Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00014
Original file (ND02-00014.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-SN, USNR
Docket No. ND02-00014

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010925, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant listed Veterans of Foreign Wars as the representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020517. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

 1. Because the applicant presents no issues on which to base an argument on his behalf. We ask that you review the case based on the evidence of record and change the discharge as appropriate.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
Copies of Employment Laboratory Reports (3)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USN                        None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 920115               Date of Discharge: 950302

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 02 15
         Inactive: 00 11 03

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 8

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 58

 Highest Rate: SN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.25 (4)    Behavior: 3.20 (4)                OTA: 3 .50

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SSDR, USCGSOSR(3), JMU, Rifle (Marksman), .45 Pistol (Marksman)

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

921218:  Ordered to active duty for 24 months under the Seaman Apprenticeship Training program.

941218:  Extended on active duty for 23 months.

950105:  NAVDRUGLAB [Norfolk, VA], reported applicant’s urine sample, received 941228, tested positive for [THC].

950112:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of a controlled substance (marijuana).
         Award: Forfeiture of $150.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 30 days. No indication of appeal in the record.

950112:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

950120:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by CO's NJP.
950120:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

950217:  BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 950302 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1. The applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. The discharge was proper and equitable. Relief denied.

The applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required. Relief denied.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9/94, effective
22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls10.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00486

    Original file (ND03-00486.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040114. Issues submitted by Applicant’s representative (Disabled American Veterans):“Dear Chairperson:After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of evidence assembled for review, we continue to note the contention of the appellant in his request for a discharge upgrade of his current Other...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00602

    Original file (ND99-00602.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 910605 - 950301 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 910425 - 910604 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 950302 Date of Discharge: 961126 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 08 25 (Does not exclude lost time) Inactive: None PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 961126 in absentia under other than...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00718

    Original file (ND00-00718.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 950302 general under honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s first issue states: My undesirable discharge was inequitable because it was based on an isolated incident...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00196

    Original file (ND03-00196.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19791031 - 19800313 COG Active: USN 19800314 - 19840311 HON USN 19840312 – 19891130 HON Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 19891201 Date of Discharge: 19950511 Length of Service (years,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00417

    Original file (ND03-00417.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20031215. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00198

    Original file (ND00-00198.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00198 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 991124, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to Honorable. No indication of appeal in the record.980706: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to Drug abuse as evidenced by your nonjudicial punishment on 29 June 1998 for the wrongful use of marijuana, in violation of Article 112a,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00169

    Original file (ND99-00169.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.951214: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by all drug incidents in your current enlistment.951219: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.951222: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00057

    Original file (ND02-00057.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    To: Navy Discharge Review Board, I am honorably requesting an upgrade in my discharge status. 950328: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and by a vote of 2 to 1, recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. Despite the applicant’s excellent performance evaluations, her drug abuse warranted processing...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00914

    Original file (ND02-00914.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's resumé PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 900330 - 900719 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 900720 Date of Discharge: 930515 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 09 26 Inactive: None ]930508: Commanding Officer recommended...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01217

    Original file (ND04-01217.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions) or to entry level separation or uncharacterized and the reason for the discharge be changed. The summary of service clearly documents that misconduct due to drug abuse was the reason the Applicant was discharged. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the...