Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00063
Original file (MD02-00063.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-LCpl, USMC
Docket No. MD02-00063

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 011004, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020529. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER CONDITIONS OTHER THAN HONORABLE/INVOL DIS (BOARD WAIVED (MISCONDUCT) AWOL, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.6.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues

 1. My discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in 28 months of service with no other adverse action.
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Applicant's BCNR application dtd 3-16-01
Copy of DD Form 214 (2 copies)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                920501 -920517   COG
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 920518               Date of Discharge: 950126

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 02 08 09 (Doesn't exclude lost time)
          Inactive: None
Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 38
Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
Proficiency: 4.6 (6)                       Conduct: 4.4 (5)

 Military Decorations: None
Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Rifle Expert Badge (2), SSDR, NDSM, MM

Days of Unauthorized Absence: 157

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER CONDITIONS OTHER THAN HONORABLE /INVOL DIS (BOARD WAIVED) (MISCONDUCT) AWOL, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.6.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

940624:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct [lack of judgement which resulted in being absent for 1 day and a half]. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

940707:  Unauthorized absence from command since 0700.

 940810:  Declared deserter this date.
940811:  Apprehended/arrested by civilian authorities in Surfside, Texas.
940821:  Charged with murder and confined to the Brazoria County Jail.

 941018:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under condition other than honorable by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense as evidenced by one violation of Article 85, UCMJ (desertion from 0700 940707) and a civilian charge for manslaughter reported on 940822.
941101:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
941122:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under condition other than honorable by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense as evidenced by his being absent without leave since 940707, declared a deserter on 940810 and not hard from again until his arrest by civilian authorities in Surfside, Texas on 940821. Commanding officer’s comments (verbatim): "Lance Corporal (Applicant) was suspected of stabbing a man to death on the beach in Surfside. According to the arresting officer whose statement is contained in enclosure (8), Lance Corporal (Applicant) had "a large amount of blood on his clothes" at the time of his arrest. He also had blood on his shoulder and chest. He was charged with murder and confined to the Brazoria County Jail on 940821.

941209:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

 941213:  GCMCA [CG, 1 ST MARDIV (REIN)] directed the applicant's discharge under conditions other than honorable by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

941220:  Transferred by Service Record to the Commanding Officer, Inspector-Instructor Staff, MCRC, Ft Point, Galveston, TX.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 950126 under conditions other than honorable for misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).
Issue 1. The Board found that the applicant’s performance prior to his desertion doesn’t mitigate his misconduct. There is no impropriety or inequity in the fact that the applicant had one instance of committing a serious offense during his 28 months on active duty and was involuntarily separated with an other than honorable discharge. The record is devoid of evidence that the applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.
The applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required. Relief denied.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, ( MCO P1900.16D), effective 890627 until 950817, Paragraph 6210, Misconduct.
B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.
E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:
                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                   Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00482

    Original file (MD01-00482.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CA 950222: Sentence is approved and ordered executed (but execution of that portion of the sentence adjudging forfeiture of $395 pay per month for 1 month is suspended for a period of 6 months, at which time unless sooner vacated, the suspended portion of the sentence will be remitted without further action).950222: To confinement.950318: Returned to full duty.950405: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01058

    Original file (MD99-01058.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-01058 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990723, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The Board does not upgrade discharges solely to assist the applicant in getting employment.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01504

    Original file (MD03-01504.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040617. Sense the Due process of law had not yet been processed and had not been either been found innocent or guilty by my peers in a court of law on the date the Unite States Marine Corps decide unjust fully Other than Honorable discharge me. (His discharge was) not Only Unjust but unconstitutional as well.” After a very careful review of the Applicant’s record, the board found nothing that would support the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01205

    Original file (MD02-01205.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-01205 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020823, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed. The Board will determine which reason for discharge should have been assigned based upon the facts and circumstances before the Board, including the service regulations governing the reasons for discharge at that time, to determine whether relief is warranted. Applicant was...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00506

    Original file (MD99-00506.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Letter from Applicant Service Related Documents (7pgs) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC None Inactive: USMCR(J) 920608 - 930125 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 930126 Date of Discharge: 960722 Length...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00573

    Original file (MD01-00573.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This was my first brush with trouble.After a review of the Fortner Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of the evidence assembled for review, we continue to note the contentions as set forth on the application by the appeallant of an upgrade of his current Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge to that of Honorable.The record reflects the FSM served in the United States Navy from...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01145

    Original file (MD03-01145.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01145 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030618. 900806: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. The Applicant’s misconduct is clearly documented.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01096

    Original file (ND02-01096.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged, in absentia, on 950221 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A). The official record notes he was charged with murder by civilian authorities, a serious offense for which a punitive discharge and a life sentence is authorized. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, documentation of community...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00425

    Original file (MD01-00425.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00425 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010220, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to General/under Honorable conditions. Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 112A: Specification: Wrongful use of marijuana, a controlled substance. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01145

    Original file (MD04-01145.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The Applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation for the Board to consider.