Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01150
Original file (MD99-01150.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD99-01150

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 990825, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a personal appearance hearing. The applicant listed American Legion as his representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A personal appearance hearing review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 001108. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned an inequity, buy no impropriety in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall change to: UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL)/Separation in lieu of trial by court-martial, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6419.




PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues (verbatim)

 1. (EQUITY ISSUE) This former member opines that a drug problem, developed during his second enlistment, impaired his ability to serve and contributed to his misconduct of record.

2. (EQUITY ISSUE) This former member further requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of his application..

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
VA Discharge Summary dated June 20, 1994
Police Record Check dated Oct 11, 2000
Letter of Reference from Mr. J_____ dated Oct 13, 2000
Letter of Reference from Ms. C____ dated Oct 17, 2000
Letter of Reference from Mr. H_____ undated

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              781108 - 811107  HON
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                781026 - 781107  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 811230               Date of Discharge: 850215

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 01 16
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 3

 Education Level: 11                        AFQT: 54

 Highest Rank: Cpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.2 (2)                       Conduct: 4.0 (2)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SSDR, GCM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 24

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER CONDITIONS OTHER THAN HONORABLE /Separation in lieu of trial by court-martial, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6419.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

820622:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Tardiness from his appointed place of duty.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

821129:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 134:
 Specification: Wrongfully have in his possession some amount of marijuana 820825.
Awarded forfeiture of $300.00 per month for 2 months, reduction to LCpl (E-3). Not appealed.
830315:  Applicant informed eligible but not recommended for promotion to Cpl because of recent NJP.
830620:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Unsatisfactory conduct and his continued minor infractions of the UCMJ.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

830628:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (4 specs):
 Specification 1: Absent from unit 1030 to 1340, 830616.
Specification 2: Absent from his appointed place of duty 0330 to 0456, 830617.
Specification 3: Absent from appointed place of duty 0730-1215, 830621.
Specification 4: Absent from appointed place of duty 0730, 830527 to 1023, 830527.
Awarded forfeiture of $175.00 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duties for 14 days. Not appealed.
830715:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Placed on weight control.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

831213:  Applicant informed not recommended for promotion to Cpl for the month of Feb. Shows a lack of initiative and desire.

840430:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Frequent involvement military/civilian.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

840504:  Applicant to unauthorized absence 1800, 4May84.

840529:  Applicant from unauthorized absence 1439, 29May84 (24 days/S).

840531:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Frequent involvement military/civilian, drug conviction, unauthorized absence, unable to follow orders, lack of attention to duty, failure to obey regulations, lackadaisical attitude, poor performance, unprofessional and immature attitude, misconduct documented by officer hours.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

840620:  Summary Court-Martial.
         Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 134 (3 specs).
         Specification 1: Possession of marijuana.
         Specification 2: Use of marijuana
         Charge II: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86
         Specification: Unauthorized absence.
         Finding: to Charge I and II and the specifications thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: Forfeiture of $397.00, confinement at hard labor for 28 days, reduced to Pvt (E-1).
         CA action 840620: Sentence approved and ordered executed.

840620:  Applicant to confinement.

840713:  Applicant from confinement.

840807:  Applicant assigned to weight control program.

 840822:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86:
 Specification: Fail to go at time prescribed to appointed place of duty 0645, 840820, to wit: muster for CG PFT.
Awarded forfeiture of $88.00 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duties for 7 days. Forfeiture and restriction suspended for 2 months. Not appealed.
840822:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Frequent involvement military/civilian, drug conviction, unauthorized absence, unable to follow orders, lack of attention to duty, failure to obey regulations, misconduct documented by office hours.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

840905:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Lack of judgement about not arranging ahead of time for his return trip from weekend liberty to CLNC.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

841002:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (4 specs):
 Specification 1: Fail to go at the time prescribed on 1130, 24Sep84, to wit: remedial PT.
Specification 2: Fail to go at the time prescribed on 1130, 25Sep84, to wit: remedial PT.
Specification 3: Fail to go at the time prescribed on 1130, 26Sep84, to wit: remedial PT.
Specification 4: Fail to go at the time prescribed on 1130, 1Oct84, to wit: remedial PT.
Awarded Restriction and extra duties for 7 days. Restriction and extra duty suspended for 2 months. Not appealed.
841002:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Frequent involvement military/civilian, drug conviction, frequent tardiness, unable to follow orders, failure to obey regulations, misconduct documented by office hours.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

841010:  Vacate suspended restriction and extra duty for 7 days awarded at NJP dated 840822.

841217:  NAVDRUGLAB, Norfolk, VA reports urine sample received 6Dec84 tested positive for THC.

850212:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under condition other than honorable by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense as evidenced by wrongfully use marijuana. (Extracted from discharge package found in previous casefolder. Xerox pages to include in SRB.)

850212:  Applicant, having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Art 27b, requested discharge for the good of the service to escape trial by court- martial. In the request the applicant noted that his counsel had fully explained the elements of the offenses for which he was charged and that he understood the elements of the offenses. He further certified a complete understanding of the negative consequences of his actions and that characterization of service would be under other honorable conditions. The applicant admitted guilt to the following violations of the UCMJ: Article 112A: Wrongfully use marijuana, which showed positive on a unit sweep urinalysis test conducted 3 Dec 1984.

850213:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

850214:  GCMCA [Commanding General, 2d Marine Division, FMF, Camp Lejeune] determined that applicant had no potential for further service, that separation in lieu of trial by court-martial was in the best interest of the service, and directed discharge under conditions other than honorable by reason of conduct triable by courts-martial.

 870512:  NDRB documentary record review Docket Number MD87-01031 conducted. Determination: discharge proper and equitable; relief not warranted.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 850215 under conditions other than honorable in lieu of trial by court-martial (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, and in conjunction with the factors listed in paragraph 9.3 of reference (a), it was determined that relief is warranted under equitable grounds even though the discharge was determined to have been otherwise equitable and proper at the time of issuance.

In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board does not accept drug abuse as a factor sufficient to exculpate the applicant from the consequences of his misconduct. The applicant must accept the consequences of his misconduct. No relief will be granted based on this issue.

In the applicant’s issue 2, the Board took into account the member’s post-service conduct to include letters of recommendation, drug rehabilitation documentation and testimony from the applicant substantiating a drug free lifestyle and continued involvement with his community. Based on the applicant’s issue 2 and as stated in the first paragraph, relief is granted.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6419, SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16C), Change 2, effective 15 May 84 until 26 Jun 89.

 B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a, wrongful use of marijuana.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to:
                  DA Military Review Boards Agency
                  Management Information and Support Directorate
                  Armed Forces Reading Room
                  Washington, D.C. 20310-1809

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  Washington Navy Yard
                  720 Kennon St SE Rm 309
                  Washington, D.C. 20374-5023     


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00176

    Original file (ND99-00176.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Unauthorized absence1245, 7Apr84.840424: Substance Abuse Report: Marijuana abuse, less than monthly, Jan80-Mar84, ashore off duty, urinalysis. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In response to the applicant’s issue 1 of post-service clemency, the Board found that the applicant’s post-service conduct was not sufficient to warrant an upgrade. The...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00734

    Original file (MD02-00734.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00734 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020425, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Specification 9: Unauthorized absence from remedial PT on 891031.Violation of UCMJ, Article 92:Specification: Derelict in duties in scoring only 45 points on a PFT on 891027.Awarded forfeiture of $391.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 45 days, reduction to PFC. ...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00357

    Original file (MD00-00357.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00357 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000121, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. 831017: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86:Specification: Unauthorized absence from 0400, 22Sep83 to 0400, 23Sep83 (1 day).Violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Specification: Violated BO P5000.2F by operating a M-51 dump truck without proper license on 1130, 27Jun83.Awarded correctional custody for 30 days, reduction to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00936

    Original file (MD03-00936.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00936 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030425. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01185

    Original file (MD03-01185.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01185 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030627. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Ten pages from Applicant’s service record Character reference from N_ N_, ARNP Character reference from R_ J. S_, MEd, Ed S, CM Letter from Applicant PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01213

    Original file (MD03-01213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01213 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030709. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00200

    Original file (MD04-00200.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested the service characterization received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. (For both Issues, please see my letter to Review Board)” ______________________________________________________________________ In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166 and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue in supplement to this Applicant’s petition.

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00566

    Original file (MD99-00566.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    920406: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.920406: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and pattern of misconduct. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case,...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01184

    Original file (MD99-01184.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-01184 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990903, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION This discharge was based on his conduct during this enlistment.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01491

    Original file (MD03-01491.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01491 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030909. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).Issue 1: The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service...