Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01124
Original file (MD99-01124.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD99-01124

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 990824, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to entry level separation or uncharacterized. The applicant requested a personal appearance hearing discharge review. The applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000424. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE/As a result of a courts-martial (SPCM) – Desertion, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 1105.


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues
1. I am asking to have my discharge upgraded in order to return to duty in the Marine Corps. I have grown and matured in the years since I was on active duty and I have recognized my mistakes as well as learned from them. I am confident that I will uphold the core valves of the U.S.M.C. and that I will serve my country and my Corps selflessly and wholeheartedly. Thank you for considering my request.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
CNPB ltr to Honorable J_ P. M_ concerning Applicant dtd Jul 21, 1999
NPRC ltr to Honorable J_ P. M_ concerning Applicant dtd Feb 4, 1999
Certificate of Military Service reflecting BCD issued on Feb 3, 1999
Copy of DD Form 214
Character Reference letter from N_ C. M_, (2 pages) dtd 18 Feb 99
Character Reference letter from J_ D. S_, (2 pages) dtd 2 Feb 99

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                871223 - 880523  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 880524               Date of Discharge: 900703

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 01 10 (Does not exclude lost time)
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12      (but didn't graduate)            AFQT: 40
                 
Highest Rank: PFC

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 2.94 (5)             Conduct: 3.28 (6)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Rifle Sharpshooter Badge

Days of Unauthorized Absence: 107 (includes confinement)

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE/As a result of a courts-martial (SPCM) - Desertion, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 1105.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

890118:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: did willfully disobey a lawful order given by Sgt O_ to keep his room clear; violation of UCMJ Article 86: failed to go at the time prescribed to Photo Sciences School, LAFB CO at 0601, 881108; violation of UCMJ Article 86: failed to go at the time prescribed to Photo Sciences School, LAFB, CO at 0601, 881129; violation of UCMJ Article 86: failed to go at the time prescribed to Photo Sciences School, LAFB, CO at 601, 881208.
         Award: Restriction for 30 days, reduction to E-1. Not appealed.
890416:  To unauthorized absence since 1800.

890510:  Surrendered to HQBN SOI SAC MCB Camp Pendleton (24 days).

 890511:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct (Article 86 - unauthorized absence). Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

890523:  To unauthorized absence since 0601.

890612:  Applicant's mother was sent a letter informing her of son's unauthorized absence.

890623:  Applicant declared a deserter on 890523 having been an unauthorized absentee since 0601,890523 from SOI, MCB, Camp Pendleton.

890627:  Surrendered at 0925 at SOI, MCB, Camp Pendleton 35 (days).

890726:  To confinement, pre-trail.

890828:  Special Court-Martial.
         Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 (3 Specifications): Unauthorized absence
         Specification 1: On 16 Apr 89, absence from org until 10 May 89
         Specification 2: on 23 May 89, absence from org until 27 Jun 89
         Specification 3: on 4 Jul 89, absence from org until 5 Jul 89
         Additional Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 (2 Specifications): Failed to go to appointed place of duty
         Specification 1: at 1220, 26 Jul 89, fail to go to appointed place of duty.
         Specification 2: at 1300, 26 Jul 89, fail to go to appointed place of duty.
         Charge II: violation of the UCMJ, Article 91.
         Specification: On 26 Jul 89, was disrespectful in language toward Cpl K.R. L_, USMC
         Findings: to Charge I and Additional Charge I and all specification thereunder, guilty. To Charge II and specification thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: Bad Conduct Discharge, confinement for 60 days and forfeiture of $450.00 pay per month for 2 months.
         CA 891109: Sentence approved and ordered executed except for the BCD.
        
890828:  To confinement, Sentence of SPCM.

891010:  From confinement, to duty.

891120:  To appellate leave.

900112:  NMCCMR: Affirmed findings and sentence.

900307:  NC&PB denied clemency and restoration.

900612:  SSPCMO: Article 71c, UCMJ, having been complied with, Bad Conduct discharge ordered executed.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 900703 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly constituted special court martial that was determined to be legal and proper, affirmed in the legal chain of review and executed (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

 The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge (D). However, there is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice is evident in the applicant’s service record.

The applicant is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing within 15 years from the date of his discharge.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURTS-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16D), effective 27 Jun 89 until 17 Aug 95.

 B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article [ e.g., Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days].
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to:
                  DA Military Review Boards Agency
                  Management Information and Support Directorate
                  Armed Forces Reading Room
                  Washington, D.C. 20310-1809

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  Washington Navy Yard
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington, D.C. 20374-5023     


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-01066

    Original file (MD00-01066.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 970805 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly constituted special court martial that was determined to be legal and proper, affirmed in the legal chain of review and executed (A and B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00227

    Original file (MD01-00227.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I've served 11 years 9 months and 28 days of active service and was discharged with a Bad conduct discharge as a result of a Special Court Martial for a violation of Article 114A of the uniform code of Military Justice. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 (2 copies) Discharge Upgrading Questionnaire (10 pages) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00023

    Original file (MD03-00023.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    920122: CORRECTIVE ADMIN ACTION: CG, 3d MARDIV directed CO, 4 PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19930420 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly constituted special court-martial that was determined to be legal and proper, affirmed by appellate review authority and executed (A and B). The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00670

    Original file (MD01-00670.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Sentence: Confinement for 60 days, Forfeiture of $639.00 pay per month for 2 months, and a bad conduct discharge. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 000823 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly constituted special court martial that was determined to be legal and proper, affirmed in the legal chain of review and executed (A and B).

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501193

    Original file (MD0501193.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The way the record reads it gives the appearance that the Non-Commissioned Officer (NCO) that brought forth the allegations and specifications may have been experiencing and personality conflict with the applicant and instead of more direct counseling to resolve the issues took another approach to bring forward any charge that could be thought of to mitigate a discharge for the applicant, thereby not having to deal with the events of the past...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00221

    Original file (MD02-00221.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214Navy & Marine Corps Appellate Leave Activity, Wash DC, ltr of 3 Oct 97 concerning applicant's punitive discharge from active dutySSPCMO #97-1656 DTD 23 Oct 97 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 950713 - 951029 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01064

    Original file (MD04-01064.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    During 5 months at the SOI, Camp Pendleton, CA, the Applicant’s service was marred by 3 nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of Articles 86 (a total of 51 days UA), 91, 92, and 113 of the UCMJ. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Marine Corps and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. ...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00902

    Original file (MD01-00902.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Character Reference ltr from former Marine, R_ D. B_, dtd June 22, 2001 Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 950918 - 951204 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 951205 Date of Discharge: 980518 Length of Service (years, months,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00099

    Original file (MD03-00099.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Equity Issue) Pursuant to 10 USC 874 (b) (UCMJ, Article 74) and in accordance with SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraphs 2.24 and 9.3, this former member requests the Board’s clemency relief with up-grade of his characterization of service on the basis of his post-service conduct. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01486

    Original file (MD03-01486.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Equity Issue: Based on our review of the evidentiary record and in accordance with 10 USC 874 (b) (UCMJ, Article 74) and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraphs 2.24 and 9.3, we request on behalf of this former member the Board’s clemency relief with up-grade of his characterization of service on the basis of his post-service conduct. ________________________________________________________________________In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166, and SECNAVINST 5420.174C,...