Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01491
Original file (MD03-01491.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-LCpl, USMC
Docket No. MD03-01491

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030909. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list a representative on his DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040610. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER CONDITIONS OTHER THAN HONORABLE/Separation in lieu of trial by court-martial, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6419.





PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


 Issues, as stated
Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

 “1. I would like to be considered for an upgrade from under other than honorable condition to general under honorable conditions. I know I was wrong in going UA 3 days but I had had prior service from 1981 until 1986 without any incidents and even allowed to reenter the Marine Corps a year later. I ask that I be granted an upgrade so that I can use all my Veterans benefits I feel I earned before I erred and was discharged.”

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              810527 - 850526   HON
         Inactive: USMCR (J)               810425 - 810526  COG
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 870108               Date of Discharge: 881229
Length of Service (years, months, days):

          Active: 01 09 09 (Takes into account lost time.)
          Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 23                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 31

 Highest Rank: Cpl
Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 3.4                           Conduct: 3.4

Military Decorations: GCM

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SSDR
Days of Unauthorized Absence: 36

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER CONDITIONS OTHER THAN HONORABLE /Separation in lieu of trial by court-martial, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6419.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

870806:  Special Court-Martial.
          Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of cocaine.
          Findings: to Charge I, guilty.
         Sentence: Confinement for four months, forf of $100.00 for 3 mos., red to E-2.
 CA 871021: Sentence approved and ordered executed except for the confinement for four months was suspended of a period of six months.
871119:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Frequent involvement with financial difficulties.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
880106:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Frequent involvement with financial difficulties.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
881203:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Continuous tardiness to work.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

 880216:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Voluntary admittance to drug use.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

880721   NAVMC 118 (11): 48 hrs UA (AWOL)

880923   NAVMC 118 (11): 48 hrs UA (AWOL)

881001   NAVMC 118 (11): 10 day UA (AWOL)

881021   NAVMC 118 (11): 10 day UA (AWOL)

881026   NAVMC 118 (11): Termination of absence report when Marine surrendered.

881121:  Applicant, having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Art 27b, requested discharge for the good of the service to escape trial by court- martial. In the request the Applicant noted that his counsel had fully explained the elements of the offenses for which he was charged and that he understood the elements of the offenses. He further certified a complete understanding of the negative consequences of his actions and that characterization of service would be under other honorable conditions. The Applicant admitted guilt to the following violations of the UCMJ, Article 86 (Spec 1): on or about 880921 absent himself until on or about 881011; (Spec 2): on or about 881012 absent himself until on or about 881026; Article 91: was disrespectful in language toward a staff noncommissioned officer then know to him.

881122:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact. “Significantly poor pro/cons and a prior conviction for drug use make this man an excellent candidate for sure separation by GOS.”

 881130:  GCMCA [Commanding General, 1 st Marine Division (Rein)] determined that Applicant had no potential for further service, that separation in lieu of trial by court-martial was in the best interest of the service, and directed discharge under conditions other than honorable by reason of conduct triable by courts-martial.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

 Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19881229 under conditions other than honorable in lieu of trial by court-martial (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).
Issue 1: The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of service in question. No such error or inequity occurred during the Applicant’s tenure. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service or the applicant’s desire to avail himself of “Veterans benefits (he) feels (he) earned.” However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle, are examples of verifiable documentation that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The Applicant provided no evidence of post-service conduct. Relief not warranted.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Paragraph 6419, SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16C), Change 2, effective 15 May 84 until 26 Jun 89.

 B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, Unauthorized Absence; Article 91, Insubordinate Conduct Toward Warrant Officer, Noncommissioned Officer, or Petty Officer or Article 112a Wrongful Use, Possession, etc., of Controlled Substances .
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

 E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                   Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                   Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00101

    Original file (MD04-00101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00101 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031017. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 970829 - 970914 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01213

    Original file (MD03-01213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01213 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030709. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00265

    Original file (MD00-00265.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    [Not recommended for promotion to Cpl for 1997Prom Qtr because of recent pg 11] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.971023: Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant introduced no decisional issues for...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00808

    Original file (MD00-00808.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00808 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000608, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 931230 - 940404 COG Period of Service Under...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01257

    Original file (MD99-01257.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-01257 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990930, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00269

    Original file (MD03-00269.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days.

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01184

    Original file (MD99-01184.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-01184 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990903, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION This discharge was based on his conduct during this enlistment.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01444

    Original file (MD04-01444.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. 010202: GCMCA, Commanding General, Marine Corps Base, Quantico, VA, determined that Applicant had no potential for further service, that separation in lieu of trial by court-martial was in the best interest of the service, and directed discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of conduct triable by courts-martial. Only the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00576

    Original file (MD01-00576.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00576 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010327, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant is not eligible for further review by the Naval Discharge Review Board. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).A characterization of service of under other than...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01150

    Original file (MD99-01150.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-01150 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990825, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Specification 2: Use of marijuana Charge II: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 Specification: Unauthorized absence.