Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01034
Original file (MD02-01034.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PVT, USMC
Docket No. MD02-01034

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020715, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a personal appearance hearing discharge review before the Board in the Washington National Capital Region. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. Subsequent to the application, the Applicant obtained representation by the American Legion.

Decision

A personal appearance discharge review hearing was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030320. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service at the time of issue. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE/As a result of a court-martial (SPCM)- other, authority: MARCORSEPMAN, PAR. 1105.
A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on XXXXXX. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE/As a result of a courts-martial (SPCM) – Other, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 1105.
.





THIS BCD SHELL IS EFFECTIVE 27 JUN 89 UNTIL 31 JUN 94, ONLY.

The finding for BCD is effective 27 Jun 89 until 17 Aug 95, however, the Commandant of the Marine Corps issued an official list of the new DoD SPD codes and narrative reasons for separation on 940701.

THE CORRECT NARRATIVE REASON FOR SEPARATION FOR SPD CODE JJD2 FROM 27 JUN 89 Until 31 JUN 94 IS “As a result of a court-martial (SPCM)-Other”. (Listed on page 1-53 of MCO P1900.16D, 27 Jun 89.) THE CORRECT NARRATIVE REASON FOR SEPARATION FOR SPD CODE JJC2 FROM 27 JUN 89 Until 31 JUN 94 IS “As a result of a court-martial (SPCM)-Desertion
A general discharge is written “ UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL)” (See An under other than MCO P1900.16D, page 1-33, effective 27 Jun 89).

honorable conditions discharge is written “UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS” (See MCO P1900.16D, page 1-33, effective 27 Jun 89)

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

1.       Pursuant to 10 USC, section 874 (b), (UCMJ, Article 74) and in accordance with SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraphs 2.24 and 9.3, this former member requests the Board’s clemency relief with up-grade of his characterization of service on the basis of his post-service conduct.
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Achievement Award dated 000509
Fulton County Court Termination of Probation letter dated 000517 (2 pages)
Copy of Account Claim Letter
Copy of Appellate Leave Orders (2 pages)
Copy of Report of Return of Absentee
Copy of DD Form 214
Letter from Applicant received 030210
Letters from Applicant received 030225 (2 pages)
Applicant's Marine Corps Picture

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                870326 - 870426  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 870427               Date of Discharge: 890926

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 05 00
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 6

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 86

 Highest Rank: PFC

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.1                           Conduct: 2.1 [Extracted from SSPCMO review]


 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Rifle Marksman Badge

Days of Unauthorized Absence: 115

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE/As a result of a courts-martial (SPCM) - Other, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 1105.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

871023:  Applicant declared a deserter on 871022 having been an unauthorized absentee since 0500, 870922 from ScolsBn, MCAGCC, 29 Palms, CA.

880120:  Applicant surrendered to the USMC-RS, Toledo, OH on 880115 (1720) at ScolsBn, MCCES, MCAGCC, 29 Palms, CA. Returned to military control 880115 (1720). Retained.

880222:  Special Court-Martial.
         Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 870922 to 880115 (115 days/S).
         Findings: to Charge I and specification 1 thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: CHL for 45 days, forfeiture of $250.00 for 2 months, reduction to E-1, and a bad conduct discharge.
         CA 880425: Sentence approved and ordered executed except for the BCD.
        
880222:  To confinement, sentence of SPCM.

880330:  From confinement, to duty.

880510:  To appellate leave.

880727:  NC&PB denied clemency and restoration.

881115:  NMCCMR: Affirmed findings and sentence.

890918:  SSPCMO: Article 71c, UCMJ, having been complied with, bad conduct discharge ordered executed.
990302:  NDRB documentary record review Docket Number MD98-00762 conducted. Determination: discharge proper and equitable; relief not warranted.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 890926 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly constituted special court-martial that was determined to be legal and proper, affirmed by appellate review authority and executed (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issue 1. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency (C, Part IV). The Applicant’s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if factors in this particular case merited clemency. There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle, are examples of verifiable documentation that is normally provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The Applicant’s evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate the offense for which he was discharged. The NDRB found the Applicant’s record devoid of mitigating or extenuating factors sufficient to offset the seriousness of the offense for which the discharge was awarded. Relief denied.



Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURTS-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16D), effective 27 Jun 89 until 17 Aug 95.

 B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00825

    Original file (MD99-00825.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-00825 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990525, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of Special Court Martial action Copy of DD Form 214 Copy of Modification of Appellate Leave Orders PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component,...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00825 (5)

    Original file (MD99-00825 (5).rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-00825 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990525, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of Special Court Martial action Copy of DD Form 214 Copy of Modification of Appellate Leave Orders PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00463

    Original file (MD03-00463.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00463 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030122. The main reason I am able to accept this responsibility is strongly due to my training in the Marine Corp. Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 128: Assault Cpl F_ on 19 Aug 88.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00234

    Original file (MD02-00234.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00234 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020109, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Copy of Combat History-Expeditions-Award Record Copy of Record of Service PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01124

    Original file (MD99-01124.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-Pvt, USMC Docket No. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 900703 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly constituted special court martial that was determined to be legal and proper, affirmed in the legal chain of review and executed (A and B). The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00227

    Original file (MD01-00227.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I've served 11 years 9 months and 28 days of active service and was discharged with a Bad conduct discharge as a result of a Special Court Martial for a violation of Article 114A of the uniform code of Military Justice. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 (2 copies) Discharge Upgrading Questionnaire (10 pages) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00702

    Original file (MD02-00702.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Documentation In addition to the service record (there was no DD FORM 214), the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Certificate of Completion (Marine Rifleman Combat Skills) Commanding General’s Voluntary Leave Awaiting Appellate Review Letter dated August 4, 1992 (2 pages) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC None Inactive:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00474

    Original file (MD02-00474.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. However, the Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00552

    Original file (MD00-00552.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article [ e.g., Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days]. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00367

    Original file (MD01-00367.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 901015 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly constituted special court martial that was determined to be legal and proper, and affirmed in the legal chain of review and executed (A and B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and...