Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00545
Original file (ND02-00545.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-RMSN, USN
Docket No. ND02-00545

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020314, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requested a personal appearance hearing before the board in the Washington National Capital Region. The Applicant listed the American Legion as the representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A personal appearance discharge review hearing was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030317. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service at the time of issue. The Board’s vote was four to one that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 A personal appearance discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on XXXXXX. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 If appropriate add the following:
The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214. Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation should read: “_____________” vice “__________”. The original DD Form 214 should be corrected or reissued as appropriate.






THIS IS THE CORRECT SHELL FOR Misconduct - Drug abuse (Use) effective 890111 - 900613 .

THE FINDING FOR Drug abuse, (3630620) IS EFFECTIVE FOR 890111 - 900613 ONLY.

SPN CODE HKK. THE SPN CODE IS EFFECTIVE 860911 - 930627.

A general discharge is written “UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL)”

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

1. This former member avers that his drug and alcohol dependence contributed to and sufficiently extenuated his misconduct of record to warrant recharacterization of service to under honorable conditions.

2. This former member further requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this application.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Letter to Board from Applicant, undated
Cumberland Diagnostic and Treatment Center Award Certificate dated January 30, 1995
Cumberland Diagnostic and Treatment Center Award Certificate dated December 20, 1994
Manhattan Community College Award Certificate dated May 21, 1994
ARRIVE Certificate of Completion from March 21, 1994 – May 16, 1994
USPS Notice of Rating Eligibility issued 20 September, 2001
USPS Notice of Rating Eligibility issued 20 September, 2001
FEDEX memo dated February 7, 2003
FEDEX memo dated March 12, 2003

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     840424 - 840710  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 840711               Date of Discharge: 891030

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 05 03 20
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 28

 Highest Rate: RM3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.56 (5)    Behavior: 3.76 (6)                OTA: 3.60

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SSDR, GCM, Letter of Commendation

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

840717:  Applicant briefed on Navy's policy of drug and alcohol abuse.
861114:  Applicant extended enlistment for 4 months.

880811:  Applicant extended enlistment for 22 months.

890324:  Counseling: Advised of deficiency (performance and personal behavior), notified of corrective actions and assistance available.

890511:  NAVDRUGLAB, Norfolk, VA, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 890502, tested positive for cocaine.

890602:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongfully use cocaine on 26Apr89.
         Award: Forfeiture of $425 per month for 2 months, restriction for 45 days, reduction to RMSN. No indication of appeal in the record.
890615:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by nonjudicial punishment dated 2 June 1989 which indicated Applicant wrongfully used cocaine.
890618:  Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.
890714:  An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.

890721:  Drug dependency evaluation: Applicant non-dependent, drug abuser. Recommended separation.

890810:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). Commanding Officer’s comments (verbatim): RMSN (Applicant) freely admits he has violated the Navy's well-known policy of zero tolerance. Further, he does not display exceptional potential for further useful service based on his prior acceptable, but lackluster, performance. I concur with the Administrative Board convened in his case, and recommend immediate discharge under other than honorable conditions.

890915:  CNMPC BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

980720:  NDRB documentary record review Docket Number ND97-01237 conducted. Determination: discharge proper and equitable; relief not warranted.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 891130 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1. The Board found that the Applicant was evaluated by a competent medical authority on 890721 who determined that he was not dependent on illegal drugs or alcohol at the time of his discharge. Nonetheless, the Applicant’s illegal drug use warranted processing for separation under other than honorable conditions. Relief denied.

Issue 2. The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity occurred during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. As noted above, good conduct in civilian life is not in and of itself a sufficient basis to upgrade an unfavorable discharge. While the Board commends the Applicant for the positive steps he has taken since his discharge, the Applicant’s evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate the offense for which he was discharged. Relief not warranted.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), Change 6, effective 11 Jan 89 until 13 Jun 90, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls10.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00588

    Original file (ND02-00588.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issue 2: Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00044

    Original file (ND01-00044.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    891005: CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 891006 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). In response to the applicant’s issue 2, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00801

    Original file (ND00-00801.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 871218 Date of Discharge: 891003 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 05 23 Inactive: 00 03 25 Comments: No potential for future naval...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01231

    Original file (ND99-01231.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    890307: Appeal of NJP denied.890309: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to Drug abuse evidenced by your service record and your urinalysis test on 880920.890321: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ, Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board. Additionally, the NDRB is under no obligation to conduct a second Admin...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00130

    Original file (ND03-00130.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel; all hearings are held in the Washington DC area. Age at Entry: 22 Years Contracted: 8 Education Level: 12 AFQT: 34 Highest Rate: BTFA Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance: 2.40 (2) Behavior: 2.40 (2) OTA: 2.40 Military Decorations: None Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None Days of Unauthorized Absence: 9 Character, Narrative Reason,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00186

    Original file (ND00-00186.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    890624: CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to Drug abuse (Use). PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 890621 under Other Than Honorable conditions for misconduct due to Drug abuse (Use) (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00744

    Original file (ND00-00744.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. (Equity Issue) As the documentary evidence of record supports, this former member opines that his post-service conduct has been sufficiently creditable to warrant the Board's clemency relief as authorized under provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 9.3. No indication of appeal in the record.921008: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00165

    Original file (ND01-00165.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Letter from applicant's parents, dated November 14, 2000 Copy of DD Form 214 Letter from applicant's parents, dated January 9, 2001 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00898

    Original file (ND03-00898.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. No indication of appeal in the record.991109: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00247

    Original file (ND03-00247.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. 910913: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. You may view DoD Directive...