Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00640
Original file (MD02-00640.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-PVT, USMC
Docket No. MD02-00640

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020403, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requested a personal appearance hearing discharge review before the Board in the Washington National Capital Region. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. Subsequent to submission of the DD Form 293, the Applicant appointed the Veterans of Foreign Wars as his representative. In the acknowledgement letter to the Applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030214. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues, as submitted

Naval Discharge Review Board,
This letter is in regards to the upgrade of my Other Than Honorable discharge (more specifically to the re-enlistment code) from the Marine Corps in March of 1996.
The purpose of this action is so I can, upon obtaining my degree in Aviation Science from the Ohio State University in a few months, apply for a commissioned officer flight position in one of the U.S. armed services. The current re-enlistment code won't allow for this and I do not believe this is accurate of my character or resources I can offer.
When I was eighteen years old, I joined the Marines to better myself and firmly believe that I have achieved that goal. I have included some supporting documents to illustrate my behavior over the past 5 years. The evidence shows hard work in key positions for large corporations, continued college education and also demonstrated economic/management leadership in real estate investments.
When I was nineteen years old, on the island of Kuaii, Hawaii, my squadron was performing some training and we all took an evening off, drinking at the local pub. While there, I met some local girls my age and we went for a ride after I had been drinking heavily with my Staff Sgt. I grabbed another Marine to buddy up with and we took off in the girl's car to simply hang out. One of the girls pulled out marijuana, started smoking it and passed it to me. Without thinking and intoxicated I tried it - and suddenly the other Marine got out of the car and remained silent. After a few days of training we returned to the main base on Oahu. Immediately after unloading, I was told to report to the Commanding Officer. A few days later my urinalysis came back testing positive for marijuana and I was stripped of all pride, rank, pay, and friendship while being assigned to mopping the floor duty. This one incident is not representative of my character.
Hopefully this letter shows you how I feel about this matter and how much I would appreciate an upgraded discharge and reenlistment code so I can go on to serve this great country using my acquired flight experience in college. If you have any questions please call. Thank you.
Submitted by the VFW:

 We concur with the Applicant’s contention that his UOTH discharge be upgraded. We ask that his post service employment and his continued pursuit of academic studies be considered in your decision. We refer this case to the Board for their careful and compassionate consideration and request the applicant’s discharge be reviewed for upgrading under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to general under honorable conditions.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
Résumé
 Copy of Driver License and Social Security Card
Letters of Recommendation (2)
College Transcript (2 pages)
Sierra Academy of Aeronautics Progress Report (2 pages)
Copy of College Graduation Petition for Associates Degree
Covad Communications Employment Offer Letter
 Copy of Real Estate Transfer Disclosure Statement (2 pages)
 Copy of Residential Lease (2 pages)
Ohio State University Revised Grade Report of Autumn 2001

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              None
          Inactive: USMCR(J)                940225 - 941003  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 941004               Date of Discharge: 960327

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 01 05 24
          Inactive: None
Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 5

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 71
Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
Proficiency: 4.4 (5)                       Conduct: 4.0 (5)

 Military Decorations: None
Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Rifle Expert Badge, NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None
Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

940224:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
951222:  NAVDRUGLAB [SAN DIEGO, CA], reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 951218, tested positive for THC.
960216:  Summary Court-Martial.
          Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a;
         Specification: Did, on the island of Kauai, Hawaii, on or between 951110 and 951209, wrongfully use marijuana.
         Finding: to Charge I and the specification thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: Hard Labor for 30 days, reduced to E-1.
         CA action 960223: Sentence approved and will be executed.

 960220:  Counseled concerning illegal drug involvement; specifically the use of marijuana identified through urinalysis testing given by NAVDRUGLAB SAN DIEGO CA, LAB ACCESSION NO 521522 for THC. Disciplinary and administrative discharge warnings issued.
960226:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
960226:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
960229:  Director, Substance Abuse Counseling Center, Marine Corp Base evaluation indicates No diagnosis DSM IV:V71.09 and Drug Abuse IAW Reference (a) MCO P5300.12 and Reference (b) ALMAR 246.92.
960229:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was wrongful use of marijuana.

960306:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

 960307:  GCMCA [Commanding General, Marine Corps Base Hawaii] directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 960327 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).
Issue 1. The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Drug abuse, even on one occasion, warranted processing for separation under other than honorable conditions. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity occurred during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle, are examples of verifiable documentation that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The Applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. Relief not warranted.

Concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter. Relief is therefore denied.
The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.





Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 to 30 Jan 97.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.
D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:
                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                   Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00820

    Original file (ND04-00820.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00820 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040421. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s request for hardship discharge with cover sheet, unsigned HT2 request for hardship Applicant’s résumé PART II -...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00199

    Original file (MD03-00199.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Before the Marine Corps, I had never been in any type of trouble. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Naval Council of Personnel Boards Attn: Naval Discharge...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00814

    Original file (MD02-00814.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00814 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020515, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00969

    Original file (ND00-00969.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION 991025: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).991103: Commander, Navy Region Hawaii directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00750

    Original file (ND99-00750.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 960229 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW. You may obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to: DA Military Review Boards Agency Management Information and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00025

    Original file (ND03-00025.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I have been awarded the employee of the month for May 1998 at Club Fit, as well as my important responsibilities of opening and closing the club, as well as handling the cash registers; I have been a soccer coach for 5 years now at Croton-Harmon High School, New York. Award: Forfeiture of $154 per month for 1 month, extra duty for 30 days, reduction to SR. No indication of appeal in the record.920505: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500697

    Original file (MD0500697.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The factual basis for this recommendation was wrongful use of marijuana, as supported by summary court-martial on 990804. 000118: GCMCA, Commanding General, Marine Corps Base Hawaii, advised the Commandant of the Marine Corps (MMSB-20) that the Applicant will be discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. For the Applicant’s information, the decision to administratively separate a service member is made independently of separation proceedings...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500206

    Original file (MD0500206.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to “Medical” and “Also the RE code s/b changed.” The Applicant requested a documentary record review. The medical narrative is in error when it states that I used marijuana twice in high school. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01003

    Original file (MD02-01003.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-01003 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020708, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Issue 1. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01058

    Original file (ND01-01058.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-01058 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010807, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020307. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 970214 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A).