Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00097
Original file (MD02-00097.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD02-00097

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 011011, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a personal appearance hearing before the board in the Washington National Capital Region. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, the applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Subsequent to the application, the applicant obtained representation by the American Legion.
Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020715. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

1. I received NJP and was discharged for my actions. I believe I was punished twice for the same offence. If the board decides to upgrade my discharge I would like to serve my country honorably.
2. (Equity Issue) This former member further requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this application.

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of applicant's DD Form 214
Statement from applicant dated October 2, 2001

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
          Inactive: USMCR(J)                951204 - 961201  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 961202               Date of Discharge: 980325

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 01 03 24
          Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4
Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 48

 Highest Rank: PFC
Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.4 (4)                       Conduct: 3.6 (4)
Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Rifle Sharpshooter Badge
Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

951127:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
970702:  NAVDRUGLAB, Great Lakes, IL reported applicant’s urine sample, received 970623, tested positive for THC.
971215:  Summary Court Martial
          Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 112A:
         Specification: Wrongful use of marijuana on 18Jun97.
         Finding: to Charge I and the specification thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: Forfeiture of $600.00, restriction for 60 days, reduction to Pvt.
         CA action 971215: Sentence approved and ordered executed.
980123:  Applicant refused drug dependency evaluation.
980205:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and refusal for treatment.
980205:  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
980206:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was medical officer's evaluation dated 980120 and applicant’s documented drug use.
980317:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.
980317:  GCMCA [Commanding General, 1 st Force Service Support Group] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 980325 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).
Issue 1. The applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. The fact that the applicant received a summary court martial and was involuntarily separated for this offense was both proper and equitable. Relief denied.
The NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter. Relief is therefore denied.
Issue 2. The applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required. Relief denied.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.
D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:
                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                   Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00105

    Original file (ND04-00105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-SR, USN Docket No. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). At this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider an upgrade.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01071

    Original file (MD01-01071.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 One page from applicant's service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 980312 - 980317 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00786

    Original file (MD02-00786.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    My discharge under conditions other than honorable stems from a false positive on an urinalysis test. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 980313 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01027

    Original file (ND99-01027.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Copy of Evaluation Report and Counseling Record for 97Mar01 to 97Jun03 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 960112 - 960314 ELS USNR (DEP) 960318 - 960319 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 960320 Date of Discharge: 980515 Length of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01165

    Original file (MD01-01165.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-01165 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010905, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The NDRB also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. CA 000000: Sentence approved and ordered executed except for the BCD.990823: To confinement, Sentence of SPCM.990825: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00966

    Original file (MD01-00966.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00966 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010717, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).Issues 1 and 2.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01054

    Original file (MD02-01054.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 930616 - 940606 COG Period of...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01086

    Original file (MD99-01086.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 (2 copies) Letter from applicant's primary counselor dated April 27, 1999 Character reference dated April 17, 1999 Criminal Record Check dated August 25, 1999 Letter from Pastor, Grace Reformed Baptist Church dated August 24, 1999 Letter from a member of church staff dated August 23, 1999 Copy of applicant's resume Character reference from...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00308

    Original file (ND00-00308.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION In response to the applicant’s second issue, the applicant has provided no documentation of good character and conduct for the Board to consider a recharacterization based on his post-service conduct, therefore relief is denied. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 Dec 97 to 19 May 99, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01419

    Original file (MD03-01419.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The formal conversation that persued questioned whether I wanted to continue my military career even though the Marine Corps has a zero tolerance policy on drug use.”...