Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00773
Original file (MD03-00773.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Sgt, USMC
Docket No. MD03-00773

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20021218. The Applicant requests the reason for the discharge be changed to “EOE.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040212. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service and the reason for discharge was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the narrative reason of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: HONORABLE/NONRETENTION ON ACTIVE DUTY, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 1005.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated
Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“1. My discharge was honorable but my separation authority code, separation code and reentry codes are incorrect. It states that I was passed over 2 times but I was only passed over one time for promotion. That year was September 1997 only. I had not reached my high tenure of 13 years. My high tenure would have been January 11, 1999. This issue is only part of the situation. Part 2 is that I was convicted at a summary-courts martial in February 1997 and had to forfeit $200.00. This was one isolated incident in 12 years and 3 months of active duty service. The judge did not order me discharged but the commanding officer used it as a bar to discharge me which is against Marine Corps regulations in “Marine Corps Separation Manual par. 6106.2.” This was done by a negative reenlistment recommendation based on the courts-martial even after my immediate OIC recommended in favor of me. I would like my separation code and reenlistment codes to be accurate with respect to my characterization of discharge and actual events at the time of discharge.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
 Seven pages from MCO P1900.16
Fitness Report
Recommendation for reenlistment from GySgt J.P. O_
Recommendation for reenlistment from SSgt N_ J_
Recommendation for reenlistment from SSgt R.J. S_
Recommendation for reenlistment from GySgt P.S. R_
Recommendation for reenlistment from MSgt J.O. J_
Recommendation for reenlistment from SSgt A.G. C_
Recommendation for reenlistment from GySgt J.E. F_
Recommendation for reenlistment from GySgt A. C_
Enlistment contract into SCNG dated 27 August, 1998
Active Duty orders dated 28 January, 2003

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              841002 - 881001  HON
                                             900201 – 940111  HON
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                831031 – 841001  COG
 891025 - 900131  COG
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 940112               Date of Discharge: 980411

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 04 03 00
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 27                          Years Contracted: 4 (3 months extension)

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 67

 Highest Rank: Sgt

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages :

All Fitness Reports were available for review

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: GCM (w/2*), SSDR (w/3*), NDSM, NUC (2), KLM (K), SASM, LoA (2)

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

HONORABLE/NONRETENTION ON ACTIVE DUTY, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 1005.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

950503:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [UA, and failure to call in after leave.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

970210:  Summary Court-Martial.
 Violation of UCMJ, Article 91: Assault on a SNCO.
         Sentence: Forfeiture of $100 per month for 2 months, letter of reprimand.
                   970210: CA action. Approved and ordered executed.

 980303:  Applicant informed by Commanding Officer that he is not recommended for reenlistment, because of nonretention on active duty. Assigned reenlistment code of RE-4.
        

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was honorably discharged on 19980411 due to nonretention on active duty (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1. The Applicant was discharged at the expiration of his current enlistment contract due to his nonretention on active duty, not for the sole reason that he may have failed selection to Staff Sergeant. No other narrative reason more clearly describes the circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s discharge. The Board found no indication that the Applicant was improperly or inequitably denied retention and the statements and documentation provided by the Applicant did not refute the presumption of regularity in this case. Relief denied.

Concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter.

The Applicant’s discharge characterization and narrative reason accurately reflect his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 1005, DISCHARGE FOR EXPIRATION OF ENLISTMENT OR FULFILLMENT OF SERVICE OBLIGATION , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00255

    Original file (MD00-00255.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00255 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 991214, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions and entry level separation or uncharacterized. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The applicant’s representative submitted the following as Issue 5:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00345

    Original file (MD02-00345.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00345 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020129, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable, with a favorable reentry code. The narrative reason for my discharge is noted as a "personality disorder". 000523: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general) for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a medical diagnoses of suffering from a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00923

    Original file (MD02-00923.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pt contracted for safety and denied active suicidal/homicidal ideations. The Board found no documentation to support the Applicant’s allegations that he was hazed, harassed or that his chain of command violated his rights to privacy. The Applicant’s conduct evaluation average and summary court-martial record warranted a characterization of service of under honorable conditions (general).

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00166

    Original file (MD00-00166.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00166 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 991112, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Reference his attempt to form his own company. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant’s issue, and that of his representative, is that he warrants clemency because he...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00937

    Original file (MD03-00937.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00147

    Original file (MD00-00147.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Sentence: Reduction to E-1 and a bad conduct discharge. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00814

    Original file (MD03-00814.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The issue presented in this Application is whether or not my Bad Conduct Discharge from the U.S. Marine Corps, which was adjudged at a special court martial on 8 August 1990, should be upgraded to Honorable. However, at the time I requested relief, my discharge had recently been adjudged and the Board properly found that I failed to introduce new evidence of sufficient merit to extenuate, mitigate, or excuse the misconduct of my record, which was a 306 day unauthorized absence.It has how...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00795

    Original file (MD02-00795.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00795 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020513, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. He made go to a community college, full time so I can qualify to be come a U.S. Marine Oct 18, 1998 I got my diploma on the 19 th I left for boot camp. The day I regret walking away, from the thing that made me proud and happy.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00141

    Original file (ND04-00141.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00141 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031029. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. My narrative reason for seperation states, “Personality Disorder”.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00849

    Original file (MD03-00849.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or entry level separation or uncharacterized and the reason for the discharge be changed to SECRETARY AUTHORITY. I was in the Marine Corps for five years and nine months and in only four week’s as a drill instructor in platoon 2082 that was all thrown all away. Since my separation from the Marine Corps I have obtained a job and I have put all the knowledge and discipline that I...