Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01111
Original file (ND02-01111.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-ATAA, USN
Docket No. ND02-01111

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020806, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant listed American Legion as the representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030722. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

1. (Equity Issue) His violation of the UCMJ notwithstanding, this former member opines that his overall service record warrants a fully honorable characterization of service.

2. (Equity Issue) This former member further requests that the Board include provision of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this application.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     None
         Active: USN                        None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 941208               Date of Discharge: 970130

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 01 16
         Inactive: 00 00 07

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 8

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 37

 Highest Rate: AN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.00 (1)    Behavior: 1.00 (1)                OTA: 2.17 ( 5.0 Evals )

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

941215:  Ordered to active duty for 36 months under the Airman Apprenticeship program.

960521:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence.
         Award: Admonition: Oral, forfeiture of $65.00 pay per month for 1 month. No indication of appeal in the record.
9610xx:  Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the Applicant to be a drug abuser, not drug dependent.

961211:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of marijuana.
 Award: No adjudication found in record. No indication of appeal in the record.
970121:  Commander Naval Air Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet authorized the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).
ONLY PARTIAL DISCHARGE PACKAGE AVAILABLE.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 970130 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. Relief denied.
Issue 2. The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity occurred during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle, are examples of verifiable documentation that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The Applicant’s evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate the offense for which he was discharged. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 14, effective
03 Oct 96 until 11 Dec 97, Article 3630620 SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DRUG ABUSE.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


 .

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00762

    Original file (ND04-00762.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00710

    Original file (ND00-00710.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Statement from applicant Copy of memorandum dated April 13, 1999 Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 880222 - 910221 HON USN 910222 - 970130 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 880205 - 880221 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 970131 Date of Discharge: 990430...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00251

    Original file (ND04-00251.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Appealed denied 970227.970305: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by all your drug incidents in your current enlistment970306: Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00681

    Original file (ND99-00681.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board determined this issue is without merit. The NDRB reviews the propriety (did the Navy follow its own rules in processing the applicant for discharge) and equity (did the applicant receive a discharge characterization in keeping with Navy guidance or was the characterization...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00326

    Original file (ND01-00326.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Letter from applicant's father dated January 17, 2001 Letter to applicant's father from Commanding Officer dated July 22, 1997 Letter from applicant's father to Commanding Officer dated July 2, 1997 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 970130 -...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00195

    Original file (ND01-00195.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00195 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001205, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00743

    Original file (ND01-00743.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Mr. (applicant) enlisted in the United States Navy in August 1997. The Board found not evidence in the applicant’s official records nor did the applicant provide any documentation to show that his military service was outstanding at any time. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00545

    Original file (ND02-00545.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00545 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020314, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. 890915: CNMPC BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), Change 6, effective 11 Jan 89 until 13 Jun 90, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00310

    Original file (ND04-00310.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. Patient is drug dependent.940914: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged honorable by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse; authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.No discharge package available for review PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00532

    Original file (ND02-00532.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    940202: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general). PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 940216 under honorable conditions (general) for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). Drug abuse...