Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01173
Original file (ND01-01173.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-DCFN, USN
Docket No. ND01-01173

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010917, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020419. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

 Prior to the documentary discharge review, the applicant introduced no issues as block 8 on the DD Form 293 is blank.

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of Previous DD Form 214 (Honorable)
Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USN      R                 831017 - 860929  HON
         Inactive: USNR-R                  830721 - 831016  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 860930               Date of Discharge: 890119

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 03 20
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 21                          Years Contracted: 5

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 36

 Highest Rate: HT3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.52 (5)    Behavior: 3.44 (5)                OTA: 3.64

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: BATTLE"E", SSDR (2)

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

881214:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Used a controlled substance, to wit: cocaine on or about 881117.
Award: Forfeiture of $446.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-3. No indication of appeal in the record.
881215:  DAAR indicates applicant consented to cocaine abuse. On 881207, C.O. convened mast, but the case was held in abeyance until the results of a polygraph exam have been received. SNM was determined to be deceptive on a NIS polygraph exam. Held accountable at Art 15 Hearing. [Extracted from comments block 32]
881220:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by your illegal or wrongful use of controlled substances [Extracted from CO's message].
881220:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights [Extracted from CO's message].

881227:  Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant to be a drug abuser, not drug dependent.
881230:  DAAR indicates applicant consented to cocaine abuse, found not dependent, recommended for separation not via VA Hospital.
881230:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

890107:  CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 890119 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1. The applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. The discharge was proper and equitable. Relief denied.

The applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required. Relief denied.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), Change 6, effective 11 Jan 89 until 13 Jun 90, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls10.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00686

    Original file (ND00-00686.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00686 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000504, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 930922 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00030

    Original file (ND01-00030.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00030 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001004, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to misconduct. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant’s first issue states: “My undesirable discharge was inequitable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00910

    Original file (ND02-00910.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030311. 970929: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, recommended Applicant be separated (suspended for 12 months), and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00721

    Original file (ND02-00721.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 870127 - 870128 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 870129 Date of Discharge: 890228 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 01 00 Inactive: None ]Undated: Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00362

    Original file (ND03-00362.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The Applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00801

    Original file (ND04-00801.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENTex-AA, USN Docket No. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00564

    Original file (ND99-00564.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00564 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990316, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. 930315: Applicant informed of right to inpatient treatment and signs statement declining treatment.930330: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).930427: BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00791

    Original file (ND02-00791.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00791 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020513, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Letter of Recommendation from LCdr T_ P. S_ USN, dated 24Sept1997 Copy of Character Witness Statement from D_ D. A_ JOC (SW/AW), USNdated 1June1997 Copy of Character Witness Statement from...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00233

    Original file (ND01-00233.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time of my positive testing for cocaine, I was going through serious personal problems, my father murder the largest. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 890830, in absentia, under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00890

    Original file (ND99-00890.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 870821: Ordered to active duty for 36 months under the Active Mariner program.880513: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of cocaine. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE...