Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00648
Original file (MD00-00648.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-LCpl, USMC
Docket No. MD00-00648

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 000424, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a personal appearance hearing discharge review before a traveling panel closest to (left blank). The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel; all hearings are held in the Washington DC area. The NDRB also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 001102. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.6.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues (verbatim)

1. My discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in 42 months of service with no other adverse action. On November 6, 1998, I received a Non-Judicial Punishment on the charge of conspiracy to solicit drugs, UCMJ Article 83. As a result of that conviction, I received a discharge of "Other Than Honorable". What I did was unbecoming of a United States Marine and for that I am truly repentant. My actions were also contrary to everything my parents had taught me, and all that I should have expected of myself. I have never sold, brought or taken illicit drugs. Be assured I will never sell, buy or take illicit drugs at any time. It was incredibly bad judgement on my part to have asked or even mentioned anything about drugs especially since I was fully aware of the Marine Corps zero tolerance policy. I would be the first to admit to an act of incredible stupidity and for that I am paying a significant price. The punishment I received from the Marin Corps, in and of itself significant, cannot begin to compare to the punishment I have inflicted upon myself for my actions. I wish I could relate the conversations I have had with myself, members of my family, my minister and others about my actions. Up to that point in my career, I had honorably served more than 3 1/2 years without receiving any kind of disciplinary action. I have received numerous commendations and had been promoted to the rank of Corporal (E-4). Since my discard, I have been rejected from positions for which I was well qualified and which would have enhance my career. In addition, I cannot afford to attend a college or a university to earn a degree without the restoration of my college benefits. That one mistake, unless my discharge is upgraded, will haunt me throughout my life. The repercussions of the mistake I made have cost me immeasurably and will continue to cost me into the future.
 I respectfully request that you reconsider my case and upgrade my discharge to "Honorable Discharge." I want the opportunity to make a contribution to society both through enhanced employment and continued education. If you should any questions or if can provide and additional information, please free to contact me (telephone number deleted) or by writing to me at (address deleted). Respectfully submitted,
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Character reference dated December 14, 1999
Character reference dated November 2, 1999
 Job/character reference dated January 19, 2000
 Job/character reference dated March 22, 2000
 Copy of annual performance appraisal dated March 22, 2000
 Copy of DD Form 214
Copy of Adult Bible Study
 Copy of the microfiche

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
          Inactive: USMCR(J)                940624 - 950611  COG
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 950612               Date of Discharge: 990426

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 03 10 15
          Inactive: None
Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4
Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 32

 Highest Rank: Cpl
Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.5 (11)             Conduct: 4.3 (11)
Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SSDR, MUA, GCM
Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.6.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

960731:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Irresponsibility in the specific case of losing ID for the third time.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

981110:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 81:
 Specification: Conspire with another for wrongful distribution of a controlled substance, to wit: marijuana on 0800, 21Oct98.
 Awarded forfeiture of $591.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 45 days, reduction to LCpl. Not appealed.
981112:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.
981112:          Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.
981117:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense. The factual basis for this recommendation was your violation of the Uniformed Code of Military Justice, specifically conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance (marijuana).

990415:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

 990416:  GCMCA [Commanding General, 2d Marine Division, II Marine Expeditionary Force] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT
REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 990426 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).
In response to the applicant’s issue, the applicant implies that a permissive doctrine exists whereby one in the military is allowed an "isolated incident". The Board believes that the applicant is confusing this with the civilian world wherein some offenses are treated with leniency because they are a first time incident on an otherwise clear record. No such leniency exists in the military. The applicant is responsible for his actions and must accept the consequences of his misdeeds. The Board will not grant relief on the basis of this issue.
The following is provided for the applicant’s edification. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge (E). The applicant must be aware that there is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, may be considered by the NDRB. The applicant is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at personal appearance hearing is highly recommended.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 until present).

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 81, conspiracy.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

 E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                   Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00181

    Original file (MD04-00181.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION (Equity Issue) On behalf of this former member, we request that the Board consider provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.1740, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this application.In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166 and SECNAVINST 5420.1740, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00131

    Original file (MD04-00131.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:Issue 1: “My discharge states that I was discharged because of a commission of a serious offense based on my arrest by civilian authorities on 910426 for criminal conspiracy. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01031

    Original file (MD04-01031.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant states, “Kinser PMO took it upon themselves to look at the video tape with no probable cause or anything.” The Board found no indication in the record that the Applicant was denied any legal rights or that his nonjudicial punishment proceedings or administrative discharge was improper or inequitable. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00573

    Original file (MD01-00573.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This was my first brush with trouble.After a review of the Fortner Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of the evidence assembled for review, we continue to note the contentions as set forth on the application by the appeallant of an upgrade of his current Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge to that of Honorable.The record reflects the FSM served in the United States Navy from...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00143

    Original file (MD00-00143.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 940929 - 950711 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 950712 Date of Discharge: 970620 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 11 09 Inactive: None After a thorough review of the records, supporting...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00123

    Original file (MD02-00123.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall change to: UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL)/ SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. The issue that I am submitting to the Discharge Review Board is that my discharge is improper. I base this on the fact that during my time in the Marine Corps, I did my duty and served with honor.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00564

    Original file (MD02-00564.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00564 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020312, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Bill for college because of the Military Discharge I received. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans’ benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00205

    Original file (ND04-00205.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00205 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031117. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01382

    Original file (MD03-01382.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01382 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030812. So people in society treated me so different it was hard to even go to school. 990708: Charges preferred to special court-martial for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 86: Unauthorized absence (UA) from 980317 to 990601 (441 days/A).

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00704

    Original file (MD02-00704.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-PVT, USMC Docket No. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Naval Council of Personnel Boards Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309 Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023