Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01308
Original file (MD02-01308.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD02-01308

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020910, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requested a personal appearance hearing discharge review before a traveling panel closest to Bakersfield, CA. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter, Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing and also advised that the NDRB does not travel; all hearings are held in the Washington, D.C. area.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030612. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

1. Respectfully request my character of service changed from “Under other than Honorable” to “Honorable or General under Honorable.”

I loved being in the Marine Corps and I made a mistake at a concert that I attended. I have regretted that date ever since.

Request to have my discharge upgraded.

Documentation

In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:

Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                990511 - 991114  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 991115               Date of Discharge: 010511

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 05 27 (Doesn’t exclude confinement time.)
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 5

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 50

 Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 3.5 (5)                       Conduct: 3.7 (5)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Marksman Rifle Badge

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

001025:  Applicant consented to urinalysis testing.

 001106:  NAVDRUGLAB San Diego, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 001027, tested positive for THC - marijuana.

001130:  NCIS report contained in Applicant’s service record.

010215:  Summary Court-Martial.
         Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances.
         Specification: During October 2000, Applicant at unknown locations, and on at least 2 separate occasions, wrongfully used marijuana (THC), a controlled substance.
         Finding: to Charge I and the specification thereunder - guilty.
         Sentence: Confinement for 21 days and reduced to E-1.
         CA action 010215: Sentence approved and ordered executed.

010321:  SACC evaluation: Applicant does not meet DSM IV criteria for drug abuse/dependency. Recommend admin separation.

010409:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by positive urinalysis test results for THC.
010409:  Applicant requested retention in lieu of discharge action.

 010410:  Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to make a statement and the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
010417:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Commanding Officer’s comments (verbatim): “Private C_ (Applicant) was thoroughly counseled prior to his entry into the Untied States Marine Corps that illegal drugs and military service are absolutely incompatible. The Department of Defense and U.S. Marine Corps leadership feel so strongly about the seriousness of illegal drug use that this is one of the few offenses that require a waiver for entry into our service as well as a counseling statement acknowledging the consequences for violating Article 112a of the UCMJ: wrongful use of a controlled substance. Prior to taking his enlistment oath he voluntarily signed this agreement which stated that he would adhere to this policy or he would be discharged from the U.S. Marine Corps under other than honorable conditions. Private C_ (Applicant) cannot be trusted to honor his core values and I highly recommend that he should be separated under other than honorable conditions for illegal substance abuse.”

010427:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

010502:  GCMCA [CG, 3D MAW] directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 010511 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. Relief denied.
The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00706

    Original file (MD03-00706.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00706 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030310. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review.

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00991

    Original file (MD00-00991.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00991 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000828, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In considering the applicant’s issue, the Board must inform the applicant the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00164

    Original file (MD04-00164.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:“Issue 1: My discharge was inequitable because it was based on 1 isolated incident in 21 months of service with no other adverse action. In the absence of a complete discharge package, the Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B) and, after a thorough review...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00232

    Original file (MD02-00232.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00232 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020109, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. For SPD Code’s GKK1 and HKK1, the Narrative Reason for Separation is “MISCONDUCT” (Listed on page A-6 of MCO P1900.16E, effective 18 Aug 95)SPD English Description GKK1 Drug abuse (with board)HKK1 Drug abuse (board required but waived)Characterization of service is written “HONORABLE”, “GENERAL ( UNDER HONORABLE...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00990

    Original file (MD00-00990.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.971103: NAVDRUGLAB [San Diego, CA], reported applicant’s urine sample, received 971024, tested positive for THC.971206: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A:Specification: Wrongfully use a controlled substance.Awarded forfeiture of $450.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 45 days, reduction to Pvt. After a thorough review of the records, supporting...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00663

    Original file (MD01-00663.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00663 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010409, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00425

    Original file (MD03-00425.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00425 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030116. This former member further requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this application.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Two photos of Applicant Letter from CANG...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00674

    Original file (MD01-00674.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copies of DD Form 214 (2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC None Inactive: USMCR(J) 840728 - 850722 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 850723 Date of Discharge: 870408 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 08 10 Inactive: None 870108: Commanding Officer,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00889

    Original file (MD04-00889.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Mandatory processing for separation is required for Marines who abuse illegal drugs. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00942

    Original file (MD04-00942.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00942 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040518. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to uncharacterized. Reenlistment policy of the Marine Corps is promulgated by the Commandant, United States Marine Corps, Code MMEA, 3280 Russell Road, Quantico, VA 22134.