Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01419
Original file (MD03-01419.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD03-01419

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030827. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040608. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

 1. “To the respected members of the discharge review board,
this letter pertains to item 8 of DD form 293 and is the explanation of the “issues” that I believe directly effect my request for a upgrade of discharge.
In July of 2000 I recieved an other than honorable discharge from the United States Marine Corps for misconduct due to drug abuse. I was tested positive once for use of methamphetamines. I believe my discharge was improper due to the fact that it was based on an isolated incident. Other issues that I would like to be addressed are the facts that I served 29 months of service honorably as well as my actions and assistance to the Naval Criminal Investigative Service before, during, and after my positive urinalysis, summery court martial, and completion of sentence. One last issue that I would like to bring to the attention of this board is the fact that before I was processed for discharge I was questioned by my battalion commander. The formal conversation that persued questioned whether I wanted to continue my military career even though the Marine Corps has a zero tolerance policy on drug use.”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214
Applicant's statement, undated
Eight pages from Applicant's service record

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                980211            COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 980212               Date of Discharge: 000721

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 05 10
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 10                        AFQT: 58

 Highest Rank: PFC

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 3.2 (8)                       Conduct: 2.8 (9)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: MM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 29

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

980205:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
980624:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Your failure to be at your appointed place of duty, Drivers Improvement Course formation at 0730 on 980620. Conduct of this nature and disregard for military orders and regulation will not be tolerated.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
990726:  Applicant directed to report to Alcohol Treatment Facility on 990728 for an evaluation scheduled by the Battalion Substance Abuse Control Officer.
990728:  Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the Applicant to be drug dependent.

990729:  NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 990709, tested positive for amphetamine/methamphetamine.

 000120:  Summary Court-Martial.
          Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 112A:
         Specification: Wrongfully use amphetamine/methamphetamine, a schedule 1 controlled substance.
         Finding: to Charge I and the specification thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: Forfeiture of $670.00, confinement for 29 days, reduction to Pvt.
         CA action 000206: Sentence approved and ordered executed.

000406:  Summary Court-Martial.
         Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86:
         Specification: Unauthorized absence from 0630, 991206 to 0700, 000105 (29 days/surrendered).
         Finding: to Charge I and the specification thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: Forfeiture of $670.00, hard labor for 45 days, restriction for 60 days.
         CA action 000406: Sentence approved and ordered executed except for that portion of the punishment adjudging forfeiture of $670.00 which is suspended for 6 months.

000515:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
000515:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.

000515:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was Applicant's illegal use of amphetamine/methamphetamine.

000620:  Clinical Psychologist evaluation: Diagnosis: Axis I: (1) Polysubstance abuse, in remission, (2) Adjustment disorder with mixed emotional features. Axis II: Personality disorder NOS. Recommendation: Expeditious separation.

000628:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

000711:  Counseling regarding right to receive treatment prior to being discharged. Applicant choose to waive right for treatment for drug dependency. Applicant informed of VA treatment.

000714:  GCMCA [Commander, 2d Force Service Support Group] directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20000721 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. R elief denied.

The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


















Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00752

    Original file (MD01-00752.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of MTI College Enrollment Agreement Copy of Letter of Congratulation into MTI College Letter from Applicant PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC None Inactive: USMCR(J) 960622 - 961208 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 961209 Date of Discharge: 000810 Length of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00805

    Original file (MD01-00805.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The applicant used illegal drugs. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency (C, Part IV).

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00148

    Original file (MD00-00148.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00148 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 991102, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to Honorable. Not appealed.920713: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to Drug abuse.920721: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ, Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00747

    Original file (MD01-00747.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.970703: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Violation of BO1700.6H by underage consumption of alcoholic beverages.Awarded forfeiture of $200.00 per month for 2 months (forfeiture of $100.00 per month for 1 month (suspended for 6 months), 20 days restriction to the limits of Sscol, MCSSS, MCB CamLej without suspension from duty (10 days restriction suspended for 6 months). th...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00910

    Original file (MD00-00910.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was originally recommended for an honorable discharge, and I feel that based upon my service record an honorable discharge is justified. 970806: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.970828: Commanding officer recommended discharge general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00885

    Original file (MD01-00885.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00885 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010625, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days;...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00471

    Original file (MD00-00471.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Statement from applicant, dated February 3, 2000 Character reference from manager of Pep Boys Copy of applicant's DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC 840820 - 880712 HON Inactive: USMCR(J) 831031 - 840819 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 880713 Date of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00696

    Original file (MD01-00696.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214Letter from Assistant Majority Leader State Representative K___ G___Reference Letter from Marion County States Attorney J___ W. C____ PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC None Inactive: USMCR(J) 891212 - 900618 COG Period of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00597

    Original file (MD01-00597.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a review of the Former Service Member (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of the evidence assembled for review, we continue to note the contentions as set forth on the application by the appeallant of an upgrade of his current Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge to that of Honorable.The record reflects the FSM served in the United States Navy from October 27, 1999 to April 14, 2000, at...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00638

    Original file (MD00-00638.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    950510: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.950621: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the...