Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00924
Original file (MD02-00924.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD02-00924

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020611, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030116. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/INVOL DIS (BOARD WAIVED) (MISCONDUCT) SER MIL/CIV OFFENSE, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.6.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues, as submitted

1. My discharge under other than honorable conditions was a result of mental illness caused by extreme anxiety, which was brought about by my service in the Marine Corps.
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Dept of Veterans Affairs Character of Discharge Decision dated 020130
Statement of Applicant dated 020318
 Resume of Applicant (not dated)
 Associates Degree for Applicant, Salt Lake Community College dated 000818
Citigroup Pay Statement for Applicant dated 020515
 Utah Marriage License for Applicant dated 990210
 N. Kentucky University Grades Report for Applicant dated 020509
 DD Form 214 for Applicant dated 950420 with Correction (DD Form 215)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
          Inactive: USMCR(J)                921015 - 921109  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 921110               Date of Discharge: 950420

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 02 05 11 (includes 24 days confinement)
         Inactive: None
Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4
Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 73

 Highest Rank: LCpl
Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 3.7 (7)                       Conduct: 3.5 (7)
Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM 930205
Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/ INVOL DIS (BOARD WAIVED) (MISCONDUCT) SER MIL/CIV OFFENSE, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.6.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

940222:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (2 specs):
 Specification 1: Absence from appointed place of duty at 0745-0815 on 940214.
 Specification 2: Absence from appointed place of duty at 1200 on 940217
Article 92:
 Specification: Dereliction in the performance of duties on 940214.
 Awarded forfeiture of $226.00 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duties for 14 days. Forfeiture suspended for 6 months. Not appealed.
941013:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Failure to be at appointed place of duty at 0715 on 941005; poor judgment, specifically making a decision to go out of bounds on a 72-hour weekend.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
941026:  Summary Court-Martial.
          Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 134:
 Specification: Wrongfully/intentionally jumping from the USS TRIPOLI on 940629.
Finding: to Charge I and the specification thereunder, guilty.
         Awarded forfeiture of $554.80 per month for unspecified month(s), and confinement for 29 days, reduction to Pvt. No indication of appeal in the record.
 CA action 061024: Sentence approved and ordered executed.
950201:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Failure to comply with the UCMJ, willfully and intentionally jumping ship, and subsequent court martial.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
950201:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense as evidenced by the results of the Summary Court Martial of 941026.
950201:  Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to make written statements in rebuttal and to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
950202:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense. The factual basis for this recommendation was the Summary Court Martial conviction evidencing the commission of a serious offense. Commanding Officer’s comments (verbatim): "Since his arrival at this command, [Applicant] has been a marginal performer, at best. He has shown little regard for his work, his fellow Marines, and himself. His recent Summary Court Martial conviction for jumping off a ship proves to me that he has very little respect or concern for the lives of himself and others. He has unnecessarily risked the loves of those people who were required to rescue him, an action which is unacceptable and should not be tolerated. His unauthorized absence further causes me to believe that [Applicant] is completely unreliable and of no value to this command or the Marine Corps."
950330:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

 950405:  GCMCA (Commanding General, 1st Marine Division (Rein), FMF) directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 950420 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).
Issue 1. The Board does not consider the circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s stated mental condition to be of sufficient nature to warrant an upgrade to his characterization of service. Although a competent medical authority found the Applicant to be psychologically unsuitable for further service, a discharge for misconduct normally takes precedence over a discharge for medical reasons. A characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions is warranted when the member's conduct constitutes a significant departure from that expected of a Marine. The Applicant’s service was marred by award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on one occasion, a summary court-martial and adverse counseling entries on other occasions. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his disobedience of the orders and directives which regulate good order and discipline in the naval service, and falls short of that required for an honorable characterization of service. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.
The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.
The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Paragraph 6210, Misconduct The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, ( MCO P1900.16D), effective 27 Jun 89 until 17 Aug 95.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence; and Article 134, wrongful jumping from ship.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.
E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:
                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                   Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01058

    Original file (MD99-01058.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-01058 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990723, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The Board does not upgrade discharges solely to assist the applicant in getting employment.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00709

    Original file (MD03-00709.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040224. I worked on base until the Commanding Officer Major P. L. N_ discussed my place in the service with the Marine Corps in the future due to I requested an early out from the US Marine Corps.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00040

    Original file (MD02-00040.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00040 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010926, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Letter of Employment and Character Reference from C_ S_, dtd May 22, 2001 Copy of DD Form 214 14 service record pages PART II - SUMMARY OF...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500607

    Original file (MD0500607.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Certificate of Completion, Elementary Certification, dated October 19, 1998 30. Certificate of Completion, Accounting, dated September 22, 1998 39. 950505: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00063

    Original file (MD02-00063.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Applicant's BCNR application dtd 3-16-01 Copy of DD Form 214 (2 copies) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00680

    Original file (ND02-00680.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 920814 - 930706 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 930707 Date of Discharge: 950727 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 00 21 Does not exclude time lost Inactive: None ...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00425

    Original file (MD01-00425.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00425 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010220, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to General/under Honorable conditions. Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 112A: Specification: Wrongful use of marijuana, a controlled substance. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00875

    Original file (MD99-00875.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-00875 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990609, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions, that the RE code be upgraded, and the reason for the discharge be changed to convenience of the government. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00932

    Original file (MD03-00932.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. Not appealed.941006: NAVDRUGLAB San Diego, CA reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 940930, tested positive for THC.941107: Applicant notified of intended...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600347

    Original file (MD0600347.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:“Please review and consider the attached DD Form 149, formal request and supporting documentation.It is my desire to simply be recognized as a “ Honorably Discharged United States Marine”. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the...