Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00387
Original file (ND00-00387.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-EOCN, USN
Docket No. ND00-00387

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 000203, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000831. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – commission of a serious offense, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

1. I served 9 years and 11 months in the United States Navy. I believe it was the best choice of my life. The Navy gave me a career, taught me how to be a professional and how to be a success in life. During the time of my active duty, I received numerous letters of appreciation, ribbons, medals, 2 Good Conduct Medals, Sailor of the Quarter and other recognitions and awards. I worked hard, went and served anywhere I was sent and did all that was asked and required of me.
March of 1992 I was deployed to Guam. While in Guam, my wife attempted suicide in Gulfport, MS. and was admitted to Keesler AFB Hospital. I went home on emergency leave at the request of the doctor in charge of her case. After she was discharged from the hospital, I returned to Guam to assume my duties. My wife called me on the telephone April 03, 1992, while I was still in Guam, and informed me that she wanted a divorce. I was devastated. I went to the Chaplain, company chief, company commander and then to my battalion commander requesting to return to Gulfport, MS. to attempt to save my marriage. I was denied my request. Instead of sending me back to Gulfport, I was relieved of my duties and spent the last month of my deployment in the barracks. On May 05, 1992 I returned to Gulfport, MS. at the conclusion of my deployment tour of duty with Naval Mobile Construction Battalion One. I went on 30 days leave. While on leave and in transit to my next duty station, I attempted to convince my wife not to divorce me and to reconcile our differences. She expressed that she wouldn't consider reconciliation as long as I was in the Navy. In a futile attempt to restore and repair my relationship with my wife, I allowed my judgement and good sense to become impaired. I became an Unauthorized Absentee at the end of my leave and transit time. Looking back at it now, it was the worst decision I have ever made in my life. Not only did I loose the respect of my country and family, but also of myself.
I was arrested by the Long Beach, MS. Police Department and taken into custody. I was then escorted to Groton, CT. Naval Base where I was incarcerated in the brig to await court martial. Following my court martial, I requested to be discharged from the Navy. That was the second worst mistake of my life. September 1992, I went on terminal leave. November 1992 I received my Other Than Honorable Discharge. My bad judgement cause me my Naval career and I failed to save my marriage.
Since being discharged from the Navy, I was employed by Heinz Pet Products as a forklift operator. A skill I acquired while in the Navy. After one year of employment, I was promoted to Dock Boss on the second shift. After the second year, the plant was closed and I was laid off. Currently, I work for Markham Products, Inc. I have been employed with this company for 3 years. In the first year, I was promoted to Vice-President of the company. This is the position I currently hold. I have also attended and graduated from Barber College and am now a licensed Barber in the state of Oklahoma. I am also on the Board of Directors for the Barber College from which I graduated. I haven't had so much as speeding ticket since my discharge from the Navy and have become a productive citizen of my community.
In closing, I know I made a series of grave mistakes during a very traumatic period in my life. I supported the United States Navy and proudly served my country for over 9 years. I held a very impressive service record up and until the time that I went U/A.
Giving the Naval Personnel Board the above issues to consider, I am respectfully and hopefully requesting that my Other Than Honorable Discharge be upgraded to an Honorable Discharge. Thank you for the opportunity to present this request. Sincerely,
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USN                        900316 - 920331  HON
                  USNR             840827 - 900315  HON
         Inactive: USNR            831221 - 840826  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 920401               Date of Discharge: 921125

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 07 25
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 26                          Years Contracted: 2

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 27

 Highest Rate: EO2

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.40 (2)    Behavior: 3.40 (2)                OTA : 3.40

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: ASM, AFEM, SSDR, NUC, MUC, BER, GCM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 52

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – commission of a serious offense, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

920702:  Applicant declared a deserter.

920924:  Special Court Martial
         Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86:
         Specification: Unauthorized absence from 0001, 23Jun92 to 14Aug92 (52 days).
         Findings: to Charge I and specification thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: Confinement for 45 days, forfeiture of $300 per month for 4 months, reduction to EOCN.
         CA 920924: Sentence approved and ordered executed.

920924:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.
920924:          Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
921005:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

921030:  CNP recommended to Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower and Reserve Affairs that applicant be discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

921105:  Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) approved recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

921109:  BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 921125 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

The NDRB considered the applicant’s letter including the circumstanced surrounding the discharge and the applicants post service conduct. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the re characterization of a discharge. The applicant must be aware that there is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, may be considered by the NDRB.

The applicant is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at personal appearance hearing is highly recommended.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), effective 15 Aug 91 until
04 Mar 93, Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE RM 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00716

    Original file (ND99-00716.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    TWO MONTHS HAD PAST SINCE THE DEPLOYMENT OF THE USS RUEBEN JAMES, MY WIFE AND I HAD RECEIVED OUR FIRST BORN PLUS STILL WORKING ON IMPROVING OUR MARRIAGE SINCE I WAS HOME, WHILE DURING THIS TIME SUDDENLY THE ADMIRAL FROM THE BASE (PEARL HARBOR HAWAII) HAD SENT ORDERS FOR ME TO BE SENT ON DEPLOYMENT WITH THE USS INGERSOLL ON A SIX (6) MONTH DEPLOYMENT. THE PSYCHIATRIST HAD SEEN ME TWICE AND RECOMMENED TO THE ADMIRAL OF THE BASE THAT I WAS NOT FIT FOR DEPLOYMENT SO FROM THIS RECOMMENDATION I...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01108

    Original file (ND02-01108.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-ROCA, USN Docket No. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Letter to Board for Correction of Naval Records, incorporated as Applicant's issue, undated (2 copies) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 860421 - 860903 COG Active:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00354

    Original file (ND99-00354.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered: Copy of DD Form 214. Applicant’s letter dated 981130 Copies of Applicant’s service record (previously held by the NDRB) Copy of letter and enclosure to the applicant from GEICO Insurance dated 940614 Copy of GED and associated scores PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 921125 -...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00380

    Original file (ND02-00380.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Subsequent to the application, the Civilian Counsel informed the Board that he does not represent the Applicant in regards to his Application for Review of Discharge. Patient reported having 45 days of confinement for going UA and stated he is going to be discharged. The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00601

    Original file (ND03-00601.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040128. 920211: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Wrongful use of marijuana on 920117. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00408

    Original file (ND04-00408.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. In spite of all my problems, I didn’t abuse drugs or alcohol. By this time I had been away from home for several months, away from my friends and what little family I had.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01188

    Original file (ND03-01188.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The member’s entire military record. Line 1 of MILPERSMAN 1910-138 is titled Policy and it states members may be processed based upon a series of at least three, but not more than eight, minor violations of the UCMJ provided; and there are five rules that follow. I feel that I should have never been discharged from the Navy.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00780

    Original file (ND01-00780.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – commission of a serious offense, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600. I also request that the narrative be changed from commission of a serious offense to something not so severe. Joining the military was a big change for me I had just gotten out of high school and I was only 17 yrs old when I was in boot camp.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01449

    Original file (ND03-01449.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Commission of a serious offense does not require adjudication by nonjudicial, judicial proceedings or civilian conviction; however the offense must be substantiated by a preponderance of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00387

    Original file (ND03-00387.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00387 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030107. The Applicant requests that the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions and the reason for the discharge be changed to “general under medical condition.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. My ship was in the Gulf for some time and we did many things we were instructed not to discus off the ship to any one.