Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01086
Original file (MD02-01086.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-LCpl, USMC
Docket No. MD02-01086

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020729, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant listed member of Congress as his representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter to the Applicant, he was informed that members of congress do not represent applicants before the Board and that written authorization must be obtained from the Congressman. Such authorization was not received; therefore case reviewed without representation.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030410. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

1. I'm trying to start my life over, by not having an honorable discharge, this tends to slow my career. I am a lot more responsible now, than I was in the Marines. I am trying to go to college, and getting my benefits for college would help. I've been trying to upgrade since I've been out of the Marines, Please consider my request.
2. I am seeking help to reinstate my discharge from the Marine Corps. "from Other than Honorable" to Honorable". I would like to take a moment of your time to tell you about my situation.
I am a 26 year old veterans of the United States Marine Corps., and currently a resident of St. Petersburg Fl. I enlisted in the Marines in 1993 on the delayed entry program. Then serves as a Marine from June 1994 to January 1998. I was released in 1998 with an " Other than Honorable" discharge, do to misconduct. From that point all the benefits I paid into and or earned were taken away.
Since my discharge in 1998, Iv'e been working dead end jobs and also trying to upgrade my discharge to honorable, to receive my G.I. bill and go to college full time.
I am working as a truck driver, which is not the career I had hoped for! I am planing to go to college, however the reinstatement of my military benefits are needed. I am interested in studying computer and physical fitness. I have great aspiration and intend to set my goals high.
I love my Country and was honored to serve. I was the best rifleman and artillery cannoned in my battalion. What I was guilty of as a Marine was, being irresponsible on the weekend. The Marine Corps. Motto was "Work hard play hard!". I'm very proud of serving my country and would do it all over if I could. I am much more responsible and mature now than I was in the Marine.
Please consider my request for an upgrade with full benefits. I would like to redirect my future in a more positive direction.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Letter from Applicant, dated May 17, 0002
Response Letter from BCNR, dated May 7, 2002
Employment Reference Letter, dated April 3, 2002
McKenzie Tank Lines, INC Position Description, dated January 29, 2001
Copies of DD Form 214 (2)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                930623 - 940620  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 940621               Date of Discharge: 980108

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 05 22
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 42

 Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.3 (9)                       Conduct: 3.8 (9)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, Meritorious Mast, SSDR, LOA, Rifle Expert (3 rd )

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 15(971014-971028)

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

930617:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.

950707:  NJP for violation of UCMJ Article 81: In that PFC L_ did at Base Exchange, Camp Foster, Okinawa, Japan, at or about 1800 on 950701, conspire with LCpl M_ to commit an offense under the UCMJ to wit: larceny and wrongful appropriation, of a value $59.00 the property of the Base Exchange and in order to effect the object of the conspiracy the said [Applicant] and LCpl M_ did wrongfully appropriate a Nintendo cartridge by switching the price to a lower price and paying for the said item at a false lower price.
 Awarded forfeiture of $427.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 45 days, reduction to E-1. Not appealed.
950611:  Applicant in the hands of foreign authorities from this date until 950621for the larceny of a privately owned vehicle belonging to a local national and damages to subject vehicle. Applicant released on 950622 without trial from the Japanese government as he will be prosecuted by U.S. Military authorities.

950710:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct (Frequent involvement in acts of theft and larceny; Applicant's lack of integrity and untrustworthy behavior is not consistent with the high standards expected of Marines and will not be tolerated). Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

950920:  Summary Court-Martial.
         Charge I : violation of the UCMJ, Article 81,
         Specification: In that [Applicant], U.S. Marine Corps, did, at Okinawa, Japan, on or about 950611, conspire with LCpl M_ C. P_, U.S. Marine Corps, and PFC O_ A. M_, U.S. Marine Corps, to commit an offense under the UCMJ, to wit: wrongful appropriation of a red, two-door hatchback Daihatsu, of a value of about $1000.00, the property of Marutaka Transportation Company, and in order to effect he object of conspiracy the said [Applicant], LCPL P_, and PFC M_, did enter the said Daihatsu, look around to observe if anyone was watching them and drive the said Daihatsu from where it was parked. Charge II : violation of the UCMJ, Article 109: In that [Applicant], U.S. Marine Corps, did, at Okinawa, Japan, on or about 950611, willfully and wrongfully damage a citizen's band (CB) radio by pulling the microphone cord off the radio and pushing the radio with full force to the floor, the amount of said damage being in the sum of some value, the property of Marutaka Transportation Company. Charge III : violation of the UCMJ, Article 121: In that [Applicant], U.S. Marine Corps, did, at Okinawa, Japan, on or about 950611 wrongfully appropriate a red, two-door hatchback Daihatsu, of a value of about $1000.00, the property of Marutaka Transportation Company.
         Finding: to Charge I and the specification thereunder, guilty. To Charge II and the specification thereunder, not guilty. To Charge III and the specification thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: Confinement for 21 days.
         CA action 951013: Sentence approved and ordered executed.

970530:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct (Using poor judgement by allowing a fellow Marine to drive a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol). Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
970912:  Statement from Sgt R_ T_ stating that Cpl E_ and Cpl F_ approached him and told him that LCpl P_, [Applicant], and LCpl D_ were using drugs.

971001:  Applicant, in written statement, affirms that he has read and understands his rights as given under the UCMJ, admits to having a drug problem, states that he voluntarily told his section SNCOIC, and requests Level III treatment.

971007:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct (Concerning Applicant's involvement of a discreditable nature with military and civilian authorities by disobeying a lawful order specifically using illicit drugs while on active duty in the United States Marine Corps). Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

971009:  Statement from Cpl J_ J. E_ acknowledging [Applicant]'s use of a controlled substance.

971009:  Statement from Cpl J_ M. F_ acknowledging [Applicant]'s use of a controlled substance.

971014:  Applicant to unauthorized absence status from 0600 this date until 1600 on 971029 (15 days/surrendered).

971016:  Substance Abuse/Chemical Dependency Evaluation indicates Applicant was diagnosed as drug dependent. In accordance with MCO P5300.12, the Applicant was ordered into Level III Treatment and was placed in a non-deployable status until completion of treatment. Applicant was recom-mended for administrative discharge after treatment. A bed space was reserved for him at the Substance Abuse Rehabilitation Department, Naval Medical Center, San Diego, CA.

971105:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct (Concerning Applicant's involvement of a discreditable nature with military or civilian authorities by failing to be at my appointed place of duty with the intent to avoid field exercises specifically, failing to report to battery formation at 0600 on 971014 located on the battalion grinder in preparation for movement in support of CAX). Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
971118:  NJP for violation of UCMJ Article 86: UA (AWOL) from 0600 on 971004 to 1600 on 971029 (15days/S); violation of UCMJ Article 112a: At MCAGCC, 29 Palms, CA at an unknown time and date, did wrongfully use a controlled substance.
 Awarded forfeiture of $575.00 pay per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duties for 45 days, reduction to E-3. Not appealed.
971205:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
971206:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27(b), elected to waive all rights.

971208:  Applicant to Naval Medical Center, San Diego, CA for a period of about 25 days in order to undergo substance abuse rehabilitation; released from treatment on 980102.

971208:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was the Applicant's confirmed use of Metham-phetamines as indicated in written statements [included as references to the notification] from the Applicant and from his fellow Marines.

971216:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

971218:  GCMCA (Commanding General, 1st Marine Division (Rein)) directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 980108 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1: The Applicant contends that his post service conduct, to include his increased maturity, his desire to continue his education (college), and his employment record, warrants consideration in the upgrade of his discharge. T here is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. The NDRB is author-ized, however, to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understand-ing of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. E vidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities, and credible evidence of a substance-free lifestyle are examples of verifiable documents that may be provided to receive consideration for relief based on post-service conduct. At this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation for the Board to consider an upgrade to his discharge. Relief on this basis is denied.

Additionally, the Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, will change the characterization of service and/or the reason for discharge if an error or inequity exists within the separation process. The Board found that no such error or inequity occurred during this process and that the Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Relief on this basis is also denied .

 The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The Applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00648

    Original file (MD00-00648.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, may be considered by the NDRB. The applicant is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00039

    Original file (MD02-00039.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00039 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010926, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful disobedience of the orders and directives which regulate good order and discipline in naval service, and falls short of that required for an honorable...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501118

    Original file (MD0501118.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD05-01118 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050621. I work two jobs. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500850

    Original file (MD0500850.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Violation of UCMJ Article 91: Specification: In that Lance Corporal M_ (Applicant) with 3rd Intelligence Battalion, III MHG, III MEF, having received a lawful order from Sergeant T_, a noncommissioned officer, to report to Sgt J_, an order which it was his duty to obey, did on board Camp Hansen, willfully disobey the same. Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 107 (2 Specs): Specification 1: In that Private D_ D. M_ (Applicant), U. S. Marine Corps, 3d Intelligence Battalion, III Marine...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01341

    Original file (MD02-01341.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    931215: Applicant informed eligible but not recommended for promotion to Cpl for the month of January 1994 due to alcohol dependency and failure of Level III alcohol rehabilitation. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19931223 under honorable conditions (general) due to alcohol rehabilitation failure (A). The Applicant is reminded that she remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00808

    Original file (MD03-00808.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION “(Equity Issue) Pursuant to 10 USC 874 (b) (UCMJ, Article 74) and in accordance with SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraphs 2.24 and 9.3, this former member requests the Board’s clemency relief with up-grade of his characterization of service on the basis of his post-service conduct.” PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501043

    Original file (MD0501043.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD05-01043 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050601. Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application and from an attached document/letter to the Board: “My request is for an honorable discharge, however if the review board doesn’t determine my appeal to warrant an honorable, I would accept a general/under honorable conditions. The first incident is an Administrative Remarks form contained in my OMPF dated 2001/07/05 stating that I...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00630

    Original file (MD04-00630.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. During that inspection LCpl B_ blew in a breathalyzer with a result of .06. The NDRB is authorized, however, to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00599

    Original file (MD03-00599.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.990708: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86:Specification: Unauthorized absence on 2359, 990629. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans’ benefits and the issue of the Applicant’s Montgomery GI Bill...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01026

    Original file (MD04-01026.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-01026 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040607. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. I was discharged December 13, 2001 from the Marine Corps with an Other Than honorable discharge.