Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01038
Original file (MD01-01038.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PFC, USMC
Docket No. MD01-01038

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010807, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020215. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues (verbatim)

1. When I left the Marine Corps I was told that my discharge was going to be upgraded with in six months. I still have not heard anything and it's been four years.
So far my life has been security. I served America for three in a half years, and I've worked other security jobs for the past four years. I guess you could say security is my calling. I see my life at a dead stop because I can't pursue my second goal and that's to be a U.S. Marshall. I've made my first goal come true, being a Marine. My discharge is preventing my second goal from coming true. I would love nothing more than to serve my great Nation once again. The reason I became a Marine was to serve my county and protect my people. I would lay my life down to save someone else's. All I need is a second chance to prove myself. My discharge was based on one instant in my life. It's hard to get along in this world today and with the one black mark on my record makes it harder. I need back up. When I was in Security Forces I didn't mind the long hours or the long days. I knew I was doing what I loved to do, protecting my country and the people in it. The thing I understood while I was in the military was things took teamwork. Life is based on teamwork; everyone has his or her own part to make this country run. Getting that second chance and being on the American team again would be a great honor. I want to jump my hurdle and do what life has intended for me. I'm willing to place my future in your hands, so maybe I can get the help I needed to reach my second goal in life, I want to become the protector I was born to be.
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                930805 - 940705  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 940706               Date of Discharge: 970922

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 02 17
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 38

 Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: No marks found      Conduct: No marks found

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, GCM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 43

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

930804:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
950706:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. Financial irresponsibility and mismanagement. Specifically, negligent failure to maintain payments of a motorcycle you purchased and buying a new cae while not having settled for insurance claim on the above mentioned motorcycle. Your continued neglect to pay your bills and your careless lack of initiative to seek help is simply unsatisfactory. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
970804:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86:
 Specification: Unauthorized absence from 1300, 17Jun97 to 0030, 31Jul97 (43 days).
Violation of UCMJ, Article 112A:
Specification: Admit to the use of a controlled substance while in a unauthorized absence status on 1Aug97.
Awarded forfeiture of $575.00 per month for 2 months, restriction for 60 days, reduction to PFC. Not appealed.
970804:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. Violation of Article 86 of the UCMJ in that I was UA from 970617-970730. Violation of Article 112A of the UCMJ in that I admitted to wrongful use of a controlled substance. Since returning from UA status my appearance, attitude, and conduct have been unsatisfactory. It is the opinion of my command that I am avoiding the unit's deployment to Okinawa and that my decision to desert, to use drugs, and actions since returning to the BN support this. The specifics of my actions since returning are documented in my Platoon Commanders statement of service, but its basic summary is that my inability to honor my commitment to the USMC and my efforts to evade deployment are cowardly and a disgrace to the uniform. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
970811:  Applicant refused medical officer's evaluation for drug addiction.
970808:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
970811:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

970813:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was battalion nonjudicial punishment that evidenced your illegal use of drugs.

970912:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

970916:  GCMCA, Commanding General, 1 st Marine Division (Rein), directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 970922 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1. The applicant’s asserts that he was told his discharge would be upgraded six months after discharge. This issue is without merit. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for clemency, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide any of these documents. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required. The applicant was briefed on the purpose and scope of the NDRB’s authority on 970811. Relief is not warranted

The applicant requested a change in the discharge for employment opportunities, specifically, employment as a U.S. Marshall. The NDRB will not change a discharge unless there was an impropriety or inequity in the discharge process or characterization assigned. The applicant’s limited employment opportunities due to the discharge received do not sufficiently demonstrate an impropriety or inequity. Relief is denied.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 to Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600380

    Original file (ND0600380.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I just do not feel that a person should be branded for life for a mistake made as a young adult. ]971230: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-146 (previously 3630620).Service Record did not contain the Administrative Discharge package. At this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of post service character and conduct to mitigate the misconduct that resulted in...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00807

    Original file (MD00-00807.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant requests his discharge be upgrade because of his post-service conduct. At this time the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of good character and conduct. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01247

    Original file (ND02-01247.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I even found the person I love the most in the world, my wife. At every job I've had since the Navy I've had to take drug tests. The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00336

    Original file (ND01-00336.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010710. 830729: Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (You have been identified as a drug abuser through urinalysis screening/awarded NJP under Article 15, UCMJ for a drug related offense), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning. Unfortunately the applicant had only 15 years from the date of his discharge to request...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600684

    Original file (MD0600684.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Appeal denied 950906.970725: Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (Failure to obey a lawful order when told to send his wife a child support payment on 970715. Appeal denied 970910.970929: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: UA from a BN muster at 2145, 970922.Violation of UCMJ, Article 92 (8 specifications): Failure to obey order,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00788

    Original file (MD00-00788.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION I was not afforded the opportunity to counsel before the process to serve me with Article 15 punishment in March 1985 was initiated. I've since petitioned for a copy of my records, and found that very little of the actions Captain C_ took against me are in record (in any form) and there is no evidence that he even tried to provide me with due process, counsel, or read me my rights for the March 1985 punishment.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00923

    Original file (ND03-00923.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. My desire to be successful has allowed me to see that in order to be successful in life I can’t have any setbacks such as the one that lead to my discharge.C_ W_ W_ (Applicant)” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Criminal record checks...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00172

    Original file (ND99-00172.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    My family is also going through counseling as well and it has proved to help them tremendously. I recommend that MSSN (applicant) be separated with an Other Than Honorable discharge.970922: Commander, Naval Base, Norfolk directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense. Changes in the applicant’s life since his discharge do not change the facts leading up to and the reason for his discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00969

    Original file (ND00-00969.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION 991025: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).991103: Commander, Navy Region Hawaii directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00743

    Original file (ND01-00743.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Mr. (applicant) enlisted in the United States Navy in August 1997. The Board found not evidence in the applicant’s official records nor did the applicant provide any documentation to show that his military service was outstanding at any time. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been...