Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01127
Original file (MD03-01127.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-CAPT, USMC
Docket No. MD03-01127

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030612. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant designated civilian counsel as the representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040423. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Discharge Involuntary – Determination of Service Secretary, authority: SECNAVINST 1960.2B & MARCORSEPMAN Par. 4102.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 No issues were submitted by the Applicant.

Issues submitted by Applicant’s counsel/representative ( CIVILIAN COUNSEL):
1. “The Petitioner submits that he has been unjustly subjected to the imposition of an Other than Honorable Discharge by the United States Marine Corps and respectfully requests that this Honorable Board set aside said discharge and upgrade his discharge characterization to General (Under Honorable Conditions).”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Findings of Physical Evaluation Board dtd Oct 19, 1998
Report Chit dtd Jul 14, 1998
Punitive Letter of Reprimand dtd Jul 16, 1998
Appeal from Non-Judicial Punishment dtd Jul 22, 1998
Request for Resignation for Cause dtd Jan 20, 1999
Denial of Request for Resignation dtd Feb 12, 1999
Waiver of Board of Inquiry dtd Mar 5, 1999
Copy of DD Form 214
Letter-Discharge from the USMC dtd May 4, 1999
2 nd Letter-Discharge from USMC dtd May 4, 1999 with DD Form 214
Set Aside of NJP ICO SK1 J_ R. M_ dtd Mar 3, 1999
Letter from Capt T_ dtd Feb 22, 1999
Letter from G_ D. M_ dtd Mar 11, 1999
Recommendation for Admin Sep dtd Apr 15, 1998

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: None
         Active: USMCR(OCAN)      930628 - 931209  To accept commission

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Commission: 931210      Date of Discharge: 990512

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 05 05 03
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 27       

Education Level: 16     

Highest Rank: CAPT

 Final Officer Performance Evaluation Averages : Officer performance reports were available to the Board for review thru 19980804

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, Marksman Rifle Badge, Marksman Pistol Badge

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance, as corrected with issuance of DD Form 215):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Discharge Involuntary – Determination of Service Secretary, authority: SECNAVINST 1920.6B & MARCORSEPMAN Par. 4102.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

980716:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: In the vicinity of Virginia Beach, VA and Cleveland, OH on diverse occasions between Dec 97 and 10 Jul 98 violate a lawful order, to wit: OPNAVINST 5370.2A by wrongfully engaging in an unduly familiar personal relationship not respecting differences in rank and grade with an enlisted member of his unit, to wit: writing letters to, inappropriately vacationing with and engaging in a sexual relationship with Master-at-Arms “frocked” First Class J_ R. M_, U.S. Navy.
         Violation of UCMJ, Article 133: In the vicinity of Virginia Beach, VA and Cleveland, OH on diverse occasions between Dec 97 and 10 Jul 98, wrongfully and dishonorably have a sexual relationship with said Master-at-Arms “frocked” First Class J_ R. M_, USN, an enlisted married woman.
         Violation of UCMJ, Article 134: In the vicinity of Virginia Beach, VA and Cleveland, OH on diverse occasions between Dec 97 and 10 Jul 98, willfully and wrongfully fraternize and associate with Master-at-Arms “frocked” First Class J_ R. M_, USN, an enlisted woman assigned to his unit and to a position directly under his supervision, on terms of military equality, by writing letters to, inappropriately vacationing with and engaging in sexual intercourse.
         Violation of UCMJ, Article 134: In that Captain D_ (Applicant), a married man, did, in the vicinity of Virginia Beach, VA and Cleveland, OH on diverse occasion between Feb 98 and 10 July 98, wrongfully have sexual intercourse with Master-at-Arms “frocked” First Class J_ R. M_, USN, a married woman not his wife.
 Awarded a written letter of reprimand and 15 days restriction.
980716:  Punitive Letter of Reprimand issued to Applicant. [PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT]
980722:  Applicant appealed the 16 July 1998 nonjudicial punishment.
[PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT]
981019:  Physical Evaluation Board found Applicant unfit for duty and recommended separation with severance pay (10% disability rating). [PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT]
990120:  Applicant voluntarily tendered his qualified resignation in lieu of processing for administrative separation for cause. [PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT]
990212:  Commandant of the Marine Corps denied Applicant’s request for separation in lieu of further processing for administrative separation for cause. [PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT]
990222:  CO, USS BATAAN, letter to the President, Board of Inquiry: Recommended Applicant be required to show cause for retention in the U.S. Marine Corps and recommended that the characterization of discharge be general (under honorable conditions). [PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT]

990305:  Applicant voluntarily waived his Board of Inquiry and acknowledged that he may receive an under other than honorable discharge but did request a general (under honorable conditions). [PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT]

990415:  Headquarters U.S. Marine Corps recommended to the Secretary of the Navy that Applicant’s request for resignation be denied and since the Applicant submitted a waiver of the Board of Inquiry, that Applicant be separated for cause based upon misconduct and substandard performance and his service be characterized as under other than honorable conditions.

990420:  ASN (M&RA) approved Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions.

990422:  Commandant, Marine Corps naval message directed Applicant’s discharge with a general (under honorable conditions).

990504:  Commanding Officer, Headquarters & Service Company, U.S. Marine Corps Forces, Atlantic advised the Applicant that his request for discharge is approved under other than honorable conditions by reason of “discharged involuntary – determination of service secretary.”

990512:  DD Form 214 issued to Applicant reflecting a characterization of service as “general (under honorable conditions).”

990512:  DD Form 215 issued to Applicant correcting the characterization of service as “under other than honorable conditions.”

990517:  Commandant, Marine Corps, modified the discharge authority whereby directing under other than honorable conditions characterization of service.

990621:  Applicant’s Attorney advised the Commanding Officer, Headquarters & Service Company, U.S. Marine Corps Forces, Atlantic, that Applicant was issued a DD Form 214 reflecting a “general (under honorable conditions)” and a DD Form 215 was subsequently issued correcting the characterization of service to “under other than honorable conditions” and requested an explanation.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19990512 under other than honorable conditions due to determination of the Service Secretary (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issue 1. The Board found no indication that the Applicant was improperly or inequitably assigned the characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The characterization of service directed in CMC message 220812Z APR 99 and listed on the Applicant’s original DD Form 214 was an administrative error. The Applicant acknowledged that he may be separated under other than honorable conditions. HQMC recommended that Applicant be separated under other than honorable conditions and the separation authority, Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower & Reserve Affairs) approved the recommendation. A characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions is warranted when the member's conduct constitutes a significant departure from that expected of a Marine. T he Applicant’s service was marred by his fraternization with an enlisted Sailor. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his disobedience of the orders and directives which regulate good order and discipline in the naval service, and falls short of that required for an honorable or under honorable characterization of service. An upgrade is inappropriate. Relief denied.

The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Discharge action due to misconduct takes precedence over disability separations per SECNAVINST 1850.4D. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of service in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s service. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.






Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 1920.6B (ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION OF OFFICERS) effective 13 Dec 1999 until Present establishes policies, standards and procedures for the administrative separation of Navy and Marine Corps officers from the naval service in accordance with Title 10, United States Code and DoD Directive 1332.30 of 14 Mar 97.
B. Chapter 4, Paragraph 4102 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E, effective 18 Aug 1995), PROCESSING FOR SEPARATION.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


.

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01305

    Original file (MD02-01305.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ]010628: Commanding Officer, Basic School, Marine Corps Combat Development Command, Quantico, VA, recommended Applicant's retention in lieu of separation for misconduct due to civilian conviction of two counts of indecent exposure and failing to demonstrate acceptable qualities of leadership required of an officer in his grade when he lied to a police officer. 011015: CG, Training and Education Command, recommended Applicant be administratively separated as a probationary officer and his...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00220

    Original file (MD02-00220.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00220 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020108, requested that the reason for the discharge be changed to RESIGN. 991221: Punitive Letter of Reprimand issued to applicant.991222: Applicant voluntarily tendered his unqualified resignation for cause in lieu of processing for administrative separation for cause.991223: CO, 1 st MCD, Garden City, NJ forwarded applicant's resignation for cause letter to the Secretary of the Navy recommending...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600225

    Original file (MD0600225.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The incident that occurred on 1 Sep 01 was the one and only time that I have broken the law. 031028: Commandant of the Marine Corps (//s// Deputy Commandant for Manpower and Reserve Affairs) forwards Report of Nonjudicial Punishment to Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) for review and final action, recommending approval of Captain M_’s (Applicant) qualified resignation request and that his service be characterized as General (Under Honorable Conditions) with a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500419

    Original file (MD0500419.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By unanimous vote, the BOI recommended that that Applicant be separated from the naval service for the reasons listed above and the service be characterized as other than honorable.020211: Applicant’s request denied. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (B and C).The Applicant contends that his discharge was improper because the Board of Inquiry (BOI), which...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00058

    Original file (MD03-00058.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00058 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20020930, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. ISSUE ONE My discharge was improper because I was awarded an Honorable Discharge Certificate. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 1920.6A (ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION OF OFFICERS) effective 21 Nov 1983 until 12 Dec 1999 establishes policies, standards and procedures for the administrative separation of Navy and Marine...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00588

    Original file (ND01-00588.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00588 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010326, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. As explained in Enclosure 2, her Application for Correction before the Board of Correction of Naval Records, she was discharged based upon her perceived over familiarity with an enlisted subordinate while stationed at NAS Adak, Alaska. The summary of service clearly documents that a commission of a serious offense was...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00848

    Original file (MD03-00848.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed the Board first conducts a record review prior to any personal appearance hearing. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00751

    Original file (MD01-00751.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's representative requested that the reason for separation be change to "Secretarial Authority". Dear members of the board: The following issues are the reasons my discharge should be upgraded from a general discharge to an honorable discharge. Additionally, advised applicant is submitting a letter of resignation and requested leave awaiting separation.990730: Applicant tendered a resignation of commission in lieu of processing for administrative separation for cause,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01147

    Original file (MD04-01147.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to Secretarial Authority. Whether an other-than-honorable discharge was an appropriate characterization.2. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 1920.6B (ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION OF OFFICERS) effective 13 Dec 1999 until Present establishes policies, standards and procedures for the administrative separation of Navy and Marine Corps...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD0401147

    Original file (MD0401147.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to Secretarial Authority. The summary of service clearly documents that unacceptable conduct was the reason the applicant was discharged. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 1920.6B (ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION OF OFFICERS) effective 13 Dec 1999 until Present establishes policies, standards and procedures for the administrative separation...