Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00150
Original file (MD03-00150.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PFC, USMC
Docket No. MD03-00150

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 20021028, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to convenience of the government. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that he was approaching the 15 year point for review by this Board and was encouraged to attend a personal appearance hearing in the Washington, D.C. area. Applicant did not respond.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20030926. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character and narrative reason of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER CONDITIONS OTHER THAN HONORABLE/Separation in lieu of trial by court-martial, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6419.

ART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


 Issues, as submitted

1. My discharge was based upon the conduct over an 8 month period, during which time I received a knee injury & became addicted to pain-killers & later other narcotics. I informally spoke with my Btn, Sgt Maj, he stated that it was my problem, & not the Marine Corps, to get fixed. I was UA on several occasions due to my drug problem. Eventually I was given the choice of discharge in lieu of court martial. I was young at the time and didn’t fully appreciate the significance such a discharge would have on my life. Upon discharge I completed 2 residential drug treatment programs, I was habitat, which is a 2 yrs. Program, the 2 nd was Salvation Army which was 6 months & aftercare. I have been clean since 1989, and I obtained 2 college certifications. One as a computer repair tech, & the 2 nd as an automotive service tech. I am finding it difficult to obtain loans or a respectable job due to the type of discharge I have. I pray that you will reconsider the type of discharge that I have, & grant me an upgrade in my discharge status.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214
Applicant’s DD Form 215

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                870310 - 870629  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 870630                        Date of Discharge: 880923

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 02 24
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 17 Parental Consent                Years Contracted: 6

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 53

 Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 2.8 (5)                       Conduct: 2.7 (5)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Not available.

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 53

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER CONDITIONS OTHER THAN HONORABLE/Separation in lieu of trial by court-martial, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6419.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

880324:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86:
 Specification: Unauthorized absence for 0730, 880226 to 2250, 880321 (24 days/surrendered).
Awarded forfeiture of $150.00 per month for 1 months, reduction to PFC. Suspended for 3 months. Not appealed.
880505:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86:
 Specification: Unauthorized absence from 0800 to 1200, 880428.
Awarded forfeiture of $100.00 per month for 1 month. Not appealed.
880523:  Applicant to unauthorized absence from 2001, 880523.

880604:  Applicant in hands of civilian authorities 2359, 880604.

 880606:  Applicant from unauthorized absence 1059, 880606 (13 days/apprehended).
880606:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Disregard of military rules, regulations, and authorities.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
880608:  Vacate forfeiture and reduction for 6 months.

880912:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (2 specs):
 Specification 1: Unauthorized absence from 0801, 880827 to 0900, 880901 (5 days/surrendered).
Specification 2: Unauthorized absence from 0801, 880902 to 0730, 880912 (11 days/surrendered).
Awarded forfeiture of $100.00 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duties for 14 days. Restriction and extra duty suspended for 6 months. Not appealed.
Discharge package missing from service record.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

 Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19880923 under conditions other than honorable in lieu of trial by court-martial (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issue 1. The Applicant’s discharge proceedings are not available for review. The Applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to refute the presumption of regularity in this case. No other narrative reason is presumed to more clearly describe the circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s processing for administrative separation. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, to enhance employment opportunities, or for good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle, are examples of verifiable documentation that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The Applicant’s evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate the offense for which he was discharged. Relief not warranted.





Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6419, SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16C), Change 2, effective 15 May 84 until 26 Jun 89.

 B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      



                 

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00305

    Original file (MD02-00305.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00305 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020117, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. We request equitable relief of the current discharge based on the good prior service of the member. 871231: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under conditions other than honorable by reason of conduct triable by courts-martial, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00086

    Original file (ND00-00086.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION It does not, however, change anything about the fact that the applicant had 4 NJPs, 2 retention warnings, was declared a deserter and was discharged from the Navy in absentia. The characterization is based on his time while in the service, which was served under other than honorable conditions.

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01121

    Original file (MD99-01121.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-01121 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990820, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. st Marine Division (Rein), FMF, Camp Pendleton ] determined that applicant had no potential for further service, that separation in lieu of trial by court-martial was in the best interest of the service, and directed discharge under conditions other than honorable by reason of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00493

    Original file (MD03-00493.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00493 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030131. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review.

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00952

    Original file (MD00-00952.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00952 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000731, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to honorable, and also reenlistment code so I can rejoin the military. (Equity Issue) As the documentary evidence of record supports, this former member opines that his post-service conduct has been sufficiently creditable to warrant the Board's clemency relief as authorized...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01203

    Original file (MD01-01203.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-01203 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010920, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 840601 - 850523 COG Period of Service Under...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00798

    Original file (MD04-00798.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant admitted guilt to the following violations of the UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 850716 to 890710 (1455 days).890823: SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.890824: Applicant from confinement.890830: GCMCA [Commanding General, 2d Marine Division, FMF, Camp Lejeune, NC] determined that Applicant had no potential for further service,...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01183

    Original file (MD99-01183.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board determined this issue is without merit. The NDRB reviews the propriety (did the Navy follow its own rules in processing the applicant for discharge) and equity (did the applicant receive a discharge characterization in keeping with Navy guidance or was the characterization...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01141

    Original file (MD01-01141.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-01141 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010828, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of psychiatric evaluation dated November 9, 1999 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00795

    Original file (MD02-00795.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00795 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020513, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. He made go to a community college, full time so I can qualify to be come a U.S. Marine Oct 18, 1998 I got my diploma on the 19 th I left for boot camp. The day I regret walking away, from the thing that made me proud and happy.