Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00387
Original file (ND02-00387.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-GSMFA, USN
Docket No. ND02-00387

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020214, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 021114. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910 - 142 (formerly 3630605).

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

 1. Prior to discharge was told by chain of command that I would still be eligible for all VA benefits. Last year I applied for the GI Bill that I invested $1200 into and was denied because discharge was general under honorable conditions. I had 42 months and 21 days which meets the 36 month requirement. My service in the Navy consisted of a Letter Of Commendation, elected by the Engineering Department twice to go before the board of Junior Sailor of the Year, high evaluations, and the Good Conduct Award. I took a lot of pride in everything I did in the Navy, in fact I took so much pride that I burnt myself out in the end. This is a part in my life that I would really like to correct, thank you very much for your time and attention.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copy of Eligibility for Benefits Based on Type of Discharge
Copy of Good Conduct Award dated July 26, 1998
Copy of DD Form 214
Copy of Letter of Commendation
Character reference from Senior Pastor dated March 12, 2002

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     950718 - 950726  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 950727               Date of Discharge: 990217

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 06 21
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 21                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 11                        AFQT: 56

 Highest Rate: GSM3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 4.00 (1)    Behavior: 1.00 (1)                OTA: 3. 00

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, NEA, SSDR, GCM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-142 (formerly 3630605).


 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

980810:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Drunkenness - incapacitation for performance of duties through prior wrongful indulgence in intoxicating liquor and violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence.
         Award: Restriction and extra duty for 30 days, reduction to GSMFN. Reduction suspended for 6 months. No indication of appeal in the record. [Extracted from Commanding Officer's letter dated 26 Feb 99.]
990125:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 128: Assault.
         Award: Forfeiture of $537 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 30 days, reduction to GSMFA. No indication of appeal in the record.
990204:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.
990204:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.
990226:  Commanding Officer, USS MOOSBRUGGER (DD 980) directed discharge general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense. Commanding Officer’s comments (verbatim): GSMFA (Applicant) has shown little success in adapting to the U.S. Navy and has not displayed the potential for future service, assault consummated by a battery is a serious offense causing the degradation of moral, discipline, and good order, and can not be tolerated in the United States Navy.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 990217 general (under honorable conditions) for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

The Applicant states that due to the characterization of his discharge, he is not eligible for the GI Bill. The Applicant is requesting an upgrade to the characterization of his discharge so that he can receive these benefits. The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Navy Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

The Board found the Applicant was of sound mind when he committed his misconduct, which included incapacitation for duty due to intoxication, unauthorized absence and assault. While he may feel that he had worked so hard that he "burned out", the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The record is devoid of evidence that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. The discharge and the characterization of service were appropriate. Relief on this basis is denied.

The following is provided for the benefit of the Applicant. Normally, to permit relief, the discharge or characterization of the discharge issued had to be improper or inequitable. There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Relief denied.

 The Applicant is reminded that the period of eligibility for a personal appearance hearing is 15 years from the date of discharge. The application package must be submitted to the NDRB prior to the expiration of the 15 year period. The Applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective
12 Dec 97 until 29 March 2000, Article 1910-142 [formerly 3630605]. SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT- COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE .
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00907

    Original file (ND99-00907.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910 - 142 (formerly 3630605). No indication of appeal in the record.980804: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.980804: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00710

    Original file (ND01-00710.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 011127. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant’s issue states: “My discharge was improper because I honestly am not a thief and I believe that if I was given another chance I would have better represented myself. The applicant did not provide any documentation to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00311

    Original file (ND02-00311.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Hello Members of The Board,My name is (Applicant), I want to re-enter the Navy that is the reason that I need my discharge changed. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 U. S. Navy Seabee Rates PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 991027 - 991114 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01112

    Original file (ND03-01112.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Award: Forfeiture of $690 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 15 days, reduction to CTTSA.020618: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.020618: Applicant advised of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01219

    Original file (ND99-01219.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-01219 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990920, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Eight pages from applicant's service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00461

    Original file (ND01-00461.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00461 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010227, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010907.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00347

    Original file (ND03-00347.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00347 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20021223. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Three pages from Applicant’s service record Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01466

    Original file (ND03-01466.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-01466 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030910. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. In this regard, a characterization of service of general (under honorable conditions) was warranted since your record of service constituted a departure from that expected of a Sailor in the U.S. Navy.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00412

    Original file (ND99-00412.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MMFN (applicant) has no potential for further service. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 980423 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A). Although the Board respects and appreciates the applicant’s over four years of service, the seriousness of the above offense is such that the Board found the characterization of the applicant’s discharge as Other Than Honorable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01427

    Original file (ND03-01427.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. In the absence of a discharge package, the Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B), and after a thorough review of available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and...