Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00087
Original file (ND02-00087.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PRAR, USN
Docket No. ND02-00087

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 011016, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20 June 2002. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – commission of a serious offense, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

 1. SEE ATTACHED WRITTEN STATEMENT.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant's Statement (2pgs)
Copies of DD Form 214 (2)
Copy of Certificate of Promotion (Seaman)
Copy of Certificate of Completion (Aircrew Survival Equipment Course, Class A1)
Character Reference Letters (3)
Employment Reference Letters (2)
Reference Letter
Copy of Graduate Certificate from Dept of Correction Elizabethtown Training Academy
Copy of Certificate for Exceptional Performance on Duty
Copy of Certificate of Completion (Police Rifle Expert)
Copy of Certificate of Completion (Suicide Prevention)
Copy of Certificate of Completion (Expandable Baton)
Copy of Certificate of Completion (Olearesin Capsicum Aerasal)
Copy of Certificate of Completion (Nova Spirit hand held, non lethal electronic immobilization devices)
Copy of Standard First Aid and Adult CPR Cards
Letter from Applicant to Governor of South Carolina (2pgs)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USN                        None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     901121 - 910903  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 910904               Date of Discharge: 921113

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 02 10
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 39

 Highest Rate: PRAN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2.20 (2)    Behavior: 2.20 (2)                OTA : 2.20

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM

Days of Unauthorized Absence: 17

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – commission of a serious offense, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.


 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

920713:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112: Drunk on duty on or about 920701 as duty section 2 member prior to VAQ-131 0400-0800 Flight Line Watch.
         Award: Extra duty for 30 days, reduction to E-2 (suspended for 6 months). No indication of appeal in the record.

920902:  Applicant seen for psychiatric evaluation in regard to suicidal ideation and alcohol abuse. He is considered free of psychiatric disease and fit for duty.

920904:  Punishment of RIR to PRAA suspended at CO's NJP of 920713 vacated due to continued misconduct.

920921:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from on or about 0730, 920731 until on or about 1240, 920817 (17days/R), violation of UCMJ Article 87: Missed movement on 920801.
         Award: Forfeiture of 1/2 pay per month for 1 month, restriction for 30 days, reduction to E-1. No indication of appeal in the record.
920924:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.
920924:          Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
920925:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

921016:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 921113 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

 Issue from letter: The Applicant contends his military offenses can be attributed to the hardship he encountered as the result of a failing marriage. The NDRB recognizes that serving in the U.S. Navy is challenging. Our country is fortunate to have men and women willing to endure the hardships and sacrifices required in order to serve their country. It must be noted that most members of the Navy serve honorably and well and therefore earn honorable discharges. In fairness to those members of the Navy, commanders and separation authorities are tasked to ensure that undeserving Sailors receive no higher characterization than is due. While the NDRB respects the fact the Applicant tried, his service is equitably characterized as being performed under other than honorable conditions. Relief is not warranted.

The following is provided for the benefit of the applicant. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for clemency, based on post-service conduct. Based on the seriousness of the applicant’s misconduct the documents he provided were insufficient to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support his issues at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), effective 15 Aug 91 until
04 Mar 93, Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

 B. Under the Manual for Courts-Martial, a punitive discharge is authorized for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 87 (Missing Ship’s Movement), and Article 112 (Drunk on Duty), if adjudged at a Special or General Court-Martial.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls10.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE RM 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00976

    Original file (ND01-00976.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – commission of a serious offense, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 880614 - 900408 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 880608 - 880613 COG Period of Service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00387

    Original file (ND00-00387.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-EOCN, USN Docket No. ND00-00387 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000203, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Giving the Naval Personnel Board the above issues to consider, I am respectfully and hopefully requesting that my Other Than Honorable Discharge be upgraded to an Honorable Discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01023

    Original file (ND02-01023.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01023 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020711, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. No indication of appeal in the record.920710: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: UA from unit from 920526 to 920615 (20 days/S); violation of UCMJ, Article 87: Missed ship's movement on 920527. The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00022

    Original file (ND02-00022.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00022 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010924, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Issue 1 states that the discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in 41 months of service with no other adverse...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01153

    Original file (ND99-01153.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    950714: Summary Court-Martial for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Wrongfully possessing weapons on board NAS Cecil Field without proper authority, violation of UCMJ Article 92: Violate a lawful order by having a female guest in the barracks after hours, violation of UCMJ Article 109: Without proper authority, willfully damage, by writing on it, one photograph of AA M____ A____. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01151

    Original file (ND01-01151.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. (Equity Issue) This former member avers that his character of service should be upgraded because he was not charged with any military violations. 950906: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed a serious offense and civil conviction, that the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00953

    Original file (ND01-00953.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.880920: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure and misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense as evidence by your uncooperative attitude, lack of willingness and motivation to participate in alcohol rehab and CO's NJP dated 871218 for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Violate a lawful general regulation (introduction of alcohol aboard ship);...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00171

    Original file (ND03-00171.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, I can state that I was immature and had certain problems. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19901222 - 19910624 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 19910625 Date of Discharge: 19930817 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01155

    Original file (ND99-01155.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.930311: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: (2 Specifications), Unauthorized absence from appointed place of duty on 930305 and 930309, violation of UCMJ Article 134: Unlawful entry on 930215 into the restricted barracks office. 930415: BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge General under Honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the Commission of a serious offense. You may obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to: DA...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00245

    Original file (ND01-00245.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. (Equity Issue) This former member further requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of his application. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of debt collection notice Letter from applicant dated December 15,...