Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00813
Original file (MD01-00813.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-PFC, USMC
Docket No. MD01-00813

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010529, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 011218. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues

1. I feel I was a good Marine, always a team player and excelling in my work. I made a mistake and was caught in it. A victim of a no-tolerance ruling. I would appreciated a review of service for an upgrade.
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
          Inactive: USMCR(J)                940105 - 940123  COG
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 940124               Date of Discharge: 961220

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 02 10 22
          Inactive: None
Age at Entry: 23                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 9                         AFQT: 61
Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
Proficiency: 4.5 (10)             Conduct: 4.4 (10)

 Military Decorations: None
Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, MM (2), SSDR, AFEM, JMU, MUC
Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

931228:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
940124:  Initial enlistment contract documents admission of pre-service marijuana experimentation. Enlistment waiver granted.
960830:  NAVDRUGLAB [Jacksonville, FL], reported applicant’s urine sample, received 960826, tested positive for THC.
960909:  Substance Abuse Counselor screening: Impression: drug abuse.
960913:  Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant to be a drug abuser, not drug dependent.
961007:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article112A:
 Specification: Wrongful use of a controlled substance, on 960826 did test positive for THC on a unit random urinalysis test.
 Awarded restriction for 30 days, reduction to PFC. Not appealed.
961008:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Drug-related incident, specifically, positive urinalysis on 960826]. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge processing warning issued.
961203:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
961203:  Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
961216:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was your confirmed illegal use of a drug, confirmed by the Naval Drug Lab, Jacksonville, Florida, positive urinalysis of your urine for THC.

961216:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.
961216:  GCMCA [Commanding General, 2d Marine Aircraft Wing] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

 Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 961220 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).
Issue 1. The applicant used illegal drugs. The Board agrees that the applicant had good evaluations throughout his tenure, but his performance prior to the drug abuse doesn’t mitigate his use of illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. The discharge was proper and equitable. Relief denied.
The applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required. Relief denied.



Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 to Present.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a, wrongful use of a controlled substance.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.
E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:
                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                   Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00334

    Original file (MD00-00334.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214. In determining whether a case merits a change based on post-service conduct, the NDRB considers the length of time since discharge, the applicant's record of community service, employment, conduct, educational achievements, and family relationships. At this time the applicant has not provided sufficient...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00206

    Original file (MD03-00206.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Before entering the Marine Corps I had never used any drugs, and since that time I haven’t used any drugs. I want to thank you for taking the time to review my request, and if you have any more questions, you are free to ask.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00940

    Original file (MD03-00940.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00940 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030502. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The issue I have with the discharge is that it has served as an additional punishment in my civilian life.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00742

    Original file (MD03-00742.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. All I want to be is a marine.” th Marines, S-3; violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: On or about 0716, 940725 through 1330, 940815, while in a UA/AWOL status, did wrongfully use marijuana (THC).Awarded forfeiture of $416.00 pay per month for 2 months (suspended for 6 months), restriction and extra duties for 45 days, reduction to E-1.

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01016

    Original file (MD99-01016.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    961120: Applicant advised of his rights and not having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.961125: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00856

    Original file (MD00-00856.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. 890801: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. After a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00485

    Original file (MD00-00485.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s issue 1, the NDRB determined this issue is without merit. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant's performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. At this time the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00942

    Original file (MD04-00942.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00942 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040518. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to uncharacterized. Reenlistment policy of the Marine Corps is promulgated by the Commandant, United States Marine Corps, Code MMEA, 3280 Russell Road, Quantico, VA 22134.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01333

    Original file (MD03-01333.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01333 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030805. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. 000814: Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.010123: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01331

    Original file (MD03-01331.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Letter of...