Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00597
Original file (MD01-00597.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD01-00597

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010329, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant listed Disabled American Veterans as the representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010906. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

 1. After a review of the Former Service Member (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of the evidence assembled for review, we continue to note the contentions as set forth on the application by the appeallant of an upgrade of his current Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge to that of Honorable.

The record reflects the FSM served in the United States Navy from October 27, 1999 to April 14, 2000, at which time he was discharged as noted above for drug abuse.

The FSM requests equitable relief in the manner as noted above, he believes the discharge currently held was unfair and given without due consideration to his previous good service and high proficiency marks. Also of record attesting to the FSM's character are those who have known the gentleman both before and after service.

As the representative this service requests consideration be given to equitable relief in the form of a General Discharge, Under Honorable Conditions.

We ask for the boards careful and sympathetic consideration of all the evidence of record used in rendering a fair and impartial decision. These issues do not supersede any issues previously submitted by the applicant.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Character reference dated November 12, 2000
Character reference dated January 24, 2001
Character reference, undated
Copies of DD Form 214 (2)
Copies of Depot Special Orders (4pgs)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                990728 - 991026  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 991027               Date of Discharge: 000414

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 05 18
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 5

Education Level: 10                        AFQT: 68

 Highest Rank: Pvt

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 3.6 (2)                       Conduct: 3.6 (2)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Rifle Marksman Badge

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

990728:  Initial enlistment contract documents admission of pre-service marijuana experimentation. Enlistment waiver granted. Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.

000301:  NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported applicant’s urine sample, received 000224, tested positive for THC.

000309:  Counseled regarding deficiencies, specifically, my illegal usage of a controlled substance marijuana as verified by NAVDRUGLAB R 011438Z Mar 00 BYZ. Necessary corrective actions explained. Sources of assistance identified. Disciplinary and administrative discharge warnings issued.
000313:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Wrongfully use marijuana between 3Feb200 and 17Feb00.
 Awarded forfeiture of $502.00 per month for 2 months, restriction for 60 days. Not appealed.
000314:  Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant to be a drug abuser, isolated incident.

000329:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
000329:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

000329:  Commanding Officer, Headquarters and Support Battalion recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was your use of marijuana, as identified by positive unit urinalysis.

000330:  Applicant directed to go on voluntary leave for a period not to exceed 90 days awaiting review of administrative separation.

000406:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

000414:  GCMCA [Commanding General] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 000414 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issue 1. The applicant believes the discharge currently held was unfair and given without due consideration to his previous good service and high proficiency marks. The applicant’s average proficiency and conduct evaluations of 3.6 / 3.6 are below average and do not suggest honorable service. The applicant used illegal drugs. On 000324, the applicant stated he would continue to use illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. The applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required. Relief denied.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 to Present.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a, wrongful use of a controlled substance.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01043

    Original file (ND02-01043.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issues, as submitted Dear Chairperson:After a review of the Former Service Member (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of the evidence assembled for review, we continue to support the contentions as set forth by the Applicant, in his request that he be given the opportunity to change his Under Other Than Honorable Discharge to an General (Under Honorable Conditions) Discharge. The (FSM) entered the United...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00596

    Original file (MD01-00596.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. After a review of the Former Service Member (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of the evidence assembled for review, we continue to note the request of the appeallant of an upgrade of his Other Than Honorable discharge to that of Honorable. The Board has no authority to change the reason for discharge from or to a physical disability.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00156

    Original file (ND02-00156.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020731. Documentation Only the service and medical records were reviewed, as the applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 010319 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A).

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00121

    Original file (MD02-00121.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00121 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 011017, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. L_, Capt, USMC, undated Separation Authority (CG, 3d MAW) dtd 1 May 00Special Court-Martial proceedings (18 pages) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 950920 - 960421 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 960422...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00130

    Original file (MD04-00130.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00130 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031022. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19960202 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A).

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01152

    Original file (MD99-01152.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, may be considered by the NDRB. You...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00244

    Original file (MD02-00244.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record reflects the FSM served on active duty from July 28, 1992 to March 13, 1995 at which time he received the current OTH discharge due to a pattern of misconduct, due to drug abuse. The Board found nothing in the applicant’s record of service that mitigates his drug use sufficient to warrant an upgrade to the characterization of service. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01061

    Original file (MD03-01061.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of evidence assembled for review, we continue to note the contention of the appellant in his request for a discharge upgrade of his current General Under Honorable Conditions discharge to that of Honorable.The FSM served on active service from June 30, 1999 to May 10, 2002 at which time he was discharged due to Misconduct. ...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01206

    Original file (MD02-01206.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered: None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 930217 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 930218 Date of Discharge: 931217 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 00 10 00 Inactive: None 931026: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01020

    Original file (MD03-01020.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Four pages from Applicant’s service record Applicant’s DD Form 214 (2) Job/character reference, dated May 9, 2003 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active:...