Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00053
Original file (MD03-00053.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PVT, USMC
Docket No. MD03-00053

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 20021002, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20030828. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

1. I have no supporting documents. I just wish to reenlist and my current discharge will not allow it. I have matured a lot since then and have no intentions of jeopardizing my military career again.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copies of DD Form 214 (2)
Letter from Applicant dated October 25, 2002

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                000118 - 000119  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 000120               Date of Discharge: 000822

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 07 03
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 56

 Highest Rank: PFC

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.2 (1)                       Conduct: 4.2 (1)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Rifle Expert Badge

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

000113:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.

000517:  NAVDRUGLAB [SAN DIEGO, CA], reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 000512, tested positive for [THC].
000608:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: At SACo, HqSptBn, SOI, MCB, CamPen tested positive for THC on a urinalysis conducted on 000509.
 Awarded forfeiture of $502.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 45 days, reduction to E-1. Not appealed.
000608:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
000608:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

000608:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was Private S_'s wrongful use of illicit drugs. On May 2000 Private S_ tested positive for marijuana which was later adjudicated at nonjudicial punishment.

000711:  Directed to voluntary leave for an indefinite period while Administrative Separation was being reviewed.

000713:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

000717:  GCMCA [Commanding General] directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20000822 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. Relief denied.

Concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter. Relief is therefore denied.

The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00925

    Original file (MD01-00925.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00925 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010711, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. GKK1 Misconduct-Drug abuse (with administrative discharge board)HKK1 Misconduct-Drug abuse (administrative discharge board required but waived) Characterization of service is written “HONORABLE”, “UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL)” or “UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS”( See page 1-33 of MCO P1900.16D, effective...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00942

    Original file (MD04-00942.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00942 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040518. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to uncharacterized. Reenlistment policy of the Marine Corps is promulgated by the Commandant, United States Marine Corps, Code MMEA, 3280 Russell Road, Quantico, VA 22134.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00939

    Original file (MD03-00939.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00939 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030424. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Mistakes can happen for one or two reasons, the first is for you to Learn from the mistake.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00559

    Original file (MD02-00559.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-PFC, USMC Docket No. MD02-00559 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020321, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 021217.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01459

    Original file (MD03-01459.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Not appealed.020910: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by testing positive for a controlled substance.020910: Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01032

    Original file (MD04-01032.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. He is disqualified for 45 days because of marijuana use at the time of examination.010111: Applicant separated without military obligation from the Delayed Entry Program (DEP).010207: Initial enlistment contract documents admission of pre-service marijuana experimentation. This issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00954

    Original file (MD02-00954.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 000125 - 000201 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 000202 Date of Discharge: 010309 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 01 08 Inactive: None After a thorough review of the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00232

    Original file (MD02-00232.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00232 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020109, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. For SPD Code’s GKK1 and HKK1, the Narrative Reason for Separation is “MISCONDUCT” (Listed on page A-6 of MCO P1900.16E, effective 18 Aug 95)SPD English Description GKK1 Drug abuse (with board)HKK1 Drug abuse (board required but waived)Characterization of service is written “HONORABLE”, “GENERAL ( UNDER HONORABLE...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00679

    Original file (MD04-00679.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00679 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040315. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reentry into the naval service or any other of the Armed Forces, nor can reenlistment serve as a basis for which the Board grants relief.

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00823 (4)

    Original file (MD99-00823 (4).rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found the applicant’s equity issues to be without merit. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ. You may obtain a copy of DoD...