Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00242
Original file (ND01-00242.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-BUCN, USN
Docket No. ND01-00242

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 001229, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. Subsequent to the application, the applicant obtained representation by the American Legion.
Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010808. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – commission of a serious offense, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.





PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues (verbatim)

1. (Equity Issue) His violations of the UCMJ notwithstanding, this former member opines that his overall service record is sufficient to warrant release under honorable conditions.
2. (Equity Issue) This former member further requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this application.
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Applicant's statement
 Letter dated August 29, 2000
 Letter from doctor at VA dated November 14, 2000
Letter from doctor at VA medical center dated August 16, 2000
 Letter from staff psychiatrist, Santa Rosa VA Clinic dated November 6, 2000
 Statement in support of claim from applicant dated November 22, 2000
 Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
          Inactive: USNR (DEP)     871229 - 880417  COG
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 880418               Date of Discharge: 920731

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 04 03 14
          Inactive: None
Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4 (13 months extension)

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 63
Highest Rate: BU3
Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.73 (6)    Behavior: 3.60 (6)                OTA : 3.73
Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SASM, NDSM, SSDR
Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – commission of a serious offense, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

900109:  Civil Conviction: Municipal Court of Gulfport, MS for violation of driving under the influence and obstruction of traffic.
          Failed to appear and was found guilty.
 Sentence: Bond facial of $1,014.00 was applied, he did not appeal.
911030:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence.
         Award: Forfeiture of $300.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to BUCN. Reduction suspended for 6 months. No indication of appeal in the record.
911105:  Vacate suspended reduction to BUCN awarded at CO's NJP dated 31Oct901.
911216:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Failure to obey a lawful written order on 2Nov91, violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Incapacitation for performance of duties on 2Nov91.
         Award: Forfeiture of $200 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 30 days, reduction to BUCA. Forfeiture for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 20 days and reduction to BUCA suspended for 6 months. No indication of appeal in the record.
920211:  Drug and Alcohol Evaluation: Applicant found to be psychologically dependent on alcohol. Recommended for Level III inpatient treatment as soon as possible. Applicant should be medically screened to rule out physiological dependency and to confirm the CAAC evaluation.
920609:  Applicant refused Level III treatment.

 920618:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure as evidenced by your refusal to participate in Level III alcohol rehabilitation program and misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense as evidenced by your violations of UCMJ article 92 disobeying a lawful order and civil conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol.
920618:          Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation and submit statements.
920618:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure and misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense. Commanding officer’s comments (verbatim): BUCN (applicant) has declined participation in directed Level III alcohol treatment and therefore leaves me no choice but to recommend him for an admin separation. In addition, he must be dual processed as his record contains two serious offenses which dictate the characterization of separation as other than honorable.
920718:  BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT
REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 920731 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).
The applicant’s representative submitted the following as issue 1: (Equity Issue) His violations of the UCMJ notwithstanding, this former member opines that his overall service record is sufficient to warrant release under honorable conditions. The Board determined that, while the applicant’s performance evaluation averages were good, his service is accurately characterized as having been performed under other than honorable conditions. During his enlistment, the applicant received a civil conviction for driving under the influence and two NJP’s for unauthorized absence, failure to obey a lawful written order and incapacitation for performance of duties. These are serious offenses that the Board cannot overlook. Relief denied.
The applicant’s representative submitted the following as issue 2: (Equity Issue) This former member further requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C., enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of his application. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge (B, Part IV). However, there is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The applicant should have produced evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a verifiable employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using alcohol in order for consideration for clemency based on post-service conduct. At this time the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of good character and conduct. Therefore no relief will be granted. He is encouraged to continue with his pursuits and is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15 years from the date of discharge.




Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), effective 15 Aug 91 until
04 Mar 93, Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.
B. Under the Manual for Courts-Martial, a punitive discharge is authorized for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 92, for failure to obey a lawful written order, if adjudged at a Special or General Court-Martial.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.
E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls10.jag.af.mil ".

 The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE RM 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00135

    Original file (ND00-00135.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION 940707: BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 940720 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A).

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01242

    Original file (ND03-01242.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing, also advised that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel, all hearing are held in the Washington National Capital Region. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00536

    Original file (ND01-00536.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Congressman Contact Authorization Letter from Applicant (3pgs) Fax from Congressman J___ A. T____ PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00203

    Original file (ND01-00203.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Letter from Applicant stating issues dated Dec 1, 2000 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 890919 - 891015 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 891016 Date of Discharge: 920916 Length of Service (years, months, days): Active: 02 11 01 Inactive: None...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500506

    Original file (ND0500506.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Recommend immediate administrative separation with the characterization of separation as other than honorable as a result of his NJP with NMCB 133 for violation of UCMJ article 134 (2 specs) indecent exposure and communicating a threat.920820: Commanding Officer, Naval Station Mayport, recommended expeditious administrative separation. The names, and votes of the members of the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00166

    Original file (ND01-00166.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00166 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001127, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Relief is denied.The applicant’s second issue states: “The truth is I had requested 4 times with a request chit to be discharged from the service prior to my Captains Masts. My request is to have an honorable discharge, Thank you.” The Board carefully reviewed the applicant’s service record and found no impropriety or...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00365

    Original file (ND00-00365.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 870413 - 930603 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 870325 - 870412 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 930604 Date of Discharge: 980602 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 04 11 28 Inactive: None 980522: Applicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00470

    Original file (ND99-00470.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Copy of Enlisted Performance Evaluation Reports for 87Aug17 to 88Mar18, 86Jul01 to 87Jun30, 87Jul01 to 87Aug16, 88Mar18 to 89Jan26 Copy of Enlisted Performance Record Copy of statement on adverse performance evaluation dated 25 January 1989 Fifteen pages from applicant's service record Copy of special request/authorization dated 13 May...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00392

    Original file (ND00-00392.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION 880525: Applicant to unauthorized absence 0600, 25May88.880527: CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.880621: CNMPC authorized discharge of applicant without return to military control. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 880628 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00183

    Original file (ND00-00183.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Disposition: Level II (pt currently attending), AA, no antabuse, recommend no lenience if pt has any further ETOH related incidents. No indication of appeal in the record.900730: Former service member notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.900731: Former service member advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear...