Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00347
Original file (ND03-00347.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-ATAR, USN
Docket No. ND03-00347

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20021223. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a personal appearance discharge review before a traveling panel closest to Detroit, MI. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel; all hearings are held in the Washington DC area. The NDRB also advised that the Board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20031205. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910 - 142 (formerly 3630605).

 .

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “My discharge was inequitable because at the time of my incodents I was dealing with bouts of Depression. I was seeking help prior to the misconduct in question. I was not aware of exactly the name of this disorder at the time.
I would not receive proper care and agknowledgement of this until I was diagnost at the VA hospital in Detroit.

Therefore I request an upgrade to Honorable Discharge and respectfully request my Reenlistment code be changed to RE-1.

My condition is manageable by medication and has aloud me to pursue a normal emotional state.

Given the opportunity, I would much like to return to Active Duty in the Navy and fill my obligations to my country.

I request a reply on this matter. ”
Applicant marked the box "I HAVE LISTED ADDITIONAL ISSUES AS AN ATTACHMENT TO THIS APPLICATION." None were found.
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Three pages from Applicant’s service record
Applicant’s DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     980720 - 990217  COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 990218               Date of Discharge: 001108

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 08 21
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 23                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 11                        AFQT: 65

 Highest Rate: ATAA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NMF*                          Behavior: NMF             OTA: NMF

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

* No Marks Found

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-142 (formerly 3630605).

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

000530:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Failure to obey a lawful regulation or instruction.
         Award: Forfeiture of $563 per month for 2 months, extra duty for 30 days, reduction to ATAR. Reduction suspended for 6 months. No indication of appeal in the record.
000814:  Vacate suspended reduction to ATAR awarded at CO’s NJP dated 000530.
000814:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Absence without leave on 000630, violation of UCMJ Article 90: Assaulting/willfully disobeying superior commissioned officer on 000630.
         Award: Correctional custody for 30 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
001018:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Fail to go to appointed place of duty on 0700, 000826, to wit: duty section muster, violation of UCMJ Article 107: False official statement.
         Award: Reprimand: Oral/writing. No indication of appeal in the record.
001018:  Retention Warning: [Extracted from Commanding Officer’s letter dated 001030 provided by the Applicant.] No further information found in service record.
         
001030:  Commanding Officer recommended a general (under honorable) discharge by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense. Commanding Officer’s comments (verbatim): [On 25 August 2000, Airman Recruit G_ (Applicant) stated to his Leading Petty Officer that he would be sick-in-quarters (SIQ) for the weekend and unable to perform duty. Airman Recruit G_ (Applicant) subsequently missed his assigned weekend duty. Later it was found that Airman Recruit G_ (Applicant) was not in fact SIQ and was not even in his room during the weekend in question. On 18 October 2000 Airman Recruit G_ (Applicant) was found guilty at Captain’s Mast of Unauthorized Absence and Making False Official Statements. During the period of time Airman Recruit G_ (Applicant) has been onboard, he has been described as a below average sailor. Airman Recruit G_’s (Applicant’s) lack on integrity in dealing with his supervisors demonstrates that he lacks the potential for continued naval service. I approve his separation and recommend that his discharge be characterized as General (Under Honorable Conditions).] [Provided by the Applicant as supporting documents.]

001108:  DD Form 214: Applicant discharged general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

 Partial discharge package missing from service record.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20001108 with a characterization of general (under honorable conditions) for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1: The Applicant contends that his problems in the Navy can be attributed to his "bouts of depression." While he may feel that his depression was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief on this basis is denied.

Concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.

 T here is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, and certification of community service and non-involvement with civil authorities are examples of verifiable proof that can be submitted.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.



Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 30, dated 7 Nov 00, effective 30 Aug 00 until 24 Jan 01, Article 1910-142 [formerly 3630605]. SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01442

    Original file (ND03-01442.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. ” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 4) (2) Nine pages from Applicant’s service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: None Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00338

    Original file (ND01-00338.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Court memorandum list 112 as one of the UCMJ Articles 980608: DD Form 124: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.Discharge package missing. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00676

    Original file (ND02-00676.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 Statement of Service dated June 21, 2001 Twenty-five pages from Applicant's civilian medical record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 000630 - 001019 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 001020 Date of Discharge: 010417 Length...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00826

    Original file (MD04-00826.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. _______________________________________________________________________ In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166 and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in supplement to this Applicant’s petition. The Applicant’s personal situation does...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00861

    Original file (ND00-00861.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00861 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000705, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Another mitigating circumstance at the time of my discharge was the indication by the legal officer involved that there would not be a material difference in perception between an honorable discharge and a general discharge under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00320

    Original file (ND02-00320.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00320 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020128, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, the applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, documentation of community service,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00735

    Original file (ND04-00735.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. There was nothing in the records, nor did the applicant provide any documentation, to indicate there existed error of fact, law, procedure, or discretion at the time of discharge. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00549

    Original file (ND03-00549.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to entry level separation or uncharacterized. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 950710: Applicant ordered to active duty.970429: Applicant missed ship’s movement. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19980430 under honorable conditions (general) for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A).

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01271

    Original file (ND03-01271.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:DD Form 149, dated February 16, 2001 Letter of Commendation for December 13-18 1996 Letter of appreciation, dated February 6, 1998 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00106

    Original file (ND03-00106.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00106 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20021024, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. [Note BUPERSINST 1900.8 list the authority as 3630600 instead of 3630605] Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :000725: Special Court Martial: Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86: Specification 1: Unauthorized absence from 000321 to 000323 (2 days). You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other...