Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00156
Original file (MD01-00156.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-LCpl, USMC
Docket No. MD01-00156

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 001120, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a personal appearance hearing discharge review before a traveling panel closest to Houston, Texas. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel; all hearings are held in the Washington DC area. The NDRB also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.


Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010502. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.3.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

1. Incompetent Representation.

2. Ignorance of legal rights.

3. Violation of 6 th Amendment Rights.

4. No DNA samples taken to prove innocence.

5. No witnesses allowed to support claims.

6. My conduct and efficiency ratings/behavior and proficiency marks were mostly pretty good.

7. I received awards and decorations.

8. I received letters of commendation.

9. My record of promotions showed I was generally a good service member.

10. There were other acts of merit.

11. I was so closed to finishing my tour that it was unfair to give me a bad discharge.

12. I had a prior Honorable Discharge.

13. I have been a good citizen since discharge.

14. My record of NJP's/Article 15's indicates only isolated or minor offenses.


 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Statement from applicant
Copy of DD Form 214
Copy of certificate of appreciation dated September 11, 1992
Copy of certificate of commendation dated July 2, 1993
Copy of certificate of appreciation, undated
Copy of certificate of good conduct dated November 18, 1994
Copy of certificate in appreciation dated August 5, 2000
Eleven pages from applicant's medical record

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              911119 - 960222  HON
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                910123 - 911118  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 960223               Date of Discharge: 980924

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 07 02
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 22                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 32

 Highest Rank: Cpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: NMF                           Conduct: NMF

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, Certificate of Commendation, MM, Certificate of Appreciation, GCM, SSDR, HSM, Letter of Appreciation

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.3.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

970402:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [UA 60 minutes from appointed place of duty on 970326.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued
971028:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 91:
 Specification: Insubordination toward a SNCO, MSgt on 0950, 6Oct97.
Awarded forfeiture of $100.00 per month for 1 month, reduction to LCpl. Forfeiture and reduction suspended for 6 months. Not appealed.
980226:  Vacate suspended reduction to LCpl. Forfeiture remains suspended.

980325:  Copy of Criminal Investigation Division report found on microfiche.

980616:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 134:
 Specification: Indecent assault on 1930, 25Feb98, to wit: committed an indecent assault upon PFC a person not his wife by forcibly kissing PFC with the intent to gratify his lust.
Awarded forfeiture of $539.00 per month for 2 months, extra duties for 20 days. Forfeiture suspended for 6 months. Not appealed.
980813:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
980813:          Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

980813:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. The factual basis for this recommendation was your discreditable service as evidenced by two nonjudicial punishments and adverse counseling entry on page 11 of your service record.

980910:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

980910:  GCMCA [Commanding General, 2d Marine Aircraft Wing] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 980924 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

 The applicant’s issues 1-5 state: “Incompetent Representation. Ignorance of legal rights. Violation of 6 th Amendment Rights. No DNA samples taken to prove innocence. No witnesses allowed to support claims.” The Board found the applicant was in fact represented by qualified counsel and that the applicant accepted NJP in order to escape a trial at Special Court Martial. The Board found no violation of the applicant’s rights or any other improprieties. Relief is denied.

The applicant’s issues 6-10 state: “My conduct and efficiency ratings/behavior and proficiency marks were mostly pretty good. I received awards and decorations. I received letters of commendation. My record of promotions showed I was generally a good service member. There were other acts of merit.” The NDRB found that the positive aspects of the applicant’s service were outweighed by his documented misconduct. Relief on this basis is not warranted.

The applicant’s eleventh issue states: “I was so closed to finishing my tour that it was unfair to give me a bad discharge.” The NDRB found this issue without merit. The record clearly documents a pattern of misconduct in the applicant’s enlistment. The applicant had an obligation to abide by the UCMJ his entire enlistment. Relief is denied.

The applicant’s twelfth issue states: “I had a prior Honorable Discharge.” The NDRB found this issue non decisional. The applicant’s prior enlistment bears no relevance in the equity of the Other Than Honorable Discharge assigned after separation following his last enlistment.. Relief is denied.

The applicant’s thirteenth issue states: “I have been a good citizen since discharge.” The NDRB is authorized to consider post service conduct in the upgrade of the discharge, however the applicant failed to provide creditable documentation to support this issue. Relief is not warranted.

The applicant’s fourteenth issue states: “My record of NJP's/Article 15's indicates only isolated or minor offenses.” The record shows that the applicant’s misconduct included two NJP’s, Insubordination and Indecent Assault, both of which are considered serious military offenses. Relief on this issue is not warranted.

 The applicant is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at personal appearance hearing is highly recommended.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 until Present.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 91 (Insubordination) and Article 134 (Indecent Assault).
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00281

    Original file (ND00-00281.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :980910: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 0700, 27Aug98 to 1230, 5Sep98 (9 days). The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Naval Council of Personnel Boards Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309 Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00065

    Original file (MD04-00065.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 970820: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86:Specification: Absent from PT formation on 0530-0545, 970805.Awarded forfeiture of $300.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 30 days, reduction to PFC. ...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00705

    Original file (MD03-00705.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00705 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030313. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The factual basis for this recommendation was your counseling for a pattern of misconduct, your non-judicial punishments for UCMJ Articles, 86, 128, and 134 and your summary court martial for Articles 80, 81, 107, 115, and 134.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00198

    Original file (MD04-00198.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00198 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031117. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Violation of UCMJ, Article 92: did disobey a lawful order from 1stSgt T_.Awd red to E-1 and 45 days restriction and extra duties.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01129

    Original file (ND99-01129.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    980924: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by violation of UCMJ Article 86 (Unauthorized Absence) on 2 April 1998, Article 86 (Unauthorized absence) and Article 87 (Missing Movement) on 18 June 1998, and Article 86 (Unauthorized absence) on 19 September 1998.980924: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00735

    Original file (MD02-00735.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00735 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020425, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Board recommended a discharge under honorable conditions (general).920827: Commanding officer concurred with findings of Administrative Discharge Board and recommended a discharge under honorable conditions (general); no reason for discharge was specified to the GCMCA.920915: SJA review determined the case...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00250

    Original file (MD00-00250.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.980120: Applicant informed eligible but not recommended for promotion to Cpl for the promotion period Jan/Feb/Mar 98 because of assigned to weight control program.980123: Vacate suspended forfeiture of $205.00 for 2 months and restriction and extra duty for 30 days awarded at CO's NJP dated 21Aug97. After a thorough review of the...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00951

    Original file (MD99-00951.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :960207: Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct, specifically violation of Article 89 UCMJ, disrespect Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.960209: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 128: On or about 0615, 9 Feb 96 assaulted LCPL C_ by striking him with a closed fist. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01208

    Original file (MD01-01208.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Character Reference Letters (3) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC None Inactive: USMCR(J) 960109 - 960309 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 960310 Date of Discharge: 990225 Length of Service (years, months, days): Active: 02 11 23 Inactive: None Age at Entry: 18 Years...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00995

    Original file (MD01-00995.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214Copy of DD Form 215 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 861208 - 871004 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 871005 Date of Discharge: 930915 Length of Service (years, months, days): Active: 05 11 11 Inactive: None Age at Entry: 19 Years...