Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01176
Original file (MD02-01176.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PFC, USMC
Docket No. MD02-01176

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020814, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a personal appearance hearing discharge review before a traveling panel closes to Harrisburg, PA or a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter to the Applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel, all hearings are held in the Washington D.C. area. The NDRB also advised that the Board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030522. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNCHARACTERIZED/ CONDITION NOT A PHYSICAL OR MENTAL DISABILITY, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6203.2.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

 Submitted by Applicant's Mother:

Dear Council,

Please consider the change of my son’s discharge. He was ousted from the Marines on a Medical Problem. P_ (Applicant) made it through Boot Camp and was attending the School of Infantry when his problem happened. P_ (Applicant) needs to return to the structure of life the Marines gave him. He wishes to return to active duty in the Tank Division.

This is a young man who wishes to fight for his country and uphold her freedom. Since being home he has encouraged once of his classmates to join. He leaves in August for Parris Island. As a parent I am hoping P_ (Applicant) will return to the Marines by the time he leaves boot camp so maybe they can maybe over the next six years see ach other and have that special band Marines have with each other.

P_ (Applicant) was really gun ho when he received his orders for the School of Infantry at Camp Geiger. He left on Aug 27, 2001 and then 6 or 7 weeks into it was in MRP till December 4, 2001. Since being home 99% of the household conversation is about the Marines. Please return this young man to the Marines we dare not watch the news because I cannot relax. If he hears anything about his beloved Marines he is off.

Growing up in my home war & fighting were kept to a minimum. Have so many of my relations in the other branches and in the wars from WWII, Korean, Vietnam, Iran, P_ (Applicant) is and always will be Our Families' first Marine. It is in blood to fight for freedom, tro protect our homelands. P_ (Applicant) has a desire and perhaps a goal in his life. He wants to make a career out of the Marines.

Even today he marches about saying those chants. P_ (Applicant) still does sit ups etc. I remember when we first met each other on parents day, I took one look in this young mans eyes and knew without spoken words I had taken Second Place in his life. P_ (Applicant) was so excited to be the First Marine. His love for the Marines dates back to forever.

Please allow him to returns to the marines (yesterday would have been nice.) (Ha Ha) If he cannot return s Ingatry because of his knew than please try to find him a place. He proved he was strong. P_ (Applicant) made it through Boot Camp and the Crucible in his 12 weeks. P_ (Applicant) was not detained in anyway. He finished on time. Why can you not find a place for him.

P_(Applicant) is willing to do whatever it takes to return to P.F.C. Marine status. Yes he was promoted right before Thanksgiving. If you are good enough to be promoted when why can he not be good enough to return. When P_ (Applicant) as very small I quietly made him a promise to always be there to back and support him. I think by now you can tell the service was not my first choice for P_ (Applicant).

P_ (Applicant) however wanted it and still desires to return so as a Mother I am doing my part. Yes Marines I love him very much. P_(Applicant) has a love for the Marines that only someone with a desire to be the best at who you are could have. He has a drive to push himself for the Marines like none I've ever seen.

As a Mother who loves her only child, I have seen this drive become almost an obsession. I feel as his mother I know where its from. You want to be somewhere or someone and you taste it. I pray to the Lord that you find it in your hearts and realize a young Marine want to return. I feel P_(Applicant) would accept whatever came his way. P_(Applicant) will give the Marines the 120% to get the job done.

Please see if you can help me. P_(Applicant) really wants Tank Division, but he wants Active Duty and wishes to return for a Career. Thank you for taking the time to read this and hopefully you will take it under careful consideration and allow him o return. I as his mother await your answer. Please let it be first among your priority.

Thanks again. Semper Fi, A Marines Mother, (Signed L_ A. B_) God Bless you all.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
2 Copies of DD Form 215
Letter from Applicant's Mother (L_ B_) undated
Copy of DD Form 214
Millennium Orthopaedic, LTD, report dated Sep 10, 2002
20 pages of Applicant's service record book/medical record

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                010312 - 010521  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 010522      Date of Discharge: 011204

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 06 13
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 57

 Highest Rank: PFC

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.1 (2)              Conduct: 4.1 (2)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Rifle Marksman Badge

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNCHARACTERIZED/ CONDITION NOT A PHYSICAL OR MENTAL DISABILITY, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6203.2.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

010913:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct [your diagnosed physical condition not a disability, Knee injury, and any resultant or aggravated condition which interfere with the effective performance of your duties]. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

011001:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with an uncharacterized service by reason of convenience of the government for a physical condition not a disability.
011001:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.

011119:  CO, NAVHOSP Camp Lejeune Separation Recommendation: Applicant's evaluation and treatment plan reviewed. Pt is a 20 year old male with a history of Right Knee Pain due to Patellofemoral Syndrome. His symptoms developed during boot camp. His condition has failed to improve despite treatment with prolonged light duty and medications. Pt refuses further treatment and evaluation. He has waived his rights to a physical evaluation board after counseling and is recommended for an administrative separation for Right Knee Pain due to Patellofemoral Syndrome.

011120:  Commanding Officer, Headquarters and Support Battalion, School of Infantry, Training Command, Camp Lejeune recommended discharge with an uncharacterized service by reason of convenience of the government for a condition not a physical or mental disability. The factual basis for this recommendation was due to PFC B_ (Applicant) possesses a medical condition (Right Knee Pain due to Patellofemoral Syndrome) which is so severe as to impair his ability to complete his required entry level training. Consequently, PFC B_ (Applicant) does not posses the physical ability to continue active service in the Marine Corps.

011130:  GCMCA [CO, School of Infantry, Camp Lejeune, NC] directed the Applicant's discharge with an uncharacterized service by reason of physical condition not a disability.

020530:  DD Form 215 issued changing the reenlistment code to RE-3P.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 011204 with an uncharacterized service by reason of convenience of the government due to condition not a physical or mental disability (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

By regulation, members administratively processed within the first 180 days of enlistment are given characterization of services as “Uncharacterized” unless there were unusual circumstances regarding performance of conduct which would merit an “honorable” characterization. The Applicant’s service record did not contain any unusual circumstances during his six months in the military to warrant a change of discharge to “honorable.” Relief denied. The Applicant should be aware that, with respect to nonservice-related administrative matters, i.e., VA benefits, civilian employment, educational pursuits, etc., an uncharacterized separation shall be considered the equivalent of an honorable or general (under honorable conditions) discharge.

 Concerning the Applicant’s reenlistment, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Marine Corps or any other branch of the Armed Forces. However, neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter.
The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E, effective 18 Aug 95), paragraph 6203, CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01094

    Original file (ND02-01094.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01094 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020801, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed. The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. My evidence of this situation is Lt. P_ of the USS Truman who went out the way to help me talk to my wife and my wife harassment...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01061

    Original file (MD99-01061.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Memorandum from Dr J_ L_ S_ M.D., Colonel, U.S. Army, Medical Corps Psychiatrist (2 copies) Letter from the Honorable Mr. P_ to Board of Correction of Naval Records dated May 12, 1999 Letter from Dr. S_ A. M_, M.D recommending overturning discharge to honorable dated October 15, 1998 USMC Medical Records (23 pages). After a thorough review...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01382

    Original file (MD03-01382.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01382 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030812. So people in society treated me so different it was hard to even go to school. 990708: Charges preferred to special court-martial for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 86: Unauthorized absence (UA) from 980317 to 990601 (441 days/A).

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600287

    Original file (MD0600287.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD06-00287 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20051129. After I returned home, I was severely depressed for several months. Commanding Officer’s comments: “After considering all the evidence, I request that this Marine be discharged from the Marine Corps.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00019

    Original file (MD03-00019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00019 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20020926 requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to Entry Level Separation or Uncharacterized. 941122: Commanding Officer recommended honorable discharge by reason of erroneous enlistment. 941218: GCMCA [CG, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune] directed the Applicant's honorable discharge by reason of erroneous entry into the U.S. Marine Corps on the basis of not meeting the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500597

    Original file (ND0500597.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Navy recruiters were made aware of this change, on aug. 3, 2000 the day that I received my paperwork from the courts, and assured me that this would be taken care of as soon as possible. And I tried to explain that this is what I have been told the whole time and everyone keeps telling me the same thing. The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the purpose of obtaining employment; this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00674

    Original file (MD99-00674.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DD214 says only "discharge". After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s issue, the Board found that the applicant believes that he should have received an Honorable discharge. The Board also found that the applicant indicated, on his enlistment physical and boot camp physical, that he did not have asthma, when in fact he did as evidence...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00836

    Original file (MD02-00836.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00836 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020522, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. He has waived his rights to a Physical Evaluation Board after counseling and is recommended for an administrative separation for Mechanical Lower Back Pain, DNEPTE.010924: Commanding Officer recommended discharge with uncharacterized service by reason of convenience of the government for a condition not a physical or...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00180

    Original file (MD03-00180.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was told that in order to have anything done about my knees, I would need to upgrade my discharge.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR (J) 000823 - 010521 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 010522 Date of Discharge: 011129 Length of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00795

    Original file (MD02-00795.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00795 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020513, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. He made go to a community college, full time so I can qualify to be come a U.S. Marine Oct 18, 1998 I got my diploma on the 19 th I left for boot camp. The day I regret walking away, from the thing that made me proud and happy.