880131 COG Active: USN None Period of Service Under...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00660

    Original file (ND03-00660.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00660 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20030304, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to Convenience of the Government. On page two, item k, Separation Authority Action: it states my discharge should have been ‘characterized as General Under Honorable Conditions, based on fraudulent entry into the naval service.’ My DD-214 does not reflect the recommendation...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00152

    Original file (ND04-00152.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application: “I was 18 years old when I received this discharge and was advised that this discharge can be changed to a general if I maintained a clean civil record.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Letter from Applicant dated October 21, 2003 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01071

    Original file (ND03-01071.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :990312: USN Alcohol and Drug Abuse Screening Certificate (NAVCRUIT 1133/7): Applicant failed to disclose pre-service criminal activity, police record.990528: Commanding Officer, Recruit Training Command authorized Applicant’s discharge with an uncharacterized service by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry. By regulation, members discharged within the first 180 days of enlistment are given a service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00740

    Original file (ND00-00740.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Applicant's statement concerning V.A., requesting upgrade of discharge, change of reenlistment code to RE-1, and possible lawsuit (3 pages) List of Character References (5 individuals) Copies of ID's, business cards, pharmacy information, emergency shelter, case worker Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00473

    Original file (ND04-00473.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “Dear Chairperson:After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all evidence assembled for review, we continue to note the contention of the appellant in his request for a discharge upgrade of his current Un-Characterized discharge to that of Honorable.The FSM served on active service from July 15, 2003 to August 11, 2003 at which time he was discharged due to Fraudulent Entry...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00694

    Original file (ND02-00694.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00694 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020417, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason and separation code for the discharge be changed. Change separation code Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Statement from Applicant concerning issues dated April 4, 2003 with attached Exhibits A-H, J-N (34...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01043

    Original file (ND00-01043.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    991020: Branch Medical Clinic 237: Entry Level Medical Separation for existed prior to entry (EPTE) condition of Crohn's Disease. 991020: Senior Medical Officer, Branch Medical Clinic 237 recommends an entry level medical separation due to a medical problem that existed prior to entry in the naval service. The applicant had documented hospitalization in the past for his Crohn’s disease and was therefore discharged for fraudulent entry into the Navy because he did not list this information...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00028

    Original file (ND04-00028.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:I respectfully request my discharge categoration be changed in consideration of the following: Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Copy of DD Form 215 Employment Confirmation Letter dated October 27, 2003 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR...